Now It Can Be Told: My Secret Relationship With Jonathan Judge [UPDATED X2]
SHAKESPEARE: One might say that a blog spat over the Kings County Young Republicans is the dictionary definition of much ado about nothing. Just saying... LONGINUS: Republican Hate Bloggers Are Like PraetoriansLike the "Longinus" of the longtime Christian Good Friday tradition, service with the Legions of Rome could have led one into many interesting situations. Longinus was thought to have served under Pontius Pilate in a second rate posting, Judea, administratively annexed to the more prestigious Syria. Supposedly, he led a band of local Roman irregulars from Caesarea to help quell Passover disturbances in Jerusalem. Around that time, the regular Roman Legionnaires had been held at a distance from Jerusalem, because their unbridled brutality only stirred up the Jewish rebels and made the province less governable for the Romans. By the time of Tiberius, one of the more interesting areas of service was back in Rome itself with the Praetorian Guards. Originally, bodyguards to Roman generals during the era of the Roman Republic, with the ascendancy of the certain generals in Rome, the Praetorians evolved into emperors' bodyguards. Used by the early emperors as retained enforcers within the precincts of Rome, the Praetorians' leaders (prefects) soon became active intriguers at the palace, even assassins. A similar dynamic is probably at work with THE JIG IS UP ATLAS, a Brooklyn Republican hate blog. Set up as a quick response team to do hatchet jobs on anybody critical of the regime of the elected Marty Golden and the appointed Chairman Craig Eaton. It's clear to most observers that THE JIG IS UP ATLAS has gotten very out of control. Nobody noticed when the attacks were just intra-mural Republican hits carried out on insurgent Republicans, but lately the attacks have targeted many Democratic incumbents -- and not just Carl Kruger. Several people inside the GOP have even referred to the JIG IS UP and its writers as Craig Eaton's "Frankenstein's Monster". Only recently, have they taken on ROOM EIGHT and "Gatemouth" head-on.There have been rumors that GOP Chairman Craig Eaton's might soon pull the plug on THE JIG IS UP ATLAS. However, people like Russell Gallo, a Republican District Leader and the new head of a newly recreated Brooklyn Young Republicans Club, would view that as an open rebuke to him that would diminish his place in the Kings County Republican organization. Many in the Brooklyn GOP leadership are afraid that Gallo and his "cohorts" would possibly lash back in an unpredictable fashion. MANNY LAVORRO: Gate, you have a reputation for being a decent guy.The Jig is a primitive, childish attempt by those in the Brooklyn GOP to (unsuccessfully) balance the lunatic ravings of Jonathan Judge's Atlas hate blog. For all its faults, and there are many, the Jig's transgressions pale in comparison to those of Jonathan and Atlas. You need look no further than Atlas' President's Day 2011 remarks about Lincoln's assassination being the lawful act of a group of patriotic Americans, and that the Confederate Army of 1861-1865 was the last best hope of men on earth. I won't get into the Atlas attacks on the wives and children (including those with rare genetic diseases) of GOP leaders, who have been the target of Atlas' meanspirited and cowardly assaults. Jonathan and his Atlas cohorts are a bunch of craven cowards who would never dare say such things to someone's face. They prefer to lurk in the shadows of the online world, pretending to be reformers and leaders. They are neither. As many have long wondered, how is it that the (then) President of the Brooklyn Young Republicans (at age 23) got a $46,000 a year job with his local Community Board?Gate, you and most of the readers of this blog know full well that Community Boards are one of the last bastions of Democratic clubhouse patronage in NYC. Jonathan Judge has such a patronage job because, not despite, his GOP pedigree. Someone in the Brooklyn Democratic Party wants him to have that job, and clearly wants him as a thorn in the side of the Brooklyn GOP. Have you ever wondered why that is? Surely you don't think he got the job via an ad in the classifieds, do you?
For those who have a life and real problems, and may have wandered here in error, a quick review of our story so far, which is the story of how I wandered into the middle of the ridiculous Brooklyn Republican Civil War. For those who need a roadmap of this right wing Disneyland, the Brooklyn Republican Insurgents are mostly centered around the Young Republicans and were led, until recently, by Jonathan J. Judge, an Assistant District Manager of a Flatbush Community Board. Their unofficial blog is “Atlas Shrugs in Brooklyn.”The insurgents are at war with the Regulars, which, as in most of the City means the Republican State Senate Campaign Committee, which means, in turn, that the Regular Party is the personal fiefdom of the local Republican State Senator, Marty Golden, who rules through a sock-puppet named Craig Eaton. Their unofficial blog is called “The Jig is Up Atlas.” I cannot deny that I have a fascination with marginal political figures and sometimes devote a great deal of time to covering their antics. In 2009, I devoted more than one piece to the then unknown Jimmy McMillan (no I’m not gonna link them all), which eventually paid great dividends (in ego, not money) when I started getting links from the Atlantic and on MSNBC. But despite what sometimes appears to be an obsession with the seemingly insignificant (who far too often are capable of rendering some damage), the wars among the Brooklyn GOP held no fascination for me until fairly recently.Here’s how I stepped into this dreck: After the criminal complaint was filed against my old buddy, Carl Kruger, State Republican Chair Chris Cox tried to use it as a cudgel to portray Albany corruption as a Democratic problem. In response, I noted that (1) Albany corruption has been a bi-partisan problem, though many ,if not most, of the greatest innovations in the field of Albany sleaze were pioneered by Republicans, (2) Kruger’s personal power was built mostly upon the connivance and collaboration of Albany Republicans, and (3) locally, State Senator Marty Golden and the Brooklyn GOP are structurally enmeshed with Kruger and that even though Golden had no problems in the past calling upon people to resign when accused of crimes, he had not done so with his close friend Kruger.His silence continues to this day. But Golden’s allies at “The Jig is Up Atlas” had not gotten the memo. As I noted, they began a campaign of attacking local Democrats for not calling upon Kruger to resign.This was too much for me, and I called them on their stunning hypocrisy. As a result, I become a target for abuse on “The Jig“, much of it homophobic. Yesterday, our little war continued with a full scale “Jig” offensive, in which I am accused, among other things, of being a shill for the insurgent faction of Brooklyn Republicans.Responses from friends poured in from across the nation: Sarah Steiner Does anyone involved with that blog speak or write English? Robert Rohrberger Wow. You weren't kidding about the quality of the writing. Paul Newell That may just be the worst written thing i have ever read. David Lachmann Did this guy also write the Dr. Bronner's soap label?Richard Schrader: This guy can't polish ur shoes...ur voice is more valuable than ever these days. Mole333: Wow...it is almost incomprehensible. You might be long winded (I have been asked by many to ask you to write shorter pieces, a message I have not passed on before since your style is not brief) but always precise. This guy is barely coherent. The question begs, why can't conservatives learn to write (said in a Rex Harrison voice). DJ: The question begs, what the hell are they talking about? They make less sense than Michele Bachmann. Are they claiming that you are (or were) Marty Connor's lawyer? Or are they claiming that you were born in Kenya, fer cryin' out loud?!? PABLO PERROGUIA (Senate Democratic Operative): I read it once, couldn’t understand it, so I tried again and gave up. If this is the level of “competition,” it’s time to . . . I don’t know, laugh out loud?
I have no dog in the fight among Brooklyn Republicans. To answer the post of the very civil Mr. Lavorro at the beginning of this piece, it does not surprise me that a Republican website would run Confederate propaganda. I long ago dubbed the GOP the “Party of Jefferson Davis.”In fairness, though, I should note that "The Jig” regularly refers to a Brooklyn Republican insurgent of Middle eastern origin as “The Shoe Bomber.“Of course, “The Jig” calls itself “A Place for Real Americans,” and obviously, someone of Middle Eastern origin does not, in their jaundiced and hateful view, qualify. So, on the question of which Brooklyn Republican blog is a greater offense to human decency and American values, let’s just call it a draw. If “Atlas’ is a sewer, and I’ve seen nothing which contradicts that, "The Jig" is, at best, no better. I would be proud to be named on their “Official Douche Bag List.” Why aren’t I there already? Have those bastards no respect? My position in this war is that Republicans should be ridiculous bumblers who can't win elections. Jonathan J. Judge does seem better suited at that task, but the folks at "The Jig" are certainly trying to give him a run for the money. But much of the anti-Judge narrative is lost on me. Because of the area's centralized location and ethnic diversity, Flatbush’s Community Board 14 is split between many electeds, and with no faction guaranteed control, has sort of evolved its own independent culture, and the Board Chair, Alvin Berk, has been there so long he probably believes he is the permanent government and the politicians merely serve at his pleasure. There are politics at CB#14, but they are not really "partisan politics." Anyway, does Marty Markowitz, who together with the Councilmembers, appoints CB14's members, really care about hurting Republicans? When was the last time he backed a Democrat for Mayor? Did he even endorse Golden's opponent last year? Which person who's put appointees on Board #14 cares about hurting Marty Golden? David Greenfield, who Golden helped elect? Mathieu Eugene, who gave Golden money? Mike Nelson, who endorsed Golden’s initial election to the Senate, against an incumbent Democrat, at the behest of their mutual benefactor, Carl Kruger? I could name the other Councilmembers, past and present, whose appointees still survive on the board, like Kendall Stewart, who when he ran for the State Senate, would not promise to conference with the Democrats, but I cannot name one who ever took part in any efforts to challenge Marty Golden’s hegemony. In order to believe Judge got a job because of a Machiavellian plot by local Democrats to hurt the GOP, you would have to believe the local Democrats cared. Moreover, you would have to believe they cared about hurting Marty Golden. I ask anyone to point to one piece of evidence that the Kings County Democratic Party cares about hurting Marty Golden. Except in the sense that they care about avoiding doing so, such evidence does not exist. I did not get post about “The Jig” because I care about the Brooklyn GOP's internal battles. As noted, my objection to "The Jig" is that its latest series of attacks on local Democrats (many of whom I will stipulate are turds--mostly because they help Republicans at every turn) has gone out of its way to skewer them on a matter (Kruger) where (for reason I've outlined elsewhere) “The Jig’s” hero, Golden, is more vulnerable than any of their targets. Also, “The Jig’s” prose gives me a headache. To avoid accelerating matters any further, I would gladly drop the topic entirely, but, as I’ve noted before, nothing is blessed with the appearance of eternal life (save for Alvin Berk’s tenure on CB#14) more than things posted on the internet.Therefore, even though I fear it may prolong this nonsense, I must answer some of the ridiculous assertions and insinuations made yesterday on “The Jig” during their expose concerning my perfidy. The most important charge, as far as I can decipher it, is that as a “Democratic Hack” I am involved in a plot to elevate Jonathan Judge’s standing in order to hurt Brooklyn Republicans in general, and Marty Golden in particular. Most prominently, as part of this plot, I was involved in procuring for Judge the assistance of my former boss, former state Senate Democratic Leader Marty Connor, to assist Judge as his election lawyer during Judge’s abortive 2010 campaign for a City Council seat. Where to begin: As one prominent Brooklyn Blogger noted: “They just discovered you worked for Connor or something? Are they next gonna publish an expose on how Andrew Cuomo is actually the SON of ex Governor Mario Cuomo!?!?Considering the blog probably has four people who visit per day, they're 100% worth ignoring. Are they a "hate site" though? Seems like a couple crazy bored kids” For the record, I’ve not worked for Connor since 2002; to my knowledge, the last time anyone related to me by blood or marriage managed to earn a check from Connor (through his Campaign Committee) was 2004. While Marty does remain a friend, we don’t control each other’s agenda. In 2009, Connor backed Bill DeBlasio and John Liu (both of whom had defied their friends at WFP and endorsed Connor for renomination in 2008) --I backed Mark Green and David Yassky (the only Council Member in Connor’s district who’d refused to endorse his 2008 re-nomination).That year, Connor backed three Council candidates, Alan Gerson, Bob Zuckerman and Jo Anne Simon --I endorsed none of them (though I did vote for Simon) and endorsed a different candidate against Zuckerman. Mathieu Eugene was Connor’s client; I endorsed Rock Hackshaw against him. I also endorsed Paul Newell, candidate of a club which voted to support Connor's final senate opponent, for a District Leadership. Last year, Connor represented Ruben Wills during his special election campaign; I endorsed Martha Taylor Butler. Connor did not recall talking to me about Judge at the time he was hired, and the records of my email reveal the only conversation had during that time was about David Paterson’s self and staff inflicted wounds. And Connor he had a motivation to serve as Judge’s lawyer far more compelling than my non-existent relationship with Judge. If the links supplied by “The Jig” are correct, Judge was paying Connor a lot of money. That said, I’ve never actually met Jonathan Judge, but for purposes of the truth, I will relay as much of our history (such that it is) that I can reconstruct. The 2010 Council Special Election Judge attempted to run in was really a contest between Vito Lopez’s candidate, David Greenfield, and Dov Hikind’s candidate Joe Lazar. Even though Republican had often won impressive numbers in the district, Golden decided to take a dive and backed Greenfield.Judge, responded by running himself. Though I was already on Lopez’s shit list, from which one never really exits, I was drawn into the race when Hikind and Lazar preposterously attempted to portray themselves as political reformers fighting the good for good government against the forces of Lopez. I responded by doing a point by point comparison of Lopez and Hikind, showing that Hikind and Lopez often worked hand in hand, and to the extent they had differences in their politics and modus operandi, those differences usually militated in favor of Lopez.Here is what that piece had to say about Jonathan Judge on February 22,2010 when I mentioned him for the first time. : “Let us not then say that Lazar is the anti-Lopez candidate; rather let us only say that he is among the non-Lopez candidates, and surely not the most non-Lopez among them (that would be Republican Jonathan Judge). Moreover, odds are that Lazar will remain “non-Lopez” only until such time as he either attains election, or his prime sponsor deems otherwise.” Actually, not bad. My next mention of Judge, on February 24, 2010, came in a piece where I compared the candidates themselves, rather than their mentors, and found each had right wing connections and views as distasteful as the other, but that Greenfield was clearly more impressive.However, I still refused to come out and explicitly endorse him: “It is clear that Joe Lazar will be a competent and controlled plodder perhaps making a useful contribution on mental health issues, and that David Greenfield will be an aggressive and possibly even independent go-getter, who is likely to be a really substantive player in the legislative process. Given the politics they both adhere to, I’m not sure that gives Greenfield the advantage. However, if I lived in the district, I’d likely feel differently.” The piece mentions Jonathan Judge twice; the first time I essentially call him out as a bigot: “On social issues, the best one can probably hope for from this field is lack of interest, in the manner of Simcha Felder, who’d just as soon change the topic and hope it never comes up again. David Greenfield and Joe Lazar might vote “no” on issues of interest to the LGBT community, and make a little speech, but they are probably not going to expend any political capital or use such topics to inflame the passions of their constituents. Concerning Jonathan Judge, President of the Brooklyn Young Republicans (and the only candidate who actually lived in the District before the seat became vacant), I’m not sure I can promise even that. His campaign seems mostly a matter of trying to stir up resentment against Orthodox Jews: “Not all the communities have been represented as much as some,” says Judge, “and we’re working to make sure everyone is represented in the same way,” Who between the two civilized candidates would be more tolerant? Well, Greenfield is surely more modern and worldly, while Lazar is more black-hat, but on the other hand, Lazar seems to have a slightly larger number of liberal friends (mostly courtesy of a quid pro quo for his and Dov’s endorsement in a City Council race; excepting Jim Brennan, who has high regard for Lazar’s work in the field of Mental Health)--probably a draw.” The other Judge mention occurred while I was refuting efforts to use Golden’s support of Greenfield to portray Lazar as the race’s true Democrat. I did so by demonstrating that Hikind (who was a key player in helping Golden win his initial election against a Democratic incumbent) and Lazar ( who had given Golden money and personal support) were no better that regard.In making this point I noted: “Truth be told, the only result which would discomfort Marty Golden in this race would be a victory by Jonathan Judge (who is affiliated with an anti-Golden Republican faction), and he thinks Golden is too liberal.” In the end, both Greenfield and Lazar filed specifications against Judge’s petitions. Judge was ruled off the ballot and eventually hired Connor as his Appellate lawyer. At this point, only Greenfield bothered pursing Judge. When Judge lost the appeal, he endorsed Lazar. Irony #1: While “The Jig” accuses Judge of being a Democratic cat’s paw, when Judge tried to get back on the ballot, the attorney who kept him from running was no other than Carl Landicino, the Law Chair of the Kings County Democratic Party. Irony #2: At the time, Hikind stooge Yeruchim Silber accused me of opposing Lazar because I was carrying the water of Marty Connor (who was, at that time, opposing Greenfield’s interests in court). .Irony #3: For all intents and purposes, I backed the same candidate in that race as “The Jig’s” hero, Marty Golden. What follows in the rest of my Jonathan J. Judge chronology, all of it from Facebook, unless otherwise specified: 12/7/10 I received the following message from Facebook: JONATHAN J. JUDGE WANTS TO BE YOUR FRIEND A series of messages was exchanged: GATE: Is this because I dissed Marty Golden?
12/11/10 Jonathan J. Judge: What's all the hype for Adams-Morgan about? It's got nothing on NYC and the BK.GATE: But you're in DC, so it's the best you're gonna do. Context is everything my friend Jonathan J. Judge: Gate, that's why I'll always come back to Brooklyn! 12/30/10 Jonathan J. Judge: Well, the NY Daily News caught on...Deputy Mayor Stephen Goldsmith and his flaky ideas doom New York during storm Adam Tannenbaum: I'm disappointed to see that you're taking this angle. It was foolish for the top brass not to declare a snow emergency, but privatization brings more accountability to city services. The city spends less, and if a contractor doesn't deliver, the city can relieve them of their duties and open bids for others. Jonathan J. Judge: I'm not taking this angle, per se. Goldsmith's actions, however, are at the crux of this entire fiasco. I'm merely highlighting the fact that the timing of the changes he's made were horrible, with December and January being when the demotions and layoffs are taking place just to save $25 million. I'm sure now the City just lost that savings and then some because of the way things were handled. Secondly, while I'm hardly sympathetic to the fact that elected officials cave into outrageous public sector union demands, I also think there are three agencies whose workforces require special treatment: police, fire and sanitation. They are just too crucial to keeping the city functioning to make ideological decisions when we need everyone to work together. Worse yet, not to bite the bullet and pay overtime on Christmas to make sure there was enough prep for the snow was another ideological decision that did not serve the taxpayers well at all.You also know that I am a proponent of pension reform, which has to apply to everyone. However, anyone who is from New York City knows you never screw over people when you're likely to need their full cooperation. Even if Sanitation workers may have participated in a slow down--which was also dead wrong--the Administration should have been more concerned with ensuring that the job got done right rather than rushing to save $25 million dollars so the Mayor or some City Council member can keep their slush fund. Oh, and case in point, this never was an issue under Giuliani, who is still my favorite Mayor. GATE: Barring a bankruptcy, pension reform can only be prospective --unless you are looking to impair contracts--someone who makes their career decisions over a quarter century, including forsaking slightly higher paying offers based on the pension they are in the process of earning, cannot later be told--“too bad so sad.” And, anyone who wants to try otherwise will only lose in court Adam Tannenbaum: But you can invest the pension funds (and strong-arm the unions to invest theirs) into municipal bonds that allow city and state government to continue to fund its essential operations.GATE: It's been done and when necessary should be done in a crisis situation, though outside of a crisis, the important thing is to get the best return on the investment Jonathan J. Judge: Well, the NY Daily News caught on... Deputy Mayor Stephen Goldsmith and his flaky ideas doom New York during storm: http://soc.li/g4OOIFN GATE: Fish rot from the head Johnny, real Mayors don't blame their deputies, they own up Jonathan J. Judge: Key word: REAL. Nuff said.Jonathan J. Judge: The Re-Appearance of Clarence Norman–UPDATEThe Re-Appearance of Clarence Norman–UPDATE December 30, 2010 at 11:40pm GATE: The Commodore came to pay his respects to Nucky JONATHAN J. JUDGE LIKES THIS.
2/15/11 Jonathan J. Judge: Sen. Kruger: gov’t should fine you for Walking While Listening (WWL) Sen. Kruger: gov’t should fine you for Walking While Listening (WWL)GATE: Kruger just has a problem with listening
3/2/11 Jonathan J. Judge: Democrats “Heroes of Reform”? Ha! Democrats “Heroes of Reform”? Ha!GATE: I'll grant you standing on this issue when you extend your critique to Mr. Skelos (and no, Marty Golden alone is not sufficient)
3/23/11 Jonathan J. Judge: Come to our Second Quarter Meeting and, in anticipation of the 2012 elections, learn how elections are fought and won in our Grassroots Workshop! Plus, grab a drink in support of expanding the impact of Young Republicans on politics in Brooklyn and beyond! See you there! It's Business Time - Brooklyn Young Republican Club Second Quarter MeetingLocation: Pub One Time: 6:30PM Wednesday, March 30th GATE: I wouldn’t give a first quarter to a Republican, let alone a second one
3/26/11 Jonathan J. Judge: RT @BKpolitics Here's an NY #redistricting map posted on @SwingState: http://bkpoli.tc/fRxw2p Swing State Project: NY Stand-pat MapGATE: He could easily make Meek's district blacker if he just slid a bit into Nassau
4/7/11 (On Room 8) GATE: In Brooklyn, the local Republican rebels, centered around the Young Republican Club, have Atlas Shrugs in Brooklyn, while the Golden/Craig Eaton controlled Regulars haveThe Jig Is Up Atlas.Atlas Shrugs has the redeeming feature of sometimes linking Gatemouth, but that hasn’t stopped me from making their leader, Jonathan Judge, a target for well deserved derision when merited.
4/21/11 Jonathan J. Judge: A competing GPS system? The Russian government needs to get over the fact that the Cold War ended a LONG time ago, and they lost. BBC News - Russia's new smartphone lays down challenge for GPS www.bbc.co.ukGATE: They no longer want to be the world's despot; they only seek to reinstate themselves as the region's despot.
(On Room 8): GATE: As I’ve said before, “Atlas Shrugs” has the redeeming feature of sometimes linking Gatemouth, but that hasn’t stopped me from making their leader, Jonathan Judge, a target for well deserved derision when merited, which if he were a more significant figure, would surely be more of the time.
That is the entirety of my rather ponderous relationship with Jonathan J. Judge. The other accusations in this piece and its thread are also puzzling. 1) That I am a friend of Lew Fidler’s? That is undeniable, though it hasn’t stopped us from disagreeing on candidates again and again (He supported Spitzer, I supported Suozzi; he supported The Democratic candidates for Comptroller in 2006 and 2010; I urged a vote for blogger Adam Green, and Harry Wilson. In 2009, he endorsed Steve Levin and Diana Reyna; I endorsed neither and voted for Jo Anne Simon against Levin. In 2010, he supported Dick Brodsky for AG; I endorsed Kathleen Rice; he supported Gillibrand; I endorsed Gail Goode. In the 2010 general election, he supported all the Democrats running for State Senate in his district; I endorsed the Conservative Party candidate against Carl Kruger and pointedly refused to endorse either John Sampson or Kevin Parker. He pointedly refused to support Kevin Parker in his 2008 primary; I backed the schmuck. I‘m sure there are instances as well). 2) That I support equal rights for LGBT people. I plead nolo contendre. 3) That I am a leftist? I guess that depends on how one defines the term, but I don’t think any local blogger’s taken as much abuse from self-described “Progressives” as I. Further, Ben Smith once called me a “conservative Democrat” on Politico, forcing me to beg him to change that description to “centrist Democrat” (he did). Let’s just say I am a contrarian; for instance, I think’s there’s nothing “progressive” about saving LIFO. However as the President of the Brownstone Republican club Notes: But locally, even as Gatemouth is firmly Left, he is well-known for an equal-opportunity, never-ending exposure. Opinion can be proven wrong, but they're expressions of an understanding -- and brought nearly to an art-form. 4) That I’m a “former hack.” I suppose I should thank them for the use of the word “former.” 5) That I once served on a Community Board. True. How this connects me to Judge, who is a paid employees of a different board on the other side of the Borough, is something my limited brain power has trouble grasping. 6) That I tend to oppose Republicans and support Democrats. Mostly true. Prior to last year, almost totally true. However, I’ve been more supportive of getting rid of Carl Kruger than either Golden, Eaton or “The Jig” was during the period before Kruger was arrested, and probably still more supportive of such efforts than either Golden or Eaton. 7) That I don’t care for State Senator Marty Golden Well, despite Golden’s efforts to prevent them, that is why we have elections. 8) That I appreciate it when people link me. Guilty as charged. (I apologize that some facts here which could be documents by a link are not, but talking about the “Jig is Up Atlas” is so tiresome and tiring, so I finally quit). UPDATE: In the second part of their attack on my character and politics, the schmucks at “The Jig” attempt to undermine my credibility by showing me to be a liar.First they take issue with this statement, which I made to show I was not beholden to Marty Connor: “For the record, I’ve not worked for Connor since 2002; to my knowledge, the last time anyone related to me by blood or marriage managed to earn a check from Connor (through his Campaign Committee) was 2004.” In response, “The Jig” correctly points out that I did GIVE Money to Connor in 2008. I never said I did not. In fact, though they did not point it out, so did my wife. I am not sure how this, as opposed to Connor giving me money, is supposed to show I owe Connor a favor; and certainly, the amounts involved are a less convincing explanation for why Connor argued Jonathan J. Judge’s ballot access appeal, than the $5000 and change Judge paid him Other than that, part two accuses me being friends with Lew Fidler (which I copped to in part one). This is supposed to undermine the credibility of the things I said against potential Fidler opponent Fred Kreizman, and is the sort of thing one prints to undermine a writer’s credibility when printing the facts would be of no help to you.I am also accused of eating lunch with someone. This sometimes happens, but rarely. Usually, at lunch time, I sit alone and read the papers, because that is what I prefer to do. Finally, for no apparent reason, Carl Kruger is accused of being a Democratic State Senator. This is true only in the technical sense .UPDATE #2: "The Jig" is up with another piece, which even in the context of "The Jig" is not worth linking. In it, they prove they don't understand the word "you're" is not the same as the word "your." They also prove they don't know the difference between a lawyer and a client and which pays who. Finally, they call out a Democrat for not calling for Carl Kruger's resignation, but have still not managed to call out the one elected official who's most benefitted from Kruger's support: Marty Golden. Despite my long record as a Kruger detractor, I do not believe elected officials of any party should be calling for Kruger's resignation, because I believe Kruger is entitled to the presumption of innocence. However, Marty Golden has made clear, by previously calling for the resignation of elected officals who've been charged with crimes, that he does not believe in the presumption of innocence. Therefore, I ask "The Jig" to answer this? When will you be calling upon Marty Golden to call for Kruger's resignation? If you cannot answer this question, then please STFU! RACIST ME? LOL.
![]() If dealing with truths around the issue of race gets me this attack, then so be it. Funny how no one ever deals with the substance of my articles on race. How can republicans recognize a racist when they can't even recognize it in their own positions and policies. Why do half of them still believe Barack Obama wasn't born a citizen? LATENT RACISM.
reply | email this comment
It's unsurprising that they've taken a bit of a fascination in ya Gatey. "Jiggers" are, on their very premise, an attack blog on a very low-level institution not really worth attacking with such vigor (one particular faction of Young Republicans in a county largely dominated by Democrats). So they latch onto new things as they appear in front of them. Rock, you can think what you want about the mainsteam or even conservative Republican approach to race in America, but when a group like Judge's hate blog Atlas calls Lincoln's assassination "the patriotic act" of loyal American citizens carrying out a "lawful" order, or that the Confederate Army was "the last best hope of men on earth" it's clear that this group is beyond racist. As to Obama's citizenship ... Republicans (and all Americans) ought to hope and pray that the birther nonsense goes away. If the GOP was right, it would tear our nation apart, and be the end of America. Howard was beat at his own fact game, you have been owned.
...wouldn't know a fact if it grabbed your balls after you dropped the soap. I said I hadn't been paid by Connor for years, and you counter that with proof of almost the opposite point. You conjecture a story about me and a person I've never met out of whole cloth. You guys make Rock's "Vines" columns look look like temples of accuracy. . Craig Eaton and Marty Golden clearly have no shame. They must openly disassociate themselves from you (and Carl Kruger as well). Sort of like how Lew Fidler should do the same with you. By the way is it me or did you say this. "the last time anyone related to me by blood or marriage managed to earn a check from Connor (through his Campaign Committee) was 2004.” That's funny you gave a check in 2008 didn't you, so much for facts right? Didn't you also say this. "I am also accused of eating lunch with someone. This sometimes happens." Looks like that happened to me, since there is no "Timmy McKennedy" as a Republican activist from Bay Ridge or lives in Bay Ridge. Than again no real Republican activist would meet with a former patronage hack, save for Jonathan Judge and your good pal from Bay Ridge not named Timmy McKennedy. Didn't you also say this. "Other than that, part two accuses me being friends with Law Fidler (which I copped to in part one)." It's "Lew", by the way I thought you would have known that from your such great grammar skills. Leave it to a "Liberal", to be such a "Hypocrite" when it comes to grammar. Howie you have been owned, but I can see your enjoying this, is Lew from Brooklyn enjoying this though, we can only wonder... Kevin, you miss the point entirely, so let me explain it to you real, real slow. I have not paid your mother to such my dick since 2004. The fact that she paid me last week for the right to do so, does not mean that she is any longer a whore. Get it? I can see your very mad so let me explain it to you real, real, real, real slow. You lost, your a hypocrite, and you have been owned. Get, it? What does it all matter? We've established that the basic thesis of your article is a lie. I do not know Jonathan Judge. I not only did not support his effort to run for City Council, but I for all intents and purposes supported the candidate who knocked him off the ballot, who was also the candiate that Marty Golden backed. The only relevance of my connection to Connor is to prove that I had something to do with Judge & Lazar during that race, and that is a lie with a paper trail a mile long disproving it. Shall I reprint here all the hateful things Lazar's supporters said about me at the time? I included the line about my work for Connor because I wanted to establish that my being beholden to him financially was something very distant in time. The fact that I gave him a couple hundred dolalrs three years ago does not make me beholden to him, and it certainly does not obligate him to take a retainer from a candidate I was not supporting and had practically called a bigot. So I ask, what have you proven besides your complete and utter disregard for the truth? You don't like real Republicans blogging about the truth. We get that. That's too bad, that's not going to stop. However, thank you for confirming the fact Jonatha Judge is a bad republican. Thank you for confirming the fact you gave Connor a check when you said you didn't, and thank you for confirming Connor has earned a lot of money for kicking people off the ballot. I said neither I or any one related to me had earned any money from Connor in the past few years. That remains a true statement. If I had dome so, that would make me somewhat beholden to him. I never said anything about campaign contributions, and I do not see how my small campaign contributions to Connor in 2008 connects me to work Connor did for money in 2010 for a candidate I demonstrbly did not support. If you refuse to explain how my contribution to Connor connects me to Jonathan Judge, who I've never met or spoken to, then you are admitting you make it all up from whole clothe. And if you do explain it, it will probably be made up from whole clothe as well. You claim you didn't work for Connor, but yet you worked for the very same minority he ran. You meekly defended your friend, and prove you could never flat out call him out on his political life being cashed by the man you hate. Which you by the way have been called out on in a few blog sites in the past. You did however confirm for us Jonathan Judge is not a real Republican, you ducked the topic of Jonathan Judge's open support for criminals, not to mention his being tossed out not once, not twice, but three times from the Bay Ridge Community Council and The New York State Young Republicans which are not run by Marty Golden or Craig Eaton, you support Jim McCall, which is like supporting a Democrat and you continue to read the jig is up atlas. By the way here's a link for you. http://thejigisupatlas.blogspot.com/2011/04/while-admitting-truths-howard-gatemouth.html Toodles. "You claim you didn't work for Connor, but yet you worked for the very same minority he ran." I never said anything of the sort; I worked for connor twice; once for four months, and once for seven and one half year. That last period came to an end in 2002. "You meekly defended your friend, and prove you could never flat out call him out on his political life being cashed by the man you hate." Huh? Which friend; which guy i hate? "Which you by the way have been called out on in a few blog sites in the past." Huh? "You did however confirm for us Jonathan Judge is not a real Republican, you ducked the topic of Jonathan Judge's open support for criminals, not to mention his being tossed out not once, not twice, but three times from the Bay Ridge Community Council and The New York State Young Republicans which are not run by Marty Golden or Craig Eaton," Don't know enough to comment about this. It's among the Republicans and I could care less. "you support Jim McCall, which is like supporting a Democrat" I did not support McCall when he ran for Judge, and even though Noach turned out far better than oen would guess, I am still ashamed I did not. You should be ashmaed too that you did not. "and you continue to read the jig is up atlas." You are correct. I should really stop doing that, and so shoudle very decent person. On December 30, 2009 "The Jig is Up Atlas" began operating by posting, the following statement(s): "Coming Soon". On December 31, 2009, "The Jig is Up Atlas" attempted or made a direct communication with "AAA" as follows: "A Call to Potential Contributors" *** "If you are interested in writing, please contact us. *** AAA- where are you???" Sometime later on that day, "The Jig is Up Atlas" posted "The Question Begs?" by "AAA" and following the December 31, 2009 posting, "The Question Begs? " by "AAA": "The Jig Is Up Atlas said... *** Welcome back to the discussion AAA." to which came the response "AAA said... *** The question begs, this reform minded commentator thanks the great staff at The Jig is Up Atlas for supporting the Truth. *** The question begs, as the answer has been allowed to be given." The postings and commentary thread contained on "The Jig is Up Atlas" by "AAA" and "The Jig is Up Atlas" On December 31, 2009 indicate a prior communication, understanding and coordination in the start-up, and the initial postings and operation of the "The Jig is Up Atlas" between "AAA" and "The Jig is Up Atlas". On January 31, 2010 "The Jig is Up Atlas" bragged that "Any reporter that 'googles' [certain names on 'The Jig is Up Atlas' enemies list] are directed here and can find out what's really goin on." "The Jig is Up Atlas" has held itself out to the public as a "Hate Blog". In fact, for some time during 2010 "The Jig is Up Atlas" made the following statement and solicitation: "Wanna Join The Brooklyn GOP Hate Blog? Remain anonymous and e-mail us to get the ball rolling". ...for a million years will eventually type out a Shakespeare play, or so posited mathematician Emile Borel. The same million monkeys flinging feces at a wall for about 1.5 minutes would produce the entire Jig Is Up oeuvre, posits Roscoe Conway. Oh, and any money any election lawyer makes is from holding candidates - whether their clients, or opponents - to the requirements of the Election Law, as the Board of Elections is itself not empowered to do on its own initiative. Fraudsters and phonies get thrown off the ballot, not candidates with basic literacy skills and a modicum of integrity. There's a reason why the Election Law is regarded as New York's Candidate IQ Test, and a reason why bottom-feeding hacks hate election lawyers until their meal ticket needs one.
Is that James McCall talking about "Hate" blogging? The same James McCall rumored to have attacked charities, the catholic church, his own priest, women, and an active duty military solider? Somebody could post those comments, but that would show there is a lot of time on people's hands, like James McCall...
Kiss, Kiss. Howard learn how to spell. "shoudle very decent person." Seriously your grammar stinks like your mouth.
Roscoe is a guy who worked for Marty Connor who no longer lives in NY. He's a Room 8 regular.
Leave it to out of towners to defend those who kick candidates off the ballot especially when it comes to there former boss. Than again they certainly couldn't get them back on the ballot especially when it comes to the biggest loser of them all Jonathan Judge. "Lonesome Traveller" wonders if "Not so quick Roscoe Jones," the "Saucy Harry Klein," or perhaps even (the relatively insipid, but also relatively deep-pocketed) Craig Eaton might be able to provide some specifics as to their defamatory attacks on somebody who should be very well known to them and whose details of any such allegations should be readily available, if true. We doubt that Harry and Craig might be able to say anything factual about YKW’s, "attacking Republican Chairman Craig Eaton about helping his own church...." If they could make that claim stick, that might be very serious, if indeed they could prove it and of course if there weren't a very legitimate basis for the purported "attack" on Mr. Eaton. It would also be a very interesting insight if "Klein" or Eaton could opine as to why "a strong catholic, conservative" like YKW might do such a public and obviously humiliating thing to the perhaps too impetuous and too thin-skinned Craig Eaton. Mr. Klein or Mr. Eaton might also explain how and why spreading stories that YKW, "was also rumored to support an anti-Virgin Mary picture by a Democrat friend of his..." advances any political, social or religious cause, unless it's only the cause of Eaton’s faction of the Brooklyn Republican Party ( btw, wasn't that the exact "anti-Virgin Mary picture" that was reportedly sent to various religious people by Eaton's own supporters and also posted on Eaton's GOP hate blog "The Jig is Up Atlas"?) "Not so fast Roscoe Jones" only seems to dabble in repeating and republishing rumors of the libels and slanders of others, like this: YKW is "rumored to have attacked charities, the catholic church, his own priest...." Just whose "rumors" are those? Maybe those "rumors" only involved direct communications with that priest’s lawful superiors (these are lesser problems of some very young priest, with a very strange priestly vocation-career path, which apparently have been dealt with privately between the priest and his superiors ). Do these "rumors" involve unrelated public charges made about coverups of major issues by the big man of Golden’s and Eaton’s "CC" Cabal, major issues that are still ravaging the Church from within, leaving it wide open to attacks from without. Since these matters still really need to be fully aired, exposed to the disinfecting sunlight of truth and be allowed to be fully addressed in various OPEN FORUMS, ecclesiastic, criminal and civil, perhaps Klein, Jones and/or Eaton can engage in a full discussion of their public positions on those matters. Of course, Messrs. Jones, Klein and Eaton probably only care about this major blight effecting the Church, if some personal political hay can be made of it. Attacks on currently serving military members: we doubt that either "Harry Klein" or "Roscoe Jones" could pull any of those out of their .... hats: What attacks? What currently serving members? If they could do so, that too might be very bad. (This "Lonesome Traveller" only knows about the attacks in and by "The Jig is Up Atlas" by the Brooklyn Republicans under Eaton on the former Marine combat service record of Congressman Grimm, while he was in his primary fight against Craig Eaton's very unsuitable and inappropriate candidate [whose family gave lots of dollars to Eaton’s charity – anybody else see that as a problem?], which charges against Grimm were picked up and used by others after the primary in the general election).
In my opinion James McCall just tipped his hand here in that response, clearly somebody is bothered about something somebody likely said that likely hit a nerve. It's also been rumored McCall has never come clean about his own military record, while claiming Russell Gallo a political enemy of his was a fake military personnel when Gallo is a decorated war hero, and active duty solider. It's also been rumored McCall regularly attends his local Democratic club meetings, and has even commented about them on the atlas shrugs blog. It's also been rumored McCall was told by those leaders who he in his own words were long time pals of his to stop blogging about the meetings because it was making them look bad. Here's something that's not a rumor why is it that McCall's own home Republican club has never put him in any kind of leadership, and why would a conservative Republican allow there household to donate money to non conservatives Hillary Clinton and Joanne Seminara.
That's a very quick change in the lineup. No Saucy Klein, no slow moving Roscoe and no deep pockets Eaton. Or more accurately, no hits, no runs and it looks like a lot of errors for the other side. First, notice the quick and absolute change of subject away from the King of Charity in Public, Craig Eaton, or Mister Widow's Mite -- lite! Very, very, very lite! Craig, keep up the good work; just crank it down a few decibles. Same applies -- about the Church stuff, just like somebody kinda big probably told you right after that last blowup with YKW. Second, see how the "YKW attacks those serving in the military issue" changed into what was YKW's military record. YKW has never made any claims about his own military service. Also YKW never said "Sarge Gallo" was "a fake military personnel". But since good old Henry Johnson did bring it up, how are we supposed to know whether it's true that "Gallo is a decorated war hero, and active duty solider" ? We don't even know where Gallo is most of the time, and who knows whether he ever even had to fight his way to the front of a chow line, much less get decorated for doing so. Henry or Craig or Russell can you get back to us on that one ASAP, we'd like to get this sorry chapter on Gallo out of the way quickly, before we really go after him for something else ... Brooklyn GOP Blog Radio ... really nice talk, Sergeant Russell Gallo, really nice talk..... As for some of Henry Johnson's new flak: we don't know of any Republican, especially YKW, that regularly attends Democratic meetings. Ask YKW's Democratic "friends," a few of whom do happen to run Democratic meetings locally in Bay Ridge and some other place in Brooklyn, when YKW was last at a Democratic meeting; or even better how many times since 2007. YKW would guess maybe about once a year per club, to date. If that's what Eaton and the Brooklyn GOP counts as "regular" attendance, then that shows a real problem with Eaton's GOP. We're also certain that YKW's Democratic friends have never mentioned YKW's blogging, because they have no interest in whether YKW blogs or not. As for YKW's "home club" leadership positions, YKW's position has been openly Shermanesque -- enough said -- but if Eaton wants to try to undermine them like the 49th AD Club....... As for YKW's wife's support for certain Democrats, well that's probably no worse than her support for Marty Golden. Not that I care, but I am under the impression that his work rules would forbid him to hold elected office in a political club.
Speaking of changing subjects wasn't it likely James McCall who was the one first attacking charities, a fellow parishioner of his, no less for his sick son? How sad, really how sad, how non catholic, and non-conservative. Wasn't it James McCall's own priest along with several parishioners who correctly called him out on his very disturbing attacks? They sure did. Wasn't it rumored James McCall who mentioned his own time in the National Guard in an atlas shrugs comment, but never when in depth to what it was, and than went on to attack an active duty solider? Sure sounds possible. Wasn't it also James McCall rumored to have openly supported more Democrats than Republicans in the past ten years alone, again not to mention no objection of his other half giving money to Democrats very liberal ones, including one who endorsed his own campaign for office? I mean it's one thing to support a Democrat, but it's another to give $500 to Hillary Clinton, unless part of that money could have been possibly from YKW... After all no real Republican activist has ever seen James McCall do the real work to help a Republican candidate. Ask even his sometimes friend Lucretia Regina-Potter, as we never saw McCall voulnteer once in the 49th AD former Bari Tile Headquarters for Lucretia Regina-Potter. No real honest conservative Republican or no real person who is pro-life would ever take one time Green endorsed candidate Joanne Seminara's support of course if your not a real conservative Republican. However, is it me or does James McCall refer to himself in the third person likely acknowledging a severe mental problem doesn't it... 1. About the charities, whether likely or not, it didn't happen. What says Eaton? 2. Non-Catholic -- non-conservative? To what is YKZ referring? 3. Priest and Parishioners? -- no they didn't -- never a word to YKW. The priest was put in his place by superiors and his blog was shut down; YKW's fellow parishioners -- never a peep and YKW knows lots of fellow parishioners ... 4. Doesn't sound remotely possible; YKW never was in the National Guard -- maybe that was State Senator Golden; and what attack on what active duty soldier -- maybe that was State Senator Golden, too? 5. More rumors: endorsed more Democrats than Republicans -- last ten years -- whose rumors are they? Not even remotely possible and certainly not true. Not even the ones who did endorse YKW in 2007. 6. YKW has never seen any of the real Republican activists in Brooklyn that YKZ is talking about, but YKW believes that "... the loveliest of all is the unicorn..." 7. Joanne Seminara's a fine professional and lovely person, and her brother pitched in the major leagues. YKW would probably have to disagree about what YKZ said about YKW's accepting her support, since YKW was very thankful to have had it; and since YKW really holds those socially conservative Republican positions --- Q.E.D. YKZ is just wrong. 8. YKW refers to himself in the third person because he wants to mimic somebody who's holding an office that YKW might be seeking shortly. YKW does agree with YKZ that doing so is a little funky. Case in point: some people say that Russell Gallo ( also referred to above as "Sarge" Gallo or Sergeant Russell Gallo) is as much of a problem in the Brooklyn GOP Establishment as the man for whom he is fronting, GOP Chairman Craig Eaton. Those people don’t even know the half of it.... Look out, the next fork in the road is "The Brooklyn GOP Radio - Twilight Zone"! Gallo is the crown prince and, for now, heir apparent Eaton’s spot as the Chairman of the KCRP Executive Committee (top gunsel in Marty Golden’s "Run the Brooklyn GOP solely for the benefit of Golden gang"). In addition to his post as an elected member of the Republican State Committee from the 47th AD, Russell Gallo is reported to be a regular contributor to Eaton’s hate blog, The Jig is Up Atlas, a host of Brooklyn GOP Radio (a weekly blog-cast), and the recently "recognized" head of the "Official ‘Brooklyn Young Republicans Club’". From these positions Gallo has made himself an indispensable part of Chairman Craig Eaton’s control apparatus. For instance, he was recently singled out as the most important speed bump to the quick approval of an "Executive Director" put up by Eaton, because she didn’t have the full support of the "other" leaders – in reality, some say that it all was Eaton’s way of keeping the prospective Exec D and her main supporter on a short leash before finalizing things. Although some of the worst material in The Jig is Up Atlas has been recognized as emanating from Gallo, so far he has been able to remain concealed behind a formal anonymity (using a pseudonym that mocks insurgent reformer Jonathan Judge). Gallo is not able to stay similarly concealed on the weekly GOP blog-radio program. In the most recent Brooklyn GOP Radio show alone, between assorted fade-outs, cut-offs, heavy breathing and bathroom breaks, Gallo uttered the following: "Obama is the big thing...the first thing that pissed me off today [it was the President’s sending $25 Million to Libyan rebels, whom Gallo says include Al-Qaeda ].... HE’S A PUNK ( referring to the President)...he just did it because he felt like it." And when the talk turned to Donald Trump, Russell Gallo agreed that Trump was a "hero" because, "The ‘Birther’ issue is a legitimate issue; this guy (President Obama) needs to show his birth certificate, bottom line....this is the greatest constitutional crisis in this nation’s history..." When the others on the program argued that such tactics made Trump look like a bomb thrower, Gallo asserted, "[Then] Donald Trump is throwing the bomb that needs to be thrown." The last thing that we heard Gallo yelp about President Obama was, "He’s a bum, F— ’im, he’s a bum." For now, Gallo’s main function in the Brooklyn GOP appears to be that he makes Craig Eaton look and feel normal, rational and relatively in control. BUT – wasn’t there a "Twilight Zone" episode where the ventriloquist becomes the "dummy" sitting on the man’s lap, and the dummy "Willie" becomes the ventriloquist..... "What's known in the parlance of the times as the old switcheroo, from boss to blockhead in a few uneasy lessons. And if you're given to nightclubbing on occasion, check this act. It's called "Willie & Jerry" [Craig and Russell], and they generally are booked into some of the clubs along 'Gray Night Way' known as the Twilight Zone." [Rod Serling] In my opinion is James McCall attacking a good honest conservative Republican like Russell Gallo, someone who actually supports Republicans, something we haven't really seen McCall do? Referring to old tv show's, old movie's, which is a key interest of McCall's according to friends and foes alike. McCall just give it up, you used to be a good, honest, Democrat, from Joe Ferris's club to now where you have become in my opinion a deranged, pathetic, blogger who attacks charities, military soliders, Catholics, and now Republicans.
This time THEY even tried to steal the good name of Wag The Dog. We keep trying to retire "WTD"; but like Michael Corleone once said, "Just when I thought that I was out they pull me back in." Eaton’s guys, get your history right.... "Gatemouth" now has a much better idea of somebody’s Democratic Party provenance than the "phony Wag The Dog’s" version that was largely glommed from the Gatester’s earlier published material . Somebody’s association with CBID was brief and fleeting, having much more to do with Peter McNeill Lorraine Conroy, Charlie Monahan and the Carrolls, especially the patriarch, than Joe Ferris. Somebody’s longer-term Democratic Party association was out of the Regular Democratic Club of the 51st A.D., whose Leaders were "Tony and Louise" and whose key members were CC Maj L Tom C and "Get-the-Car " Ray T; School Board Bea D, Andy D and Big Nick B; Honey F; Gilda P and Sidney G; Windsor Bill C and 10th Avenue Joe Favs. In 1982 JPM ran for the Assembly in the 51st A.D. against both incumbent Joe Ferris and the "Regular" challenger Andy D (Ferris won re-election in the primary with a mere plurality and never ran for the seat after 1982). Plenty of Republicans and Conservatives have worked along with our somebody over the last twenty-five years on his races and those of others. As to the "phony Wag The Dog’s" opinion that somebody is "a deranged, pathetic, blogger who attacks charities, military soliders [sic/sic], Catholics, and now Republicans....", more of the same Jig is Up Atlas flap-doodle – just more defamation and libel with no factual basis or nexus to anything true; and not even close to fair comment and criticism . You forgot about Porfirio Placenta (yes, i know the real name was Plasencia, but everyone always called him Placneta).
As to the "phony Wag The Dog’s" opinion that somebody is "a seo companies deranged, pathetic, blogger who attacks charities, military soliders [sic/sic], Catholics, and now Republicans....", more of the same Jig is Up Atlas flap-doodle – just more defamation seo and the client libel with no factual basis or nexus to anything true; and not even close to fair comment and criticism .
Replica louis vuitton handbags sale now,Buy louis vuitton replica at amazing cheap price,all the replica louis vuitton handbags free shipping now. wallet, Luggage,Purses for cheap now, come up with new fashions every day,our replicas must be you best .We are professional replica louis vuittonaccessories provider and offer cheap.Louis Vuitton bags have attractive appearance and top-quality design. replica lv bagsare one of the favorite products in the world. Louis Vuitton is so convenient.
Replica louis vuitton handbags sale now,Buy louis vuitton replica at amazing cheap price,all the replica louis vuitton handbags free shipping now. wallet, Luggage,Purses for cheap now, come up with new fashions every day,our replicas must be you best .We are professional replica louis vuittonaccessories provider and offer cheap.Louis Vuitton bags have attractive appearance and top-quality design. replica lv bagsare one of the favorite products in the world. Louis Vuitton is so convenient.
You can certainly see your skills within the work you write. The sector hopes for more passionate writers like you who aren't afraid to mention how they believe. All the time go after your heart.
Post new comment |