Submitted by 640-721 exam (not verified) on Sat, 09/19/2009 - 4:30am.
the trouble with plain “good” or “wholesome” is they are a bit nebulous in definition; it’s not always easy to be sure what is good. when i walk into a store or a market and am overwhelmed by how to make the “right” choices, they are not necessarily terms to navigate the products, especially given various and sundry labeling 640-801 exam.
i agree it’s important to not equate local/organic/etc. with “good,” as there are complexes of factors in determining the goodness of food for ourselves and for our ecosystem. a single criterion cannot encompass all that is good 642-145 exam.
but it’s also important as a consumer to not give away a label just because it’s been co-opted. when i’m looking at a myriad of products, the only way i can tell if something is good is by asking myself 642-356 exam: is this ripe/tasty/fresh? is this organic–pesticides/hormones/genetically modified? is this local–where is it from? is it made with fair labor? and try to meet as many of these concerns as possible and to be aware when i haven’t.
delicious
digg
i agree it’s important to not equate local/organic/etc. with “good,” as there are complexes of factors in determining the goodness of food for ourselves and for our ecosystem. a single criterion cannot encompass all that is good 642-145 exam.
but it’s also important as a consumer to not give away a label just because it’s been co-opted. when i’m looking at a myriad of products, the only way i can tell if something is good is by asking myself 642-356 exam: is this ripe/tasty/fresh? is this organic–pesticides/hormones/genetically modified? is this local–where is it from? is it made with fair labor? and try to meet as many of these concerns as possible and to be aware when i haven’t.