You Can’t Rely On Anyone in the Aftermath of Generation Greed
From the New York Times: “Harry Nespoli, president of the Uniformed Sanitationmen’s Association, said the problems late Sunday underscored how the city could not rely on outside contractors to help with snow removal and other jobs in such storms, particularly during a holiday weekend. ‘You can never count on the privates, because they don’t have to show up,’ he said. ‘What obligation do they have? The mayor can’t order them out. The commissioner can’t order them out.’” From the New York Post: “Selfish Sanitation Department bosses from the snow-slammed outer boroughs ordered their drivers to snarl the blizzard cleanup to protest budget cuts -- a disastrous move that turned streets into a minefield for emergency-services vehicles, The Post has learned… ‘They sent a message to the rest of the city that these particular labor issues are more important,’ said City Councilman Dan Halloran (R-Queens), who was visited yesterday by a group of guilt-ridden sanitation workers who confessed the shameless plot.’”
Now let’s get one thing clear. There are no Sanitation Department budget cuts. There are no cuts in most agencies, except for the usual suspects like parks, libraries, the Administration for Children’s Services and public higher education. If there was, taxes would be going down, and no one is suggesting that. What is happening is a huge shift of resources from people providing services today (public or private) to debts run up by Generation Greed, and retirement and senior health care that they had promised themselves but chose not to pay for (or, in another factor, cut a deal to retroactively enhance). And this is just getting started. So what are people to expect? I’ve written about this here before. Less and less, you will be able to expect the police to protect you, or the fire department to rescue you, even as you pay more and more in taxes for police and fire. The share of New York City children who receive an actual education had temporarily gone up, but will go way, way down since the NYC teacher pension plan is among the most underfunded in the country – and the retired, the near retired in seniority jobs, and the bondholders have first dibs one whatever money can be extracted from the serfs. Those “at or over 55” will get their hip replacements and take their cruises. Those coming after had best hope for medical marijuana followed by legal assisted suicide. And anyone in charge had better be prepared to do nothing but take blame. Because only insiders will be in charge, and those insiders who want to stay in charge will hardly want to point the finger generally. So people had better be prepared to make do and cooperate. Driving on the streets, getting stuck and blocking whatever plows were out there is not cooperation. Having everyone (or most people) get out and shovel is cooperation. Let’s not forget how much the actions, inactions and attitudes of millions of people – those with the greatest sense of entitlement – contributed to this. As for what to expect from social institutions, things have not really even started to get bad yet – though that may be approaching. If you want to fix this, you’ll end up as frustrated as I have become, because this is not a technical problem. What we have is the legacy of Generation Greed, and Generation Greed is still in charge. We’ve had years of “from each according to their stupidity, to each according to their greed” and as the bills come due and more and more people refuse to pay them, we are heading for an institutional collapse. And what happens in such a collapse? According to a popular, half tongue in cheek presentation on the institutional collapse of the Soviet Union and a purported “collapse gap” that would make the U.S. worse off in similar circumstances, “We definitely should not expect any grand rescue plans, innovative technology programs, or miracles of social cohesion.” Well, people will either have to hang together or they will definitely hang separately. I wouldn’t be making the charges now appearing in the press without one hell of a lot of proof. But if what the press is saying about the response to this storm is an omen, it definitely is not good. As I said, I wouldn't be making that charge without one hell of a lot of evidence. We'll see.
That would be basically a declaration of war against the people of the city (not the Mayor, as they would probably like to claim) by among the best off and most privileged in it, equivalent to the successful blackmail by Wall Street -- bail us out and let us keep our bonuses or we'll destroy the economy and back the other side in elections. We'll see. I can say that what I saw Monday morning at 5th Avenue and 9th Street in Brooklyn -- six to eight plows parked and doing nothing with no plows visible anywhere else -- was consistent with one of two explanations. One is a job action. The second is a bunch of drivers heading over the place in the area with the most businesses open 24 hours to take a break, get something to each and go to the bathroom, and getting stuck behind (in some cases they weren't behind so let's say because of) stalled cars and buses. And that's what was claimed when I asked. It appears that some senior citizens died as a result of the lack of emergency access for whatever reason. I don't believe any public decisionmaker of this generation would wish for that to happen. But a baby also died. That is more consistent with the values of Generation Greed, unless it is your own baby and you haven't moved on to a better family situation. After all, Local 1199 threatened to let our babies die several times over the years. If this is just a rumor, who started it? Harry Nespoli, the head of the Sanitation Worker's union, by stating some time ago that as a result of all the money going to the retired (due to successful union lobbying and dealing) we might not get our snow cleaned up in a storm. I think the lesson for NYC union leaders is that unless total funding for their agency(ies), including payments to the retired, is down from what it was before the recession hit, they'd be better off lying and saying everything is great than telling the truth and telling people they are screwed (even if they don't do it with a smile and end with "we scored and are off to Florida screw you.") Particularly the UFT, whose then-leader described the 25/55 pension enhancement as a "win for children." The other lesson is that the city may have stumbled upon what unions hate the most -- cutting lines and demotions. As I've described, unions love layoffs. You have the same amount of money going to the retired and those in no-work seniority posts, but fewer people actually working. The amount they provide to the people of the city falls twice as fast as the budget -- more than twice as fast if those still on the job use the budget cuts as an excuse to do even less work apiece. And the workers laid off are gone and forgotten, joining the mass of serfs who don't matter. Cut lines and those in seniority posts are theoretically required to do something, and for less money. If there was a job action, it wasn't because of layoffs. Post new comment |
Wrong and dishonest. According to the News Editorial page, not one dime of sacrifice should be expected of those workers already hired, let along those already retired. All the sacrifice, the unions and politicians would surely agree, should be foisted onto future generations and employees.
That will have no effect on how bad off public services are for the foreseeable future. Because there will be no future generations of employees for years. And if the pay and benefits they receive for working (as opposed to retroactively awarded for not working) are low enough, even when you hire them they won't be worth having.
The generation that still reads the Daily News doesn't want to hear what the problem really is.