Hypocritical, Intellectually Dishonest, Right Wing Whore Award Winner (Trophy Retired)

TODAY’S QUESTION: Is skillful political horse-trading the mark of a hero or a villian?

POINT (IT IS HEROIC): “The word "courtly" was created to describe Bruno's polite and generous manner. His image as a tough-guy boxer was accurate only until it suggested he was combative by nature. Then it couldn't have been more wrong.

He was in truth a compromiser by instinct. His negotiations weren't aimed at winning as much as creating a win-win situation. He wanted his share, and was happy to give you yours..”--Michael Goodwin in the New York Daily News (6/24/08) commenting on former NYS Senate Majority Leader Joe Bruno (a convicted felon)

COUNTERPOINT (IT IS VILLIANOUS): “The health-care debacle alone would make a classic Capra morality tale. The naked vote-buying that enabled Reid to get 60 was the very sort of insider corruption the three-time Oscar-winner despised. His reel heroes, including Jimmy Stewart, Jean Arthur, Gary Cooper and Barbara Stanwyck, would be denouncing the bill as crooked and stacked against honest, ordinary Americans.

Yet there was Obama, who promised to change the culture of Washington, heralding the sleazy outcome. How fitting that the end of his first year also marks the end of any pretense he is a reformer.

He is now the very opposite of what he promised. To support the health payoffs is to support corruption.” -- Michael Goodwin in the New York Post (12/23/09) commenting on President Barack Obama (a Nobel Laureate)



Submitted by Lou from Brooklyn (not verified) on Wed, 12/23/2009 - 7:16pm.

Two weeks without posting, and now you're letting Yoda ghost-write your pieces. Or is it Skurnik?


Submitted by Professor Frink (not verified) on Wed, 12/23/2009 - 10:04pm.
There are so many worthy contenders, it's like opening a box of chocolates.

Even the Nobel Prize can be divided three ways.
Gatemouth's picture
Submitted by Gatemouth on Thu, 12/24/2009 - 8:56am.

"Lou" from Brooklyn is a Fugazy--the Councilman spells his name L-E-W.

Professor, I must confoess, I am a little obsessed with the Goodwin/Bruno thing. As testimony rolled out detailing the ways Joe Bruno was abusing the perks of his office, this guy was still whining about how despicable it was for Spitzer to leak such wrongdoing to the press.

In fact, my obsession dates back over a year and a half:

http://www.r8ny.com/blog/gatemouth/badloss_the_daily_news_are_the_village_green_preservation_society.html
 
http://www.r8ny.com/blog/gatemouth/state_of_confusion.html
 
http://www.r8ny.com/blog/gatemouth/the_blind_man_can_t_find_the_elephant_in_the_room.html 
 
http://www.r8ny.com/blog/gatemouth/fatal_gaffes.html



Submitted by Roscoe Conway on Sun, 01/10/2010 - 7:12am.

Using the state car and driver to drive your spouse around is an abuse of the perks of one's office.  Receiving direct cash payments in exchange for cloaking another in the mantle of one's office is an abuse of the power of one's office.  I submit that there is a distinction with a difference between the two.

Bruno did both, but but what the public is capable of understanding are the helicopter rides to New York City.  The rest of it, the far more pernicious stuff, is just wayyyyy over their heads.

The test for a public official is to stop and ask, "Would I be offered this (favorable mortgage, comped hotel room, golf outing) if I were Francis Phelan?"  If you can't answer "Yes" with a straight face, you've crossed the bright line.


Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 01/12/2010 - 5:37pm.
Roscoe-a little deep in the "weeds," but great Albany reference.  I got game and I got it.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.