Out of the Rotation

(This article has now been corrected twice to reflect the ever changing reality)

Those who’ve noticed my recent hiatus probably need to get a life. But, if you care, it’s at least partially attributable to recent efforts, on at least three different sites in the last month, to attribute an identity to my posts. These are probably all the effort of one particular blogger (the person most likely responsible for jefffeldmanmustgo and perhaps other sites as well) whose anonymity I will respect by referring to him only as “fat ugly smelly toothless bastard”.

 The person this particular blogger has targeted for exposure as “Gatemouth” is an extremely small-time political operative/hanger on, who actually seems to be pretty much out of the game, and who mostly manifests himself these days as a civic gadfly, the sort of guy who stands up at meetings and speaks out in favor of putting the shelter in his own neighborhood. One of “fat ugly smelly toothless bastard”’s posts made a veiled threat concerning this person’s employment. As the person targeted is not very popular, somewhat unpleasant, and perhaps a little nuts, such speculation is bound to wear upon one’s own fragile ego (this is who they think I am?), as is the very real possibility that someone will eventually get it right, and target my own livelihood as well. Since I’m not making any money from this blog (yet), is it really worth the schtuss? I might say yes, but others to whom I owe some level of responsibility would perhaps differ on the matter were they were better aware of the situation (my closet is of “walk-in” size).  

            By contrast, the parody of my style recently posted on “Room 8” was actually kind of nice; imitation being the sincerest form of flattery. Given the politics of that post, my suspicion would be that it emanated from “fat ugly smelly toothless bastard”, were it not for the fact that the post was a somewhat witty, well argued, if occasionally paranoid, piece of balderdash, rather than one of the vicious “Charles Whitman” (google it) jobs usually associated with this human personification of a bag of excrement wrapped in an excessive amount of sweaty skin.  

To better illustrate his modus operandi, let me provide an example of how “fat ugly smelly toothless bastard” works. In posts on several blogs and his own personal mailing list, “fat ugly smelly toothless bastard” has committed the “blood libel” of essentially accusing David Yassky of conspiracy to commit arson and depraved indifference homicide, because Yassky received campaign contributions from some developers (I initially, although not on this site, attributed this to Chris Owens’ campaign, for which he has my most profuse apologies). To be fair, this is partially Yassky's fault, as a large cash payment to "fat ugly smelly toothless bastard" could have probably avoided all this inconvenience. Not surprisingly, “fat ugly smelly toothless bastard” now apparently serves as a consultant to a Yassky opponent who, incidentally, is so pro-development that the candidate is financially supported by the Ratner family. Wow! As “fat ugly smelly toothless bastard” likes to say, “How do you make an elephant disappear in a room full of people? Misdirection!”.  I will add that “fat ugly smelly toothless bastard”’s purported and publicly expressed outrage over Yassky running as a white in a minority district is inconsistent with his own long record serving as a consultant to such candidates (although in fairness to “fat ugly smelly toothless bastard”, it should be noted that one of these clients was not a real candidate, but merely involved in a “Ponzi” type scheme to successfully milk the City’s campaign finance system for the pecuniary benefit of his family).   

Getting back to my point, my own personal and self-interested opinion is that blogger etiquette concerning anonymity serves the larger purpose of facilitating the spread of “the truth”; certainly not the objective truth, but more often than not, an accurate rendering of the world as the poster really sees it. While I respect some of those who use their real names, the fact is that most posters who reveal their identities (Jerry Skurnik a notable exception) are either self serving, cranks, or both. If everyone who posted on a political blog had to reveal their name, sites like this, Politicker  and Daily Politics would be extremely boring, much more compact and largely a matter of public realtions.

Transparency in the blog world would be a greater enemy to free speech than either George W or Islamo-fascism. While anonymous posts have their own problems, the use of pseudonyms actually achieves a somewhat happy compromise. The repeated and consistent use of handles by pseudonymous bloggers leaves a paper trail which allows one to examine their records for consistency and factual accuracy. While we are not transparent, the best of us are certainly translucent. 

 All I will say about Gatemouth, the character I play on the web, is that he regards this site as a year-round Yom Kippur where he can publicly repent every day for his sins, and even more so for all the incredible acts of evil he's committed over the years in the service of good causes. As I once wrote to Enwhysea Wonk,  we can all criticize "the closet" for the way it hurts an entire community, but we must also respect the personal decisions of others, unless their behavior is such that it robs them of their right to demand their privacy (and even them, we must err on the side of  circumspection).


When I started blogging on “Room 8”, I set a target of posting three times a week, with the eventual goal of spinning off on my own (a couple a hundreds bucks of advertising revenue per week being my only real agenda). Meeting this goal while pursuing a career elsewhere required too many sacifices in the way of time and writing quality; and while I may eventually return to posting at such a rate, for now, I will be content to contribute an occassional essay only sporadically, whenever the fancy strikes me, and I will try my best to resist the temptation to discuss the politics of “the Borough of Homes and Churches”, which is clearly a third rail. I know this will break the hearts of the guys at leftbehinds.blogspot.com (I love you guys too), and cheer too many people who certainly don’t deserve it (I suggest that “fat ugly smelly toothless bastard” celebrate by taking a shower), but it sure beats admitting you have a bad case of writer’s block and nothing of interests about which to fulminate, which, sad to say, constitutes most, if not quite all, of the objective truth.  
 



Submitted by Antid Oto (not verified) on Sun, 05/21/2006 - 3:39pm.

But...

     But...

         But...

We'll miss you.

Shit.


Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sun, 05/21/2006 - 6:36pm.
Get lost . And stay lost.
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sun, 05/21/2006 - 10:38pm.

"tis a far better thing I do now, than  I ever done...tis a far better place that I go...'

Gatey,

You're about as dramatic as William Shatner (LOL).

Consider for a moment that the object of your scorn is guilty of everything you say  (you know, those of us in the political game are loving the way you are calling him out- I mean with that description, who else could it be?!!!LOL)...except for the so-called blood libel postings.

Thank you!  for your remarks about my use of movie quotes in my postings was extremely flattering. (By the way, that quote was from "Swordfish"- a really good movie). But I'm horrified that you would attribute all my hard investigative work to someone else. But there is satisfaction that you once again misfired and made another false accusation.

It was hilarious to sit back and watch you make those accusations of Chris. I think what really bothers you is that you were so arrogant in your assumptions, you were careless in attacking Owens. And then you realized how wrong you were, I think your ego couldn't take it- thus this dramatic exit. Or maybe you just couldn't take the heat of being a blogging celebrity. You should really be more careful about writing in anger. You're a much better writer when you are speaking from a historical and intellectual viewpoint.

I will say that I'm sorry to see you go. Your discussions with Rock are priceless and like sitting in a Politics 101 class. And I will always treasure the brief back-n-forth we shared under one of my nom de plume's "wigger". It was like an episode of HBO's Real  Sex.

In closing,  I leave you with another movie quote-

"The greatest trick the Devil ever pulled was making the world believe he didn't exist."

The one thing you can always count on about white male arrogance- they never consider the unexpected (I was like the hand up Mona Lisa's skirt- you never expected it.)

Ta-ta, Gatey- of all the souls I have encountered, yours was the most....(sob)...human.


Submitted by Gate (not verified) on Mon, 05/22/2006 - 6:56am.

23:38:

Which "blood libel" posts? There may have been competing sets.

The first I saw was forwarded to me by a friend; and was written by "fat ugly smelly toothless bastard"; in fact, it came from his email list fustbprinter@loser.com and was clearly written in his style, as were some of the subsequent posts spreading the "news". He may have stolen it from you, but he seems to have spread it far better; and it's no doubt that stopyassky is his website; so maybe he's the Lenny Bruce to your poor unrecognized  Joe Ancis (now there's an obscure cultural reference for you). My big mistake was thinking Owens had hired FUSTB; Chris is clearly not as dumb as his father.  

Your post is a great mind-fuck, and together with mine and Brooklyn Fats', deserves to be anthologized in a collection of the all-time wierdest posts on an NYC  political blog (along with such moments as Judith Membaltt's meltdown-btw, I originally thought she was FUSTB).  
 


Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 05/22/2006 - 9:04am.
More like he's the Richard Pryor to my Paul Mooney...take heart, there are worse things in life...

Submitted by EnWhySeaWonk on Mon, 05/22/2006 - 9:30am.

I'll miss you, too, GM....

I don't know if anyone has missed me for the last week and half since I posted, but I can admit that I do have writer's block--or at least that I have a profound sense of boredom regarding what's been going on lately in New York politics. David Yassky is White! (boring) Eliot's winning! (yawn). Giuliani is an asshole (zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz). Hmmm, maybe I can find a political angle on the new Apple Store, it would make a pretty picture for my post.


Submitted by anon (not verified) on Mon, 05/22/2006 - 10:23am.
Some of us would like to know the identity of Gatemouth....Jewish gay Brooklynite with green card carrying male domestic partner with illegal female domestic help.....who is this person?  Please someone name him?
Submitted by mole333 (not verified) on Mon, 05/22/2006 - 10:46am.

Oh...well. Yawn.

 Personally I think the whole "blog anonymity" thing is BS for coward. Nothing more than an excuse to say whatever you want "on a hunch" without suffering the consequences. It's like a politician who ran way from the draft only to become a hawk later in life. People know who I am and I meet them face to face when I write something. Sometimes that's kind of awkward. But I find it honest and fair to let people confront me and to have to take consequences for what I write.

I know several people who view this differently. And most of them behave responsibly despite anonymity. Those who don't are mere cowards. Mostly I find Gatemouth in that group, though, perhaps, under different circumstances we would have gotten along better. After all, I am not ALWAYS controversial and, I am going out on a limb here, Gatemouth isn't always insulting and speaking on inacurate hunches and criticizing when he really doesn't know his facts.

 So, dude, should we meet in real life, let's talk productively Whether or not I know who you are, I am open to face to face talk even with those I disagree with. That is one reason why I use a screen name that is widely known as corresponding with David Michaelson and I don't shy away from personal information. So people CAN discuss things face to face with me.


Submitted by EnWhySeaWonk on Mon, 05/22/2006 - 11:35am.

Mole333, as I did an entire post on this, I won't go into detail about why I think you are mistaken.

"That is one reason why I use a screen name that is widely known as corresponding with David Michaelson " HA HA HA HA HA. My my you have an inflated opinion of yourself. I had no idea who you were until you wrote that and I've seen your moniker pop-up on various sites sans your real name.

I just did a google search for Mole333 and I didn't see your full name on the first several results which I looked at. Guess what, sir? You've been posting pseudonymously unless you use your name every time. And that makes you a big ol' hypocrite.


Submitted by mole333 (not verified) on Mon, 05/22/2006 - 1:03pm.

EnWhySeaWonk:

 Well, mole333 is widely known. I know that because people have been coming up to me for months knowing full well who I am both online and in person. So you could take my word for that. That includes many who disagree with me. However...

 In most of my profiles my email address is my normal everyday email address. In some profiles I have a picture. And in many posts I use personal info. You are right. Perhaps I have not in any commonly known way am saying who I am in all contextx...and maybe I should. But I will say that "mole" is a nickname that goes back to elemenatary school and is certainly not hiding my identity.

 I did a google search with mole333 and I see you are right. Without some digging I do come of pseudonymously. Point taken. However, on the second page of the search there is:

http://members.virtualtourist.com/m/223c6/ 

So anyone with any real interest could find it easily enough. 

 As to ego, well, sorry if I came off that way. Perhaps Gatemouth doesn't bring out my best. But I don't see why that particular line is so "full of myself." My point was I use the name that is in pretty much all of my email addresses so anyone who ever emails me knows who I am and as far as I am aware I am reachable through my normal email addresses on all sites I post. Mole333 isn't any special identity I use.

 And as to pseudonyms, I do know the arguements. And there are many cases where people use it without using it as an excuse to be abusive without taking the consequences. I just don't think Gatemouth qualifies. I do think he is a bully who hides behind his pseudonym to say whatever he wants without having to face people. Whether or not mole333 is a pseudonym, believe me I get addressed face to face about what I write under that name quite frequently. So it isn't a very good pseudonym.

 And maybe I should have been considerably clearer: I consider those who use a pseudonym as protection against consequences to be cowards. I do not think of those who use a pseudonym but maintain a respectful demeanor to be cowards. They are behaving as if they were face to face with someone.

If I offended anyone OTHER than those who bully from behind a pseudonym, I apologize. 


Submitted by Bouldin (not verified) on Mon, 05/22/2006 - 1:22pm.

Ya know, NYCW, Mole's identity is well known. So is yours. I knew who he was before I ever met him. I see him at least twice a month. So perhaps we might all be a little bit more hesitant to throw invective at one another? Especially over a triviality like online handles?

 Gatemouth, I'll freely admit to being rather less of a fan following the blood libel nonsense. Nonetheless, this is a troubling post. Be well.

:-), M 


Submitted by EnWhySeaWonk on Mon, 05/22/2006 - 1:49pm.

"Ya know, NYCW, Mole's identity is well known. So is yours." Well known? Moi? Maybe...But considering thousands of people read blogs (and tens of thousands read blogs like dailykos, where Mole has posted), how many people reading them know who either of us are? And who of those masses that don't is going to care enough to research who we are (my moniker and my last name do not appear in Google results, so it would be pretty hard)? Thus, essentially, unless Mole links to a bio with his name in it every time he posts, he's being pseudonymous.

As to me, lots of insiders know who I am--but I'm still an unknown, although, hopefully an entertaining unknown, to most non-insiders.

I know for myself that I don't use EnWhySeaWonk to say things I wouldn't normally say. I can't go into my reasons without making it defeat the purpose, but I never say anything I wouldn't say in mixed company on any blogs--hopefully my reasons for being pseudonymous will change, because I'd love to be more open; my "second coming out" post is already written in my head (I even know which picture of myself I'd use in it).


Submitted by mole333 (not verified) on Mon, 05/22/2006 - 2:09pm.

NYCW:

 All points well taken. I guess even on dKos I am well known by insiders who I haven't even met in real life. Easy to forget that those who aren't insiders and who aren't interested enough to do research won't know. My comments to Gatemouth were poorly considered as written.


Submitted by The Anonymater (not verified) on Mon, 05/22/2006 - 6:50pm.
I mean no personal offense to anyone, but there is an awful lot of political blogging all of a sudden, more than anyone can or should read, and you might all do well to slow down the pace a little and put the emphasis on quality not quantity of words or posts.

Submitted by notreallyanonymous (not verified) on Mon, 05/22/2006 - 7:26pm.
zapped!
Submitted by Joe Futuro (not verified) on Tue, 05/23/2006 - 7:17am.
This thread is unreadable. Hope you're not all doing this on taxpayer money like I am.  Oops!
Submitted by Uncle Jasper Scotto (not verified) on Tue, 05/23/2006 - 7:38am.
I wish Gatemouth and Fat Ugly Smelly Toothless Bastard could co-exist but both have done some pretty nasty political crap and so  I don't think it's to be. Also although both have existed on the taxpayers dime at times only one currently is on the dole and that makes the other insane.  So boys try to play nice and since you can't you and this tape will self-destruct in 8 seconds!
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 05/23/2006 - 8:16am.
Jasper: have you never not been on the dole yourself?
Submitted by Black Pride (not verified) on Tue, 05/23/2006 - 9:37am.

After reading all of these comments, I have to say, I'm shocked. Many, many times on this blog and others, I have disagreed with GM, but I have always found him insightful and filled with political history - not only of one neighborhood of Brooklyn, but of the whole city. Why on earth would you guys want to shut him down?

Some bloggers just rattle...the anonymity of the computer gives them free reign to incessently idle about with their conspiracy theories and salacious gossip. GM didn't do that; he backed up the reasons for his statements (which is more than we can say for many bloggers). You may not have agreed with what he said - and I often found myself defending my choice of candidates in my home neighborhood of Bed-Stuy from his wrath - but the mere fact that we came back and engaged him - and ourselves - is a testament to the power of his words, and the popularity and importance of the political blogger.

A good friend of mine once said to me, "If everyone in your organization agrees with you, then your organization is too small."

I say this with all sincerity, I will miss you, GM; things just won't be the same.


Submitted by False Positive (not verified) on Tue, 05/23/2006 - 6:46pm.

      I am the person identified by Gatemouth as the target of FUSTB's misplaced wrath, which, if Uncle Jasper is correct seems almost pathological. The question remains, even if he sincerely believes me to be Gatemouth, why is he bothering me? 

Despite Gatemouth's assertion, I consider myself to be a fairly pleasant individual; true, I may have asked my neighbors to accept a shelter in their nieghborhood, but G-d, it was a shelter for battered woman. But, even if I've been unpleasant to some of my neighbors, I've never been unpleasant to FUSTB. To the contrary, I've been his friend, sympathetic ear and source of information.  Why does he hate me so?  

I've never worked in a campaign against one of FUSTB's clients, although I have worked together with him at times. In fact, though, I've not worked in any political capacity, outside of petition binding, since 2002, except for one day in 2003 helping out a mayoral candiate in Schenectady. While I once spoke against one of FUSTB's clients at a political club, I think I've showed restraint under the circumstances, given that this particular client has proudly boasted in public about refusing to hire me for a job, as if this was a creditial which merited election. 

I'm truly saddened by Uncle Jasper's reports that it drives FUSTB insane that I hold a job in the public sector. It happens that I work in one of the most heart wrenching  jobs government has to offer in order to support my family, looking forward to little but getting home from work and vesting my thirty year pension. Somehow, FUSTB feels this merits him using the web to make comments which can only be interpreted as threats of blackmail; comments he's repeated to me in public.

Please FUSTB, I'm not your enemy, leave me alone!


Submitted by doctor (not verified) on Thu, 05/25/2006 - 9:12am.

Take your pills Gatemouth.  Your paranoid and think everyone acts like your.  Don’t you think if anyone were after you they could have just tip off your bosses.  You live a sad life full of hate.  Life is short control you hate.    


Gatemouth's picture
Submitted by Gatemouth on Fri, 05/26/2006 - 5:10pm.
That there's no dount he's "Stop Yassky" has been called into question. He may not be, but the rest the rest of the comment seems pretty accurate.   

Submitted by brand propecia (not verified) on Thu, 03/22/2007 - 7:48pm.
Submitted by ed pills (not verified) on Tue, 05/15/2007 - 11:10am.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.