A Referendum on Mayoral Control of the Schools“There’s no question that mayoral control has done really positive great things.”----Dan Squadron “We need to get parents back in the process in a real way; we need to empower them. I feel the legislature was mislead by this Mayor…”---State Senator Marty Connor As Mike Bloomberg moves towards creating a Charter Commission to extend his tenure in the Mayor’s Office to lives in being plus 21 years, by expanding the public‘s right to return him to office, he does nothing to allow voters to actually express their opinion on the real issues that impact their lives. Next year, the legislature will vote on the crucial issue of whether to extend the experiment of absolute monarchial Mayoral control over the public school system. And yet, in all the City there is only one opportunity this year for voters to express a clear cut choice on this matter of monumental consequence. As such, it is likely that all eyes will be on the race for State Senate between incumbent Marty Connor and upstart Dan Squadron to gauge whether the much ballyhooed public anger over the manner in which school are run is really of much political consequence. Since, outside of a Park in one corner of the district, virtually nothing separates these candidates on this issues, voters who care about the schools are well advised to cast their votes on the basis of this issue alone. As one can see in this video excerpt of a recent debate between these candidates, the contrast could not be greater. Squadron thinks Mayoral control has made the school system accountable to the public. Connor thinks it has stripped away all accountability. Most parents of public school children in the 25th Senatorial District seem to side with Connor, citing Kindergarteners in Tribeca being bussed to 1st Avenue and 23rd Street; admissions processes for Pre-K designed by Franz Kafka and M.C. Escher. A gifted admissions process designed by Lester Maddox and Orville Faubus. The elimination of politicians, but not politics, from the school variance process, with the Tweed Court house accommodating its favorite out of district kids in schools that can’t accommodate children from their own zones. Parents being fobbed off on “parent coordinators” whose job is to block access to anyone who might actually be able to accomplish anything or answer a question. And no accountability to anyone. Meanwhile Squadron trumpets his service in the Bloomberg educational bureaucracy, and his endorsements from key Bloomberg educrats. Connor acknowledges the new regime’s made some worthy changes “at the edges”, and Squadron acknowledges some changes need to be made, but their underlying attitude is unmistakable. During the debate, Connor was looking to throw out most of the bathwater, while Squadron called for a few cosmetic changes akin to putting lipstick on a mule. Since the debate, Squadron's encountered enough angry parents to now emphasize and expand exponentially the changes he seeks, but the video captures what he really thinks, and the substance of his position remains unchanged. As far as the future, Squadron’s vision is also clear--more of the same, only somehow better. He accuses Connor of wanting to “go back to the bad old days of the Board of Education.” Actually, the video captures Connor saying “I don’t know anyone that wants to go back to the old system.” Since Squadron was sitting right next to Connor at the time, one must once again conclude that Squadron is lying, but that’s like complaining of dogs biting men. Actually Connor is part of the Senate Democrats’ School Governance Task Force and is holding a hearing to get parental input on Mayoral Control so as to better formulate the school governance legislation to be introduced in next year’s session. The hearing is Tuesday, August 12, 5:00-8 PM at Brooklyn Borough Hall. What a novel idea--to listen to parents instead of paternalistically trying to force feed them what you think is good for them. So, when you call your parent coordinator or your principal, they just ignore you? Perhaps they would be more responsive if there were a community school board again. Parents did used to call their CSB representatives with complaints. Of course, others called seeking jobs for themselves and their friends and relatives. Often they were accommodated, especially if they volunteered to help their CSB member get re-elected. I (and many others) reported on this from 1992-6. Empowering people is all well and good, but what they do with their power is often not.
I just got through the process of getting my son into a decent public school in Brownstone Brooklyn. Every parent coordinator gave me the runaround, lies and misinformation about varinaces. Still later, after calling my Councilman, I was spoken to by an administrator in District 1, who told me there were no vainaces at the schools that we were interested in. Later it was revealed that not only did the Tweed Courthouse give out kindergarten variances to PS 261 to non-District 15 kids (we are in District 15), but they gave so many that the school could not even accomodate all of those in zone. If this was the cure, how is it any better than the disease? As a concerned parent, you only oppose mayoral control if you are a political hack with a stake in the old patronage system that put jobs at 110 livingston ahead of education. I have been leaning towards connor, but if this is their only substantive difference, I'll vote for Squadron. What seems clear is that mayoral control as it currently exists is not the answer. Returning to the school boards as they were (some of which were good, by the way) also seems not to be the answer. Kudos to elected officals like Marty Connor who see what's happening and will now stand up and say "it's not working, let's go back to the drawing board."
By all measures, mayoral control needs some serious fixing.
Actually, it is Mole333, Millstone and Jacoby at the Daily Gotham who've been the political bloggers most critical of mayoral control. This piece is mild by comparison
Post new comment |
The "old" Board of Education was visibly broken by corrupt politics, nepotism, patronage, etc. There was a need to clean this up, we all perhaps agree on that. But instead of keeping a democratic process in place with new faces eager to be of service to NYC children, Michael Bloomberg implemented a strategy that removed any voice that wasn't his, or speaking for him. In 2003 Corporation Counsel Michael Cardozo (appointed by Mayor Bloomberg) asked Joseph Rich at the US Department of Justice (where, interestingly, Joel Klein used to work - he took Vincent Foster's office the day after Mr. Foster died) to expedite the removal of NYC residents from the right to vote for the school board (see my article on that at http://www.parentadvocates.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=article&articleID=7337). Then, they - Mayor Bloomberg, Joel Klein, and Michael Cardozo - removed the school board altogether. The "new school board" has all its' members appointed and is not a school board. I attended the NY State School Board Association conference last year, and NYC was not represented by anyone, although the conference attendees' list had the name of Michael Best, General Counsel to the NYC BOE, on it...because he was a speaker!!
We can and must change this terrible situation and get the voice of the people back as part of the policy-making process for the public school system in NYC. I have 4 children, all of whom have and are right now attending public school in NYC, and I have no one to speak to about the education they are not getting.