Summer Suggestions for the MTA

While I’m not much of a beachcomber myself, it seems to me that in the New York area going to the beach isn’t the big deal today that it was in the 1960s when I was a child, let alone in our parents’ generation when just about everyone headed to Coney Island, Orchard Beach or the Rockaways on warm summer weekends. Part of this may be changing tastes, part of it is the decline of on-shore amusements in these areas, but part of it is public relations. Private transit companies were always trying to find ways to entice people to travel during the off-peak hours, weekends and holidays, when there is plenty of capacity and additional customers are pure profit. Many streetcar companies built amusement parks and picnic grounds at the end of the line, to convince city dwellers to go in the opposite direction for an outing. And, until the creation of New York City Transit in 1953, the subway system featured special trains to Coney Island. I suggest that the MTA bring that service, and other special summer services, back.

The Coney Island summer service ran express from 10 a.m. to 10 p.m. every day on what is now the Franklin Avenue Shuttle and the Brighton Express, from Fulton Street in Brooklyn to Stillwell Terminal in Coney Island. On sunny weekend and holiday days, it was extended on the otherwise unused express tracks on the Sea Beach (N train) line into Lower Manhattan at Chambers Street.

With the system, and the city, reconfigured over the past 50 years, I would propose a different service pattern. From 10 am to 3 pm, four “Beach Specials” an hour (one every 15 minutes) could run from Queensboro Plaza on the Astoria (N line) to Manhattan, make local stops on the BMT Broadway line to Canal Street, then travel over the Manhattan Bridge and down to Coney Island as a Sea Beach super-express, bypassing all stops between 59th Street and Coney Island by using the middle track. While traveling to Manhattan during these hours, the trains could run as regular N and Q trains to bring Brooklynites into the city. Between 3 pm and 10 pm, the service pattern would reverse. Trains would run as regular N and Q trains outbound to bring Brooklynites home from Manhattan, but rather than traveling with fewer passengers the other way, they would run as super-express “Beach Train Specials.”

Unless the service were to really take off, it may not even be necessary to run additional trains. Of the six trains per hour running on each line, four running against the prevailing passenger traffic would run in regular service and two as “Beach Train Specials.” This would take advantage of the fact that most people are traveling to Manhattan early in the day, and from Manhattan later on, while travel to Coney Island is the reverse. I’d run the service anytime the temperature was forecast to be over 85 degrees Fahrenheit on a weekday or 80 degrees with no rain on a weekend, from Memorial Day to Labor Day. The uncertainty as to whether the service would be operating would give radio stations, TV stations and newspapers a reason to make announcements when it was. If the service did take off, the Beach Special could become an additional train in each direction, at least during non-rush hours when subway cars and track capacity is available.

Why were beach specials discontinued? Perhaps because they make no practical sense. Whatever time a customer would save by skipping stations, they would lose by having to wait for the “Beach Train Special,” making the tradeoff at best a wash.

However, perhaps because I have now been in the private sector for nearly two years, I’m starting to think of people’s tendency to follow the herd rather than think for themselves as something to be taken advantage of rather than something I could hope to change. I’ll bet that if there were a “Beach Train Special” advertised as such, in flyers distributed in hotels and in eating and drinking establishments patronized by young adults, some tourists and twentysomethings would travel to Coney Island who wouldn’t have thought to have done so otherwise. Some tourists might buy Metrocards who would otherwise have purchased tickets on the double-decker buses. PR and symbolism shouldn’t work that well, but often do.

And while we’re at it, now that it has taken over the route as part of the MTA bus company, could the MTA extend the Q53 “Beach Bus” a little farther to Riis Park during the summer, rather than have it stop at Beach 116th Street? That bus runs express from the Queens subways -- the Flushing Line and the Queens Boulevard Line -- down the Rockaways, but stops short of what ought to be its ultimate destination, requiring a change of bus and a long wait given limited Sunday schedules. A well publicized “Beach Bus” could bring more Western Queens residents, those less likely to have their own cars, to the ocean.

And how about the Q35, which carries riders from the Junction in Flatbush to Riis Park? If, during the summer, that line were extended west to cross more subway and bus lines (Q/F/D/B68), might it attract enough Brooklyn riders to justify service more than once every 30 minutes on a Sunday? Riis Park may be the most underutilized public facility in the city, which is fine for those of us with a car (it’s where I go in the ocean once a year) but not for anyone else.

MetroNorth and the Long Island Railroad both have summer excursions. New York City Transit can as well. This summer why not give operations planning and marketing something more fun to do that the thankless job of planning and publicizing service diversions. You never know. With global warming, it could be a long hot summer.



Submitted by 628 (not verified) on Mon, 04/09/2007 - 8:40pm.
I don't think mass transit lines in general are configured enough for leisure and the weekends, and not just in New York.  I've been in places where you could not catch a bus from a central sity to a suburb in the morning, or from the suburb to the central city in the evening, forget weekends.  Even in the New York area, contrast the PATH service during rush hour as opposed to other times.  I'd settle for adding a few PATH trains on weekends.  

Anyway, I like the Beach Express idea, but it definitely should have fewer stops, only one stop in Queens, four stops in Manhattan (Lexington Ave, Times Sq., Union Sq., and Canal St), and two in Brooklyn (Atlantic Ave and 59th Street) before reaching Coney Island.  People could take locals to the Beach Express stops.  Also, it might make sense to run a boat there in addition or instead.

Submitted by Peter (not verified) on Mon, 04/09/2007 - 9:32pm.
The LIRR is pretty active in marketing its beach specials.  Jones Beach seems to be the most popular one even though getting to the beach requires a shuttle bus ride from Freeport.  I'm surprised that Long Beach isn't more popular, as the beach is within walking distance of the station.
Submitted by Jeff (not verified) on Tue, 04/10/2007 - 8:43am.
It sounds like a great idea. But for those who don't know, there are many beach closings in Coney Island & Brighton Beach right after Memorial Day, especially during the week. The parks Dept. rope off large areas of Beach, that you can't go into the water. It was a fight just to get to the high water mark. This problem has been a recurrent one for the past 8-10 years. My wife was even arrested back in June 2000, for just sitting in her beach chair in a roped off area. Being a member of CB 13, She has fought for keeping the areas open for many years. So what good is having an Beach Express Train if once you get there you are sandbagged by the Parks Dept. If you need to see the article of my wife's arrest go to the back issue of the Bay News June 19 edition,2000. Although our councilman Domenic M. Recchia, Jr.(whose district  the Beaches are in) may want to change the Parks policy on these closings he seems to be impotent in this regard.
Submitted by Larry Littlefield on Tue, 04/10/2007 - 6:21pm.
Remember, the parks budget has been shrinking relative to inflation for years. They don't have enough people to collect the garbage in the parts of Coney Island that are open. And not that the City Council is now promising libraries open six days per week -- in four years, if there is no recession and fiscal crisis in the meantime (odds, near zero).

While overall taxes are higher, note that homeowners and now possibly renters rebates have been given priority over these services. Perhaps the next logical step is to tell people they've gotten their rebate, so now parks and libraries are fee-only.

Submitted by 628 (not verified) on Tue, 04/10/2007 - 7:26pm.
This is off the main topic, but it relates to the library comment.

I passed by my branch library recently, and noticed that its hours were 10 to 6, Monday to Friday, except on one day when it was open 12 to 8.  Its closed on the weekends.

WTF?  Why set up the hours for something like a library so that it is impossible for anyone who is employeed, or in school, to use it?  If there are only funds to keep the place open 40 hours a week, why not close it during two weekdays and in the mornings?  Second, isn't there a pointof diminishing returns in attempting to provide a public service on the cheap?If you really can't keep a library open more than 40 hours a week maybe its time to shut down the system, and save on the overhead. 

Submitted by Larry Littlefield on Tue, 04/10/2007 - 7:59pm.
I agree with all you said, including the diminishing returns.

Moreover, the internet has made libraries in some ways obsolete while also giving them a whole new role. Clearly those who cannot afford their own computer and internet connection could use the help of the community there. Library computers are heavily used.

I can tell you now that my child is in a public high school the public schools now assume internet access. Job openings have moved to the net as well.

Anotherthing: in space scarce cities you give up private amenities, such as big back yards and private pools and a whole library room in your McMansion, for shared amenities like public parks, pools, libraries, beaches, vibrant streets, mass transit. Without those shared amenities, city living has less value.

For all the recent whining about the decline of the middle class, it is in public and publicly financed services -- schools, libraries, parks, until recently transit, health care for non-seniors -- that the non-affluent lose what really matters. These things matter more than whether you have more or less money for things you don't really need and room to put it in.

Submitted by The Yankee (not verified) on Tue, 04/10/2007 - 9:31pm.

I agree with your sentiments, Larry. The city could also do its part and promote the beaches more as part of the tourism package. Additionally, special bus runs could be introduced. For example, unless you live near one of the BMT lines going to Coney Island or by a bus that gets to the area, getting there without a car is a real hassle. Buses such as the B36 could be extended to serve more areas during prime beach season and several bus lines that terminate not that far away from Coney Island could have special runs going there, much like certain buses have rush hour or school day runs taking them beyond their regular route.

It'd take some promotion to let people know that those buses were there, or else they'd run fairly empty. But it could draw some people that would like to go, but the long trip using current mass transit options is prohibitive.

The same reasons that some people forgo the car or a bus-to-subway trip and hop on the express buses in Brooklyn (such as the former Command Bus lines) may entice them to find their way towards Coney Island (or the other beaches in the city). After all, there are a couple of bus lines heading to Jones Beach that operate only when the beach is open, it may make some sense to see if it can be replicated to our beaches.

Of course, I could be completely wrong.


Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.