Gatemouth: Still Vito's Useful Idiot (A Parody?)

 A few months ago I wrote a piece lamenting the mini-cult which has developed lionizing the blogger who calls himself Gatemouth.

The only thing more annoying than Gatemouth’s smug and relentless self-promotion are the seemingly endless chorus line of left wing gay bloggers (EnWhySea Wonk, Solomon Grundy, Antid Oto) queueing up to be his butt boy.  Only Michael Bouldin seems to know better, and even he was outspoken in wishing that Gatemouth come back during his recent hiatus. Hopefully, Michael has learned to be careful what he wishes for. 

And, it’s not just a gay thing.

Gatemouth is clearly the favorite bastard son of such otherwise reputable bloggers as Ben Smith, Azi Paybarah and Gur Tsabar. He even attracts regular kudos from Rock Hackshaw and Maurice Gumbs. Hackshaw and Gumbs mix this praise with criticism, but such criticism is merely “tough love”.

But the proper treatment for a disease like Gatemouth’s Syndrome is not intervention, it’s a quarantine.  As I’ve noted before, Gatemouth is Brooklyn Democratic Leader Vito Lopez’s “useful idiot”. He hides this behind a veneer of sarcasm, a waterfall of useless facts, and the occasional feigned slap, but, when push comes to shove, Gatemouth is always with Vito any time it matters, and those times when he’s not with Vito are those times when it doesn’t matter.

Most recently, Gatemouth published a four-part “Voter’s Guide”, which might as well have been printed by County, as it was essentially, and shamelessly, Vito’s palm card. 

As usual, this was disguised by meaningless gestures like a half-hearted endorsement of Tom Suozzi. Who fucking cares?

The other gesture designed to camouflage the true intent was a lukewarm and halfhearted endorsement of Mark Green buried so deep inside a three part series that by the time anyone got within a mile of it they were already fast asleep. 

Several things about the series were telling. As a peace offering, it contained an extensive (and graphic) apologia for the “Cuomo Not the Homo” scandal; and while it complained about heavy handed tactics used by Cuomo’s forces at the State Convention, it never mentioned whose heavy hands robbed Green of his 25%; any guesses who Gatemouth went in the tank for?

Anyway, Green was the choice of the Catcher-Fidler faction of regulars, so it’s not like this was in any way a true gesture of rebellion.

But, while Vito Lopez takes an interest in statewide races, it is local races where his bread is buttered and his beak is wet. And, in local races, with explainable exceptions, Gatemouth went done the line for his leader.

In the words of Al Smith, let’s look at the record:

CONGRESS:

10th CD: Vito halfheartedly supported Ed Towns (going so far to warn him about pulling out troops from a key poll site if, as expected, Towns reneged on his promises concerning judges). Gatemouth halfheartedly supported Ed Towns.

11th CD: During the course of the race, it became apparent that Vito preferred David Yassky, so he could run his aide, Alison Hirsch, for the vacancy created on the City Council. Gatemouth supported Yassky. It was also clear that Vito’s last choice was genuine reformer Chris Owens, who became a Gatemouth obsession, to the extent that, after initially feigning that Owens was his second choice, Gatey eventually proclaimed that both Carl Andrews and Yvette Clarke were to be preferred to Owens. It was also clear that Carl Andrews was Vito’s second choice. Initially, Gatemouth leveled some half-hearted criticism at Andrews, knowing that his whiter than white blog wouldn’t influence any potential Andrews voters, but, at crunch time, negative mentions of Carl virtually disappeared. Contrast this to Yvette Clarke’s treatment. Vito felt Clarke was too close to arch-enemy Bill DeBlasio. Gatemouth regularly dropped cute little jokes on Politicker and Daily Politics in which he amplified on the “Yvette is an empty suit” libel, at one point comparing her unfavorably with a bagel.

STATE SENATE:

18th SD: Vito gave a pro forma endorsement to Velmanette Montgomery. Gatemouth followed suit.

20th SD: Following the withdrawal of regular District Leader Musa Moore, Vito, smelling a victory for Eric Adams, jumped in front of the parade to appear to be leading it. Following Moore’s withdrawal, Gatemouth, who’d been critical of Adams, shrugged his shoulders and sighed.

21st SD: A county leader concerned about electeds with unsavory public images making his party look bad, and about dealing with folks whose words he can trust, Vito concluded that, on both these factors, Kevin Parker was somewhat preferable to Noach Dear. Gatemouth agreed with a similar lack of enthusiasm.  

25th SD: Marty Connor is a royal stone in Vito’s shoe, but Ken Diamondstone would be a malignant tumor requiring amputation. Vito bets on Connor; Gatemouth throws his chip into the same pot.

ASSEMBLY:

40th AD: Vito is apparently obsessed with cleaning up the party’s image, if not its operations. Word is Vito wishes Diane Gordon would go away. He may get his wish. But he would like to choose her successor, which necessitated that she receive party support. No reputable blogger could follow the same path, so Gatemouth took a dive, coming up with half mumbled excuses not even he believed.

43rd AD: The old Clarence Norman crowd is an annoyance to Vito, so he gave incumbent Karin Camara pro forma support. Gatemouth shrugged his shoulders.

46th AD: Vito put his finger in the wind and concluded Aleck Brook-Krasny was a sure winner and supported him, probably saving his campaign. Gatemouth halfheartedly jumped on the bandwagon.

56th AD: Vito’s considerable lack of enthusiasm for Annette Robinson, her co-leader Al Vann, and her son Tahaka, is balanced by an acute understanding that their lease on this property runs for lives in being plus twenty-one years; he gave Robinson pro forma support. Gatemouth dismissed her challenger as a joke (which, for a change, was actually the truth).

57th AD:  Early on, when ignorant regulars might have assumed that County would back regular district leader Freddie Hamilton, ignorant regular Gatemouth wrote a piece savaging Hakeem Jeffries.  The piece was notable mostly as a disguised defense of Andrew Cuomo in the “Cuomo Not the Homo” imbroglio (Gatemouth later wrote an undisguised defense). Later, with Vito clearly behind Jeffries, and Hamilton a sure loser, Gatemouth went out of his way to savage noble reformer Bill Batson on the thinnest of pretexts. 

59th AD: Vito loves the pernicious Jefferson Club. Gatemouth sends it a Valentine’s card. Yes, there are a few sarcastic remarks; the kind the Chairman of the Board used to make about Dino when the Rat Pack performed at the Sands.     

JUDGES:  Here’s where the deal is really sealed. Gatemouth opened with a savaging of judicial reform disguised as a plea for the same. Then the endorsements followed. At Vito’s behest, Lew Fidler concocted a palm card selling the County organization’s judicial slate, including the daughter of Diane Gordon’s co-leader, as the blue-ribbon candidates. Gatemouth magically transformed Fidler’s palm card into a thoughtful, well argued and thoroughly repugnant piece of pimp-work disguised as an essay. Plus, he took a few gratuitous slaps at Phil Smallman and John Serpico, the only real independents in the race; a thoroughly disgusting exhibition in kissing the ring of power.

A few more notes.

In virtually every out–of-Brooklyn race that was a real contest, Gatemouth either implicitly or explicitly went with the candidate backed by the bosses. The one exception being Ada Smith; no surprise there, The Flushing Tribune, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Queens organization, did exactly the same.

What's that you say? Gatemouth did a whole monologue casting doubt on Jose Rivera’s daughter? Yeah, as if she was gonna lose; and, he didn’t say not to vote for her.

And, you say Gatemouth can’t be all bad, he hates Ravi Batra. So what? That puts him in the same category with sleazy organization stalwarts like Arnie Ludwig and Doug Rosenberg. Holding someone’s coat in an internal feud within the Soprano family is not necessarily emblematic of being a reformer.

You say Gatemouth regularly makes fun of Marty Markowitz? Is there a Brooklyn regular who doesn’t do the same after a couple of drinks? Does anyone seriously believe Vito will back Markowitz for mayor? If they do, do they believe Eliot Spitzer will appoint Tom Suozzi to fill Hillary’s vacancy in the US Senate? And, anyway, Gatemouth is on the record saying Markowitz would make a good Public Advocate; doubtless, Markowitz is Vito’s choice as well.

Gatemouth, LLC, a subsidiary of the Brooklyn Organization since 2005. For more information, contact Jeff Feldman at 718-875-5870.



Submitted by EnWhySeaWonk on Sun, 09/17/2006 - 11:23pm.
I have no idea how I got dragged into this.

Submitted by Antid Oto (not verified) on Mon, 09/18/2006 - 1:12am.
I'm not even gay, actually.  Though it is kind of fun to get a place in the chorus line.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 09/18/2006 - 3:47am.

From: Maurice Gumbs.  I respect and acknowledge any intelligent person who has interesting information to present, and does not engage in vulgar, ad-hominem attacks on others. I also respect those who concede, even grudgingly, when they are confronted with facts that dismiss their allegations. It is fair to say that with respect to issues I have raised,  the current Gate-Mouth generally fits that model. And if that is a definition of "tough-love" I seal it with a kiss.

 I suspect, in fact, I am posititve,  that I come from a place much farther removed from Vito and County politics than you have ever been or ever will be. Your knowledge of the belly of the beast suggests a past intimacy on your part. And that's not a problem.

What really surprised me is that you have waited until the Primary is over to provide this enormous wealth of what appears to be credible information.  I am at a loss to understand why you declined to give us all these facts that would have helped to inform the decisions and statements we have made.  Is there an explanation you would care to share?


Submitted by dorothy siegel (not verified) on Mon, 09/18/2006 - 9:00am.

Zap. Zap. Zap. And we don't allow the circuitous outing of bloggers either. Thanks.


Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 09/18/2006 - 10:01am.
Didn't Marty Connor support Joan of Arc, I mean Margarita Lopez Torres?

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 09/18/2006 - 10:55am.

Zap.


Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 09/18/2006 - 11:24am.

The entire article is an outing?


Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 09/18/2006 - 12:11pm.
Solomon Grundy is gay?  This blog, while interesting, makes little sense.  If Hirsh lives in Manhattan, how is she going to run for City Council in Brooklyn?  Wouldn't she have little support in the community?
Submitted by Dirk (not verified) on Mon, 09/18/2006 - 1:12pm.
You lost complete credibility when you suggested Ben Smith was reputable.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 09/18/2006 - 1:33pm.
So Room Eight is really Room Gate, and Big Fats didn't find a single blogger in the Room who has integrity or who isn't kissing up to Gate-Mouth and following his lead.
Submitted by ROCK (not verified) on Mon, 09/18/2006 - 1:44pm.

Do you guys really think that all the resident bloggers on Room 8 just acquiesce to Gatemouth? Pleaseeeee. Stop the crap.

 As much as Gatemouth is a valued member of our community here, he is his own man. If he fucks up, believe me he will be pounded and hounded. If you dispute this then you haven't been paying attention to the blogs over the past two years. I have disagreed with him many times over the past two years; here and on other sites. He is still entitled to his affiliations isn't he? Isn't that freedom of choice? I don't see anyone here kissing up to Gatemouth. If he is correct on an issue then some may concur, but when he isn't I think he is taken to task. Isn't that the case ?


Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 09/18/2006 - 2:17pm.
On a day when the daily news did an editorial attacking Vito for choosing his girlfriend bother as a Supreme Court in the last unconstitutional convention ever to be held.  And why is not the fact that Vito's daughter reported in the NY Post that she is going to be picked as a Court of Claims Judge by the Republican Governor.

 

It seems the blogers on this sight are so caught up with each other and positioning themselves for taking credit that they miss the major issues and stories.

 


Submitted by Peter Lawford (not verified) on Mon, 09/18/2006 - 3:03pm.

"59th AD: Vito loves the pernicious Jefferson Club. Gatemouth sents it a Valentine’s card. Yes, there are a few sarcastic remarks; the kind the Chairman of the Board used to make about Dino when the Rat Pack performed at the Sands."

Gatey the Chairman? Surely you jest. Gatey thinks he's Sammy Davis; he's actually Joey Bishop.    


Submitted by Antid Oto (not verified) on Mon, 09/18/2006 - 3:17pm.

Solomon Grundy is gay?

He prefers androphilic.


Submitted by Bouldin (not verified) on Mon, 09/18/2006 - 3:51pm.

Just for the record, my disagreements with Gatemouth stem from our differing perspectives on Chris Owens, while what I said back when he was being hounded out of the blogosphere was a simple courtesy anyone being threatened for their opinions should expect from anyone else as a matter of course.

Interesting take on things, however.


Submitted by Bozo Redux (not verified) on Mon, 09/18/2006 - 3:53pm.

This sounds like Tilzer only ghost written by someone who speaks our dialect.

 

Two points, Catcher and the TJ Club voted for Cuomo at the Brooklyn endorsement and the State convention, carried him on their palm cards on Primary day. You are correct that Fiddler did the opposite for Mark Green all the way.

 

Second, blog world takes itself FAR too seriously. Are you seriously blogging on thequestion of whether a blogger is a spokesperson for a political faction. Aren't you ALL?

 

cmon. Get a grip.


Submitted by EnWhySeaWonk on Mon, 09/18/2006 - 5:49pm.

I only know of one Dirk in New York politics and he most certainly did not write the above comment about Ben.


Submitted by Manhattan Reader (not verified) on Mon, 09/18/2006 - 5:53pm.

    As a generally neutral observer of the Brooklyn political scene, it is refreshing to see that Brooklyn Fats voices my observation on this self-important character: "The only thing more annoying than Gatemouth’s smug and relentless self-promotion are the seemingly endless chorus line of left wing gay bloggers (EnWhySea Wonk, Solomon Grundy, Antid Oto) queueing up to be his butt boy."

Nice to know that one is not alone.

Since Gatemouth moved over to Room 8, Ben Smith's blog has been so much more enjoyable without having to wade through Gatemouth's opinionated, lenghty and continuous opining. 

 

Thanks, Fats. 


Submitted by From Central Brooklyn (not verified) on Mon, 09/18/2006 - 9:14pm.
Whatever anybody says here, whoever Gatemouth is, let me say this: Vito Lopez will have more to say on the next State Senate leader than anyone else (except for the candidate him/herself)

Submitted by SolomonGrundy (not verified) on Mon, 09/18/2006 - 9:15pm.

We meet every Tuesday night at Woof! for hot bear-on-cub sessions. I don't like 'em good-looking or clever, so sometimes we invite Manhattan Reader (not verified) to watch.

I thought the community should finally know.

Oh and btw, on the occasions that I link to GM I criticize his Clintonian politics. I just think he's usually a better writer than, say, Brooklyn Fats. But like I said, I like 'em big and stupid.


Submitted by Gate (not verified) on Mon, 09/18/2006 - 10:05pm.
Actually, I think Brooklyn Fats does me better than anyone, even Bozo. He makes his case so well I'm actually starting to believe it myself. If imitation is the sincerest form of flattery, than Brooklyn Fats can step to the front of the chorus line in front of Benjamin Dover.
Submitted by Manhattan Reader (not verified) on Mon, 09/18/2006 - 11:49pm.

    Now, now, Mary, I mean Sol, be nice.

 

 


Submitted by Mary (not verified) on Tue, 09/19/2006 - 6:52am.
What we have here on Room 8 at this defining moment seems to be a gaggle of giggling, gossiping gays. Today even Rock Hackshaw, a heretofore unabashed macho heterosexual seeks admission by bashing Andrew Cuomo. And who gets outed next? The big boy? Gosh!! Enough already, girls. Stop it!! Quit the name-dropping, face-scratching, and outing. I know your having fun. Butt this is not our thing. We're rooning our reputation and Room 8.
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 09/19/2006 - 8:58am.

The answer is Zap Zap Zap.

Room Eight will zap any and all comments that attempt to out ANY of our pseudonymous bloggers - period.


Submitted by SolomonGrundy (not verified) on Tue, 09/19/2006 - 2:24pm.

I thought it was sort of funny being called someone's buttboy (an absurdist, homophobia-laden first for me). I wanted to respond in kind.

But yeah, let's direct our bitchiness I mean Wildean wit at elected officials, not fellow bloggers.

Of course, I would take the high road, since I'm a top. Brooklyn Fats' top, specifically.


Submitted by Manhattan Reader (not verified) on Tue, 09/19/2006 - 3:10pm.

Now I know why I don't visit this blog much. Currently, it's like Jack Bailey hosting Queen For a Day.

How a piece on a Brooklyn blogger turns into an outlet for some character's sexual preference is confounding.

Let's clean it up, gentlemen.

 

 

 


 


Submitted by SolomonGrundy (not verified) on Tue, 09/19/2006 - 3:16pm.

it was the casual inclusion of a homophobic ad hominem in the original post?

Just a guess.


Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 09/19/2006 - 5:12pm.
What is homophobic about 'butt-boy'? Why is it any less offensive than 'top' which you feel free to bandy about? Or'bottom'? Or Buttman? Or, c**k su***er, for that matter? Calling people names like 'homophobic" is childish, it stifles thought and further discussion, does not add to the dialogue, frankly, trivializes a real problem, and anaesthesizes people to the problem when it actually occurs. Lighten up. At least, 'butt-boy' is more alliterative and humorous than 'bottom'.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.