Spitzer, Madman

There's a fair amount of concern in Democratic circles that Eliot Spitzer has simply set expectations too high.

He'll be vulnerable, in four years, to critics who point to the things that haven't changed, and note that "everything" was supposed to change. And on Day One! (Dan Janison was first out of the gate on this one.) He'll compromise with the legislature on this or that, and be hit for compromising. In GOP attack-ad fantasy land, the economy will turn down and he'll have to break his No New Taxes pledge (which really didn't make much sense, unless he knows more about the future of the stock market than anyone else).

Basically, Spitzer seems to have broken the rule about not overpromising. And in a blowout year, he had no political reason to do so.

But there was a non-electoral reason to overpromise. It made a lot of legislators think that he was, basically, insane. He's publicly committed him to things that legislators might otherwise have tried, and succeeded, to talk him out of. With Joe Bruno weaker than ever and Shelly Silver playing nice, Spitzer's hand was already strong. The fact that he heads into negotiations with the legislators -- both rank and file and leadership -- convinced that he's a little nuts, a little irrational, and committed to more than he can possibly do strengthens his hand further.

The risk, in a way, was that in a good budget year, negotiations would be too easy. Spitzer has found a way to keep them hard.

Spitzer learned from his Wall Street cases that his willingness to cross the line -- as with his tacit threat to indict, and probably ruin, a major insurer -- was a wonderful negotiating tactic. In fact, the kind of politics he's most experienced at isn't electoral politics, it's negotiations over the boardroom table.

So his early promises may be bad electoral politics, but smart Albany hardball. And if he gets what he wants, that'll be good politics.



Submitted by jaygolub on Mon, 01/08/2007 - 3:29pm.

along with over-promising, his overall tone misses the point of his electoral victory.

NYer's didn't vote for him to create bi-partisanship or an atmosphere in albany where everyone is working together to "fix" NY.  they voted for HIM to fix NY single-handedly.  He is the reformer, supposedly, with a vision to make NY a better place to live and work.

Voters have no faith in thier leaders in Albany and with good reason.

He is in a position of strength and needs to exercise that strength by dictating to them reforms and policies to make NY better.


Submitted by ROCK (not verified) on Mon, 01/08/2007 - 3:35pm.
where have you been ben smith? lol
 
 

Submitted by Tom (not verified) on Mon, 01/08/2007 - 4:33pm.

Rudy didn't reform anything and he's running for president on a pretty shabby record.

Bloomberg promised to reform the Bd. of Ed. and the place is in worse shape than it's ever been in and he won re-election against non candidate Ferrer and is now spending money so people will refer to him as a presidential candidate. Meanwhile there are more homeless on the street than ever before and he's paid for polls to say that people like him.

Not sure how the public thinks based on the records of the above, so let's give the Gov. a chance to screw up before we call an end to a governorship that has barely started.

I will admit if Bruno isn't run out of the senate, it isn't a good sign of things to come.

 


Submitted by Larry Littlefield on Mon, 01/08/2007 - 4:58pm.
He should Suozzi the legislature in 2008. Simply put. Everyone will be turning out that year. And probably in a bad year. Did he want the office for his own personal ambition, or to make a difference? If the latter, he did right by pulling a pin on a grenade and threatening to let go. I'm not sure it will work. But I am sure nothing else will.
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 01/08/2007 - 5:29pm.
Spitzer was voted in to change things, not to promise to change things, which many felt meant more than just one of the three men in the room. Bruno is already on his way out, which leaves the Assembly Speaker. The cynic in me says it a game: say really tough stuff, but call everyone who may be insulted beforehand and tell em it's the other guy your talking about. Spitzer never looked at Albany corruption before as AG, which is why I would have preferred to see Suozzi. He knew the way to get through these people was with a bulldozer, not a peace pipe.
Submitted by Larry Littlefield on Mon, 01/08/2007 - 7:26pm.
You hope Spitzer will change the fiscal priorities, and lose on procedural issues. You fear that Spitzer will be given some symbolic procedural victories, the fiscal priorities will remain unchanged, and the winners will keep grabbing more and more and deferring the cost to a diminished future. Good thing the budget comes first.
Submitted by jaygolub on Mon, 01/08/2007 - 7:34pm.
fiscal issues cannot be changed without procedural progress.  three men in a room is no way to run a state and certainly no way to put together an appropriate budget.
Submitted by The Yankee (not verified) on Mon, 01/08/2007 - 7:58pm.
Spitzer should still have a fair amount of political capital (and fundraisers) to be able to, as Larry puts it, "Suozzi the Legislature." But if Spitzer does falter, he might not be able to do it if he's looking ahead to a steeper hill to climb in 2010.
Submitted by Curmudgeony (not verified) on Tue, 01/09/2007 - 10:01am.
Keep the hat. It works. As for the new gov, his tactics may not be all that exotic after all. The wind is at Spitzer's back. He bares his teeth first and compromises later when he has to. Prosecutors and cops do this. They hype the top count figuring they can fall back on the lesser counts when the deal is cut or the case goes to a jury. Ask for the moon, get what you can. He'll never have this kind of capital again.
Submitted by zss2011 on Wed, 09/21/2011 - 10:56pm.

Perfect wedding dress

All brides really wants to look good in her big day, although not all brides are able to afford a designer wedding dress. You will find lots of cheap wedding dresses available, the issue is finding one which does not look cheap. It's certainly difficult to request Cheap Simple Wedding Dresses that also looks great. If you're a bride who has limited funds and should not manage to spend much dollars on the wedding dresses, you're not alone.

If you consider your budget,but at the same time,you prefer to purchase many styles of your weddng dress, do not worry,its available.As for me, Cheap Quinceanera Dresses and Cheap Little Black Dresses are my love,as they can flatter my body type perfectly.In other cases,Cheap Couture Wedding Dresses can give you the accurate size according to your requirements,Cheap Beach Wedding Dresses are ready for your beach wedding,also,if you have some special occasions,the Cheap Special Occasion Dresses are availble,other occasions like wedding,evening,prom party,and the Cheap Wedding Party Dresses,Cheap Evening Dresses,Cheap Prom Dresses are suitable for you,of course,some brides may prefer her wedding to be casual,then the Cheap Casual Wedding Dresses
are very casual for you.Above all, they all just for your special occasions.In other hand,not only cheap enough,but also very beautiful for you.

However,every one has unique taste,which means other brides intested in some much more special dresses,such as A-Line Wedding Dresses,Cheap Modest Wedding Dressesand Cheap Homecoming Dresses.Occasionaly,some brides have pregnant before wedding,they prefer the Cheap Maternity Wedding Dresses for their big day,there are also some brides worry about her body size,I can tell you it needn't,the Cheap Plus Size Wedding Dresses are available.Some brides may be married for second time,they will choose the Pink Wedding Dresses.

Before you decide to set to search for cheap wedding gowns, visit a handful of fixtures to choose a method that appears great for you type. After you have advisable of the items the ideal dress should really seem like, you are able to go available and check for that less expensive alternative,you can take the Discount wedding dresses and Wholesale wedding dress into consideration,these two method are useful for you.

Do not forget your bridesmaid who are so important for your wedding,if she is young,then the Junior Bridesmaid Dresses are best choice,when you purchaing their dresses,you can choose theInexpensive bridesmaid dresses and Cheap Bridesmaid Dresses in order to save your money for your budget.At the same time, the flower girl and mother of bride are also the member of your wedding,then the Cheap Flower Girl Dresses and Cheap Mother of the Bride Dresses are for them,they are so beautiful and inexpensive,wish them all will love.

Perfect wedding gowns will give you the perfect wedding,so,I suggest you that take the wedding gowns into serious consideration,purchaing your dreaming wedding for your unique wedding,best wishes for you,good luck,beautiful lives.


Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.