My Opposition to Kindergarten – Second Grade 2 Standardized Testing by NYC Department of Education (DOE)

Statement to District 27 Community Education Council (CEC)


My Opposition to Kindergarten – Second Grade 2 Standardized Testing by NYC Department of Education (DOE)


Good evening, District 27 CEC board members and Superintendent Lloyd-Bey. Many of you know me, but for the record my name is David M. Quintana - I am the former District 27 representative to the Chancellors Parent's Advisory Council and former Co-President of the Parent's Association of MS 210.


I am also a former student and graduate of District 27 having attended PS 97, PS 60, MS 210 and John Adams High School many, many years ago.


It has recently come to my attention that the DOE (Tweed Administration) is planning to begin subjecting students in grades kindergarten - 2 to standardized testing. I am vehemently opposed to this testing and will outline the reasons for my opposition, as follows.


  • 1. School needs to be fun, exciting, and motivating for young children. Children need to read books they enjoy, discover how to solve math problems, learn to communicate and work with their peers, engage in science, civics, social studies, music and art, take field trips, and develop a capacity to imagine and think deeply. This does not happen within a testing environment.


  • 2. Testing takes precious time away from teaching and learning. Also, teaching and curriculum change with this kind of testing because teachers and schools feel pressure to prepare their students for the test. Test prep becomes the curriculum.


  • 3. The DOE bosses (Mayor Bloomberg and Chancellor Klein), if allowed to go forward with this, will store the test score data in their $80 million ARIS computer system and use it to rate teachers and schools, negatively affecting the quality of instruction being given to 5, 6 and 7 year olds.


  • 4. I ask, what evidence do we have that all the test prep (that has been forced on children in grades 3 – 8) has done anything to improve their learning? The NYC and NYS National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP – a national test – frequently referred to as the “gold” standard of testing) results in 2007 in ELA and Math - and in 2009 in the Math NAEP - show no statistical improvement - NONE. (The 2009 ELA NAEP results are due in a few weeks - which I predict will also remain flat.)


  • 5. Testing young children is highly unreliable due to the varying timetable of the academic/cognitive development in early childhood. It is unfair and potentially harmful to judge a child on testing tasks for which she/he is not developmentally ready.


  • 6. Young children may not be able to meet the demands of a standardized test for a myriad of reasons: hunger, boredom, fatigue, illness, anxiety or simply the developmental inability to sit still for protracted stretches of time. And, as any experienced educator or knowledgeable parent knows - any child can simply have a bad day. Yet, if a child receives a low score, it may set up expectations for parents and teachers that this child is, and always will be, a poor learner. Such expectations can negatively affect their future learning experience.


  • 7. Standardized tests have a long and notorious history of misrepresenting the intellectual capabilities of young children based on race, class and immigrant status.


  • 8. Test scores are not perfect measures, therefore no single test should ever be used alone to make a critical judgment about a child. Yet, the DOE, has a long history of using single test scores to judge our children and schools, a policy that I fear will be perpetuated with kindergarten through second grade testing.


  • 9. During this period of financial crisis, it would be an utter waste of money to spend millions of dollars on a testing policy that the research and education communities nearly unanimously decry as unreliable and potentially harmful to children. This is not the time to be taking money out of the classrooms to enrich large corporate testing companies.


I am urging CEC27 to thoroughly review this matter (further statistical information can be found at timeoutfromtesting.org) and issue a resolution condemning this practice in OUR NYC Public School system.


Thank you.


David M. Quintana

http://davidmquintana.blogspot.com

quintana.david@gmail.com



Meeting Date: Monday, November 16 @ 7:30 PM

Meeting Place: PS 124 129-15 150 Avenue, South Ozone Park, NY 11420



Submitted by Larry Littlefield on Thu, 11/19/2009 - 3:37pm.
Teachers do just one-half to two-thirds the business of teaching, with parents doing the rest -- parents with differing levels of motivation and ability.

As a result, children enter school with vastly different backgrounds, irrespective of whatever innate abilities they have.

With no attempt to measure this in a systematically comparable way, there is no way to allocate extra resources to those who might need it, and no way to property evaluate the efforts of teachers compared with their students.

If standarized tests aren't good enough, then it is worth investing to improve the tests. And as far as I can tell, the tests have improved from the strictly mulitple choice tests of the past.

If comparable measurements aren't going to be available, we might as well just have each teacher sign a statement at the end of the year that they did at least as good a job as the non-infiuential people deserve, reinstate fiscal (not social promotion), and stop worrying about educaction. In fact, once the cost of 25/55 starts actually being paid for, we might end up doing just that.

Submitted by Teach Children about money (not verified) on Thu, 11/19/2009 - 7:00pm.
I agree with this actually... but parents really do need to teach children about money, and financial matters.  As a single parent that was *less* than good with money throughout my youth, teaching children about money is CRUCIAL, in my mind. I’m not going to blame parents, schools, etc, but quite simply, I clearly “didn’t get it”, and I am still paying for those mistakes a decade later!

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.