Gatemouth's blogUpChuck
GATEMOUTH (1/27/10): The proof of the intellectual bankruptcy of Wall Street is their inability to learn. Rescued in the thirties from the depths of their own self-created degradation, they spent the next decade cursing the President who’d rescued them, and possibly capitalism itself, as “that man in the White House.”
What Wall Street cursed FDR for was his temerity in insisting upon setting up some rules to ensure that Wall Street’s man-made disaster would never occur again, and that the third-party victims of their depravity were allowed the basic sustenance necessary for survival. The rules Wall Street so objected to save them from disaster for more than a half century, until they were rendered obsolete by new technology and more advanced and clever forms of self-destructive avarice…
A Simple Twisted Cross of Fate
As I noted last fall while sifting through the vat of offal known as the Comptroller’s race, Councilman (as he was then) David Weprin, never bunched my panties. He reminded me of Rupert Pupkin in “The King of Comedy;” and came off as a parochial outer-borough pol, utterly lacking in vision, who appeared poised to restore the model of Abe Beame. It was one thing to hear him in front of a southern Brooklyn political club complaining about the possibity of congestion pricing--quite another to hear him whining about the potential inconveniences which might be caused by “The Bigger Better Bottle Bill.”
Her name was McGill, she called herself Lil, but everyone knew her as Nancy.
PAUL MCCARTNEY: …Too Many Reaching For A Piece Of Cake Edward G. Maloney
RESHMA SAUJANI: This is a new decade and we need a new direction…We need to put aside the policies of the past and start building the future because we are the future. That's going to take new ideas, new leadership and new bridges. Translation of message to Carolyn Maloney: MARLENE DIETRICH (in Orson Welles’ “Touch of Evil”): …Your future is all used up. Why don’t you go home? or maybe ROGER DALTREY: Why dontcha all f-f-f-fade away...talkin bout my g-g-generation
Gristly Adams (revised, with quibbles added)
As I’ve documented at various times, this is a problem which has been present from the case’s inception and persisted throughout on all sides and even among those who’ve taken no side.
Since the sole reason for the existence of this Department is to make sport of such people, I am happy to report that the problem continues unabated. The So-Called "Centrist" Democrats (and the Real Ones)
It is perhaps emblematic of the depths of despair currently implicating those of us to the left of center that not only have our factions begun firing upon each other, but among themselves. A dedicated fan (except when I am writing about matters affecting Carroll Gardens) writes: SHAMES: I think it is generally good to remind the "progressives" that progress is taken in successive steps and that incrementalism is a related concept of increase and no more a dirty word than progress. They don't seem to understand that they share their country with a lot of people who don't agree with them on everything and who also believe that they are right. East Side Sorry
BERNSTEIN: Thatcher! That man was the biggest darn fool I ever met. THOMPSON: He made an awful lot of money. BERNSTEIN: It's no trick to make an awful lot of money if all you want is to make a lot of money. ---From CITIZEN KANE The proof of the intellectual bankruptcy of Wall Street is their inability to learn. Rescued in the thirties from the depths of their own self-created degradation, they spent the next decade cursing the President who’d rescued them, and possibly capitalism itself, as “that man in the White House.”
What a Difference Three Days Makes
It is quite clear that the New York Post’s Charles Hurt thinks his readers are stupid. Certainly, he has good reason to believe this--after all, they do read the New York Post. On Sunday Morning he published the following: “Call it smear by association. It appears to be -- literally -- the only hope Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley has to pull off a slender victory here, in one of the most Democratic states in the country, for a seat so long owned by one of the most beloved liberal lions America has ever known. Grand Delusions
1) THE DEMOCRATS MUST NOW PASS A HEALTH CARE BILL WITH A ROBUST PUBLIC OPTION USING RECONCILIATION (or some other left variation on that theme). Yes, people really are still saying stuff like that. The nonsense about reconciliation proceeds from a total misunderstanding of the Senate rules. Reconciliation can only be used for budgetary adjustments in existing programs, not to create new ones. While reconciliation does create some opportunity for bootstrapping, using reconciliation still only makes sense if one is advocating passage of the Senate bill as is, and then fixing it through this process. But since Reconciliation cannot be used to create new programs, I'm not even sure that using it to add a public option to the Senate bill would be permissible after it passes.If it passes.
Physician Heal Thyself!
The sad effort of the Democratic Party establishment to lay the blame for tonight’s devastating defeat, reflected in the efforts of bloggers including myself, to lay the blame for the disaster on Martha Coakley is aided and abetted by the fact that she was her campaign proceeded without an effort or a clue. How did this woman ever win a statewide election? Feeling Hurt
CHARLES HURT (in, [where else?] the NEW YORK POST): Call it smear by association. It appears to be -- literally -- the only hope Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley has to pull off a slender victory here, in one of the most Democratic states in the country, for a seat so long owned by one of the most beloved liberal lions America has ever known. Yet this is what it's come to: Don't vote for Scott Brown because look at all the yucky people in his party.
Snorting Coakley: The Rise of Progressive Nihilism
In a brilliant New Republic article, The Rise of Republican Nihilism, Jonathan Chair skewers the intellectual bankruptcy of the contemporary Republican Party.
Because Chait’s primary focus is domestic policy, he leaves out some of my favorite examples. For instance, late last year, the self proclaimed “Party of National Security” announced its willingness to block the Defense Spending Bill, which contained the funding for continuing the two wars that Party had dragged us into without an exit strategy (and, in the case of Iraq, without any good reason). J. Scum Spermond
“There’s a big double standard here…What’s interesting here, is when Democrats get caught saying racist things, an apology is enough. If that had been Mitch McConnell saying that about an African-American candidate for president of the president of the United States, trust me, this chairman and the [Democratic National Committee] would be screaming for his head, very much as they were with Trent Lott.” --RNC Chair Michael Steele, calling for Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid’s resignation (incidentally, Steele thought that, for Lott, an apology would have been sufficient).
Hypocritical, Intellectually Dishonest, Right Wing Whore Award Winner (Trophy Retired)
TODAY’S QUESTION: Is skillful political horse-trading the mark of a hero or a villian? POINT (IT IS HEROIC): “The word "courtly" was created to describe Bruno's polite and generous manner. His image as a tough-guy boxer was accurate only until it suggested he was combative by nature. Then it couldn't have been more wrong.He was in truth a compromiser by instinct. His negotiations weren't aimed at winning as much as creating a win-win situation. He wanted his share, and was happy to give you yours..”--Michael Goodwin in the New York Daily News (6/24/08) commenting on former NYS Senate Majority Leader Joe Bruno (a convicted felon)
Los Gusanos
Yes, yes, it is important to elect some new State Senators who favor the right of same sex couples to get married. I’ve written several columns explaining why. As I’ve also explained, the way to pass same sex marriage is to pick up eight more votes in the State Senate. For perfectly understandable reasons though, LGBT political activists seem more focused upon extracting vengeance upon erstwhile allies who screwed them than they are on targeting the races that would get the job done.
|