Did Charles Barron Win the Black Vote (Who Can Tell?)?: Another Statistical Exercise

This is the third part of my trawl through the Primary results just posted on the NYC Board of Elections website. I finished this piece before I learned of John Mollenkopf’s more detailed Election District by Election District (ED) analysis of some of the same races, which puts mine to shame. However, I think the points I raise are still worthy of discussion, so I’m posting this rather than trashing it.

The object of this series is to examine shibboleths concerning the results which have arisen since the September 12th primary. For example, it has been reported, in the Brooklyn Paper, and in several blogs, that in the 25th Senate District challenger Ken Diamondstone beat incumbent Martin Connor in the district’s Brooklyn portion, and, in fact it’s been reported that Diamondstone has publicly taunted Connor over this (I’m sure Connor’s crying all the way to Albany). It’s a great story. But it’s not true. In actuality, Connor carried Brooklyn 3864 to 3,806, with two write-in votes going to Tracy Boyland.


Another statement much bandied about is that Charles Barron carried the black vote in his race for Congress in the 10th CD. This statement has been made by both blogger Rock Hackshaw and the Proud Panther himself, and has acquired the status of conventional wisdom. There is almost an unspoken subtext here that if the illegitimate votes cast by Whites, Latinos and Asians were subtracted from the total vote, then the rightful victor could be allowed to assume his seat and Congress and bestride Washington like the colossus that he so surely is. But, even discarding the racialist subtext into the dustbin of bigotry, the question remains: is the assertion that Barron won the black vote accurate?
 
Ideally, one would want to analyze this ED by ED, and then compare it with the census figures for the overlapping areas. I hope Mollenkopf does this, but until he does, you can all chew on this and savor the flavor. As I’ve stated in a previous column, there are two reasons I’ve not done the  ED by ED. First, those results cannot be pulled from the web. The second is that, even provided with the results, the time it would take to do this would be tremendous (although I will once again remind readers that anyone willing to pay me to undertake the project is free to contact me at Gatemouthnyc@hotmail.com, although you’d probably be better off calling Mr. Mollenkopf). Instead, I’ve done the analysis Assembly District by Assembly District (AD).  

The actual results of the primary were Ed Towns 19,469 (47%), Barron 15,345 (37%) and Roger Green 6237 (16%). However, if we only count the votes in the ADs (40, 41, 43, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58 and 59) where black voters accounted for the majority of the votes cast, the vote would be Towns 15,015, and Barron 13,728. Some of those expert in such things may notice that I’ve listed two ADs (41 and 59) as black majority which in actuality have a white plurality. This is because, within the borders of the 10th CD, the majority of votes cast in those ADs come from black voters. This is also true of the Latino majority 54th AD (but not the Latino majority 53rd). On the other hand, the 42nd AD, which is overwhelmingly black, is counted as white majority for these purposes, as almost all of its votes in the 10th come from an overwhelmingly Orthodox Jewish area of Midwood.   

Towns’ victory in these ADs does not end the argument. Of these ADs, Towns carried three by large margins (41, 54 and 59), and three (55, 56, 58) by small margins. Barron carried three of these ADs (40, 43, 57). There were only 73 votes cast in the 43rd, which Barron won by five votes. On the other hand Barron rampaged in his home base of the 40th, which largely tracks his Council District. It is quite clear that without Barron’s strength in his home base, this matter would not even be up for discussion.


So why does this require further discussion at all? Well, because many of the black majority ADs are far from being all black. The 40th includes a number of Russian voters in Starrett City, who were probably not inclined to support Barron; thus his margin there among blacks is probably somewhat understated. Although most of the heavily white areas of the 59th (Gerritsen Beach, Bergen Beach, Mill Island, Marine Park, Plumb Beach) are not in the 10th CD, it does include Georgetown, as well as some areas where whites are a still significant minority. The 41st portion of the 11th is black majority, but also includes an Orthodox area very much like the one in the 42nd (where Towns took 84% to Barron’s 9%). While this area is smaller than the one in the 42nd, one would expect Towns to have taken a similar margin in those EDs. Thus, when adjusted for the likely white votes, Towns' margins among blacks in the 41st and 59th are probably somewhat better than those in the 55th and 56th, but not as big as they initially appeared to be. It is also likely that Towns' margin in the 54th was somewhat inflated by votes from the significant Latino minority.

But, not all the adjustments would be made in Barron’s favor. In the white majority 50th AD, Towns won by over 1,600 votes, largely on the strength of support from Hasidic Williamsburg. But the 10th’s portion of the 50th also includes black strongholds like the Ingersoll and Whitman NYCHA projects. In Marty Connor’s race, which included the Hasidic turf, but not the black areas, he carried the 50th by over 1,400 votes, largely, but not entirely, owing to Hasidim (much of the remainder of Connor’s vote was from Latino resident’s of Williamsburg’s NYCHA projects; the very type of voter who accounted for Connor’s big victory in Manhattan). Nonetheless, even using the 1,400 figure as a benchmark, and subtracting it from Towns’ margin in the area, it is quite likely that Towns outdid Barron in the 50th’s Black areas by at least 200 votes.

And then there is the 57th.


One of the surprises of this race was Barron’s strength among white voters in the Brownstone areas. In the 52nd, Barron held Towns to a near dead heat (Towns 583, Barron 516) among a nearly all white constituency. But, reports are that the closer one got to Atlantic Yards, the better Barron ran. By contrast, in the Concord Village development located far from the yards, and largely composed of retired Jewish school teachers and struggling young families pretending to be Yuppies, Barron was beaten soundly. However, in funky Boerum Hill, Barron did quite well, especially as one got closer to Flatbush Avenue.


So, in the 57th, the site of Atlantic Yards, where Barron beat Towns by over 300 votes, it is quite conceivable that Barron’s margin (and perhaps more than that) owes itself largely to the votes of white people. And, it is quite conceivable that it was Ed Towns who won that AD’s black vote.    

All told, I think it is possible Barron edged out Town’s among black voters by a slight plurality, based entirely on his overwhelming victory on his home turf. However, it is unclear that this could be proven conclusively, even by a more detailed examination of the data. Moreover, given Green’s total vote, far higher than anyone anticipated, it is clear that Barron did not come close to getting a majority of the black vote, and he may actually been edged out by Towns. Obviously, this is a matter demanding further study by those who actually care.  My email is listed above and my rates are reasonable, but there are probably better experts already performing this autopsy.      

 

For further discussion of some of the topics within please see:
 http://www.r8ny.com/blog/jerry_skurnik/an_analysis_of_nyc_primary_results.html#comment-61713

 

 



Submitted by ROCK (not verified) on Tue, 10/10/2006 - 8:17pm.
Let's say for the sake of ending this( since you are somewhat inconclusive), that Barron edged out Towns in the black vote ( and I really feel strongly that he did); the point is though, that nobody believed me when I called it.  Look up some of my grapevine pre-race analysis.
 

Submitted by Blog for Everything (not verified) on Tue, 04/05/2011 - 8:09am.
I found it is an helpful and helpful publish so i think so it's very beneficial and knowledgeable. I'd prefer to thank you for the efforts you will have manufactured in creating this article
Submitted by hchh on Fri, 09/16/2011 - 3:10am.
Louis Vuitton Outlet has assisted many willing and potential customers to be able to  meet their needs of having nice products. The customers have been in a position  to obtain quality products and meet their goals and dreams due to the classic  products available in the Louis vuitton outlet. This outlet encourages the customers  to buy or do their shopping through online since they are in a position to  access quality and guaranteed products. Also shopping through online enables  the buyer to have an access to variety of many products which they compare and  one make a suitable choice. 
 Louis Vuitton Handbags deals with different brands of  products. These brands include handbags sunglasses belts and also clothing  among many other products. These products are warranted and this is an added  advantage to many customers since they are rest assured of security of their  money. In case of any damage before the expiry date of the warranty given there  is compensation. If the customer is not satisfied with the product there a room  for him or her to return the product and get another one which satisfies her or  his desire. 
Product like handbags from theLouis Vuitton Online, are very beautiful and this is why they are liked by many  girls. These wallets are also designed to suit some women who like their  beauty. Replica Louis Vuittonare among the first international  brands to be developed in france in the year 1854. Many women and girls prefer  these handbags and they are classified to be stylish and the taste of everyone.  These handbags due to their unique feature they have hit in the market. The  handbags are sold everywhere in the market all over the world. 
It is very necessary for the customers  to determine the available tips in several Louis vuitton bagswebsites. This helps the buyers to  have got enough information on the purchasing procedures and also the  differences in terms of prices. Buying through online, these products and  especially the handbags are relatively expensive in terms of money. One will  spend some several dollars on buying the product, but this is due to the  authenticity ensured by the Louis vuitton outlet. The products are of high quality and they  are neatly sewed and wonderful constructions. If the customer finds that the  product such as Louis Vuitton handbag which is going for a very low price as  compared to the others, therefore he or she should understand that it must be a  fakeLouis vuitton handbags.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.