The Vines (#02-07)

Some impatient people are betting that New York governor Eliot Spitzer will disappoint his many fans, who were so optimistic for his political agenda, after his landslide victory last fall. They are saying that given Spitzer’s rocky start as governor, it is imperative that the democrats control the Senate in two years. They are saying that Joe Bruno and Sheldon Silver may batter Spitzer into submission unless he pulls this off. They are also saying that the powers behind the leaders of the Senate and Assembly are so entrenched that Eliot has bitten off more than he could chew. They are suggesting that he change his approach since most of the members of the two legislative bodies are spineless. I hope like hell that he continues the good fight for political reform and the like. I hope like hell that he stands strong, stands his ground and stays the course.

Something I wrote in my last column has gotten me some choice phone calls since, and appears to have angered a few; c’est la vie. I wrote something to this effect: as a collective (not individually), black elected officials in New York should be called “New York’s dumbest”. Whoop-dee-damn–doo. I went on to further amplify my reasoning within the column and later in the thread of said blog. If you want to, you can apply the same reasoning (and sobriquet) to the collective members of both legislative houses in Albany. Sure there are many bright and successful individuals there, but collectively, both houses have been dysfunctional for years; as such, one can make a collective judgment. I am not afraid to make that call.

Another thing that seems to have gotten me in hot water is my early morning response to a comment on the thread of said column; the issue was: homosexuality. Now, I guess I will have to tackle something I have been warned to stay away from; something that I have been avoiding: a column on gay marriage/ gay issues. Given the current debate in Albany, maybe the time is right. Or maybe I have been suckered in by those who over the years seem to resent my positions and harbor fears that I may be homophobic. No matter how much I state that I am not, there will always be gays on these blogs, who see me as an enemy (I guess). Geeze; there is so much to write about, but so little time to do it/lol.

Back to the governor (Spitzer); okay, so he has dropped a few rounds, but this is a title fight kids; and title fights go fifteen. Buckle in now; don’t do like New Jersey governor John Corzine, otherwise you will be battered, bruised and bloodied: the best is yet to come. Reactionaries will always push back against political reform; so too will all those special interest types. Eliot is finding out what Tom Suozzi knew all along: reform will only come with a big fight.

Dem. State Senate leader Malcolm Smith (Queens) sure looked bad with his recent flip-flop, didn’t he? He surrendered ground to Joe Bruno (of all people), in the area of credibility. I am sure that after a decade with no wage increase, the average person will expect that a raise is due for both judges and elected officials. It is obvious that there was a “failure to communicate” between Spitzer and Smith, which has made this all look worse than it probably is really. Smith came off looking like he is Spitzer’s puppet on a string. One militant black activist said: “Malcolm is back on the plantation”. OUCH!!!

It is easy to sympathize with Smith’s situation since he is caught up in an area of divided loyalties (Spitzer-Patterson vs. Dem. State Senators). When he made his grand statement in January (that a person’s word should matter in Albany), many of us said: right on Malcolm. He is carrying a high-powered first name, and I could only hope he lives up to the expectations of it. Catching Spitzer’s back- in the fight for reform- is the right thing; but being castrated in front of 21 million people is another. This should be an interesting year in Albany folks.

Speaking of the state senate, Tony Herbert is intent on unseating Senator Velmanette Montgomery (Brooklyn/18th district). Tony is quite pumped up for his challenge next year folks. He has a lot of ambitious plans on the drawing board and is speaking like a man possessed. For those of us looking for new blood in Albany, it might be worthwhile to take another look at Herbert’s campaign. At this stage, I am sure he could use a helping hand; also, some cash from the other hand too. I want to believe that Herbert knows that this is an uphill struggle all the way; in the past, I thought he sounded like someone who felt that winning was a stroll through the park. I want to believe that he now knows that unseating these incumbents is a ninety-eight per cent, non-winning proposition. But then, as a chairman of IBM once said: if you ever want to succeed eventually, then you have to increase your failure rate.

I interviewed Herbert recently, finding him to be very concerned with the problems facing the youths in this district. He seemed quite concerned about their employability and viability in this changing economy. He thinks that compared to youngsters overseas (with whom they will be competing), black young men here are ill-prepared for the challenges of a changing global economy. He has many ideas for turning around the public-education conundrum. Amongst the many issues we discussed, Tony seems focused on youth-development and economic-development more so than on other issues. He said he will put out a platform of his positions on most issues soon. We also talked about health and housing issues facing those in this district; he offered tangible ideas/ solutions. He is a rather energetic young man. I wish him well. If you believe that it’s time for change in Brooklyn, then give Tony some help. This is not an endorsement; let’s see how his campaign goes first before that decision is made.

Behind all of NYC councilmember Charles Barron’s political maneuvers lately, are some hard decisions that must be made soon. Charles- who will be term limited in 2 years- is looking at all of his options, before deciding where to run next. Presently, he is leaning toward running for Brooklyn’s borough presidency; however, many of his supporters are now suggesting that he run for Diane Gordon’s assembly seat, which they anticipate will be opening up, after her September court date. Some of Barron’s advisors are also telling him not to rule out a rematch with Ed Towns (congress) next year; and/or, to win the assembly seat, then tackle the Public Advocate race in 2009. Barron says that he would rather stay in the city than go to Washington or Albany, but he is keeping an open mind to all his options. He hopes to make a final decision within the next few months as to where he runs next. One thing he is certainly not doing in 2009 is: running for mayor. Did I just hear Billy Thompson heave a sigh of relief?

What many of Barron’s detractors want to doubt is his incredible popularity within certain segments of the black and Hispanic communities; no matter how much I tell them this, they seem to stay in denial. Remember last year when I predicted that he would give Ed Towns a run for his money in the congressional (10th) race? Some people thought that I was smoking crack after I made that prediction. In the end, Barron got 38% of the vote in a three way race, after spending less than $150,000. Towns spent over one million dollars folks. Do the math.

Paul Washington, the former chief of staff of the councilman (Barron) has been posturing like a runner lately. Paul, who wants to follow his old boss in representing the 42nd council district, is looking for a warm-up race. Don’t be surprised if you see him show up running somewhere next year; he needs to. It is known that Barron has been actively recruiting runners for upcoming races in the city; he claims that he wants to build a black-led progressive movement citywide. Charles may have a problem on his hands soon enough though, since one of his protégés Gerry Hopkins, is considering (I am told) a run at assemblyman Camara (43rdAD). Barron and Camara are tight as political buddies, so Charles may have to sit that one out. While we are in the 43rd district, let me advise my friend Geoffrey Davis that the time for running for public office has passed him by, for the moment (and probably for good). Geoffrey needs to focus on building his brother’s beautiful legacy of “Stop the Violence”. I first marched with James and Geoffrey and others, eleven years ago or so; time has sure flown. Geoffrey is a very likeable kid, but he has made a few mistakes along the way which will continue to haunt him if he ever tries to run again.

A lot of what happens politically in East New York hinges on the outcome of Diane Gordon’s corruption trial in September; many folks are holding their cards close to their vest here. It is said that Winchester Keyes, Earl Williams (district leader), Andre Mitchell, Keith Kinch, Carlos Bristol, Mr. Bradley (Gordon’s chief of staff), Mr. Muhammad, Albert Scott and Kenneth Evans, are among the many looking to run, once the seat opens up. If such an event takes place and Charles Barron decides to step in, then the field will clear I am sure. Talking about Earl Williams, he was recently dethroned from chairing the community board- a position he had held since Methuzaler was a baby. It is said that he and Diane Gordon (female district leader/ assemblywoman) aren’t as chummy chummy as they were before.

Do you ever notice that there are very few primaries in the white areas of Brooklyn anymore? Do you ever wonder why? Could white electeds be doing such a good job that no one challenges them? What do you think? Tell Cousin Rocky, okay.

Speaking of white politicians; word is that David Yassky will not run for Boro Prez, but will run for District Attorney instead. I am being told that Afro-American/Caribbean (adopted) state senator John Sampson, is also running in that race. I don’t know if Paul Wooten is still going; given the Mathieu Eugene fiasco, I have my doubts. Meanwhile, the incumbent DA Joe Hynes has been publicly visible in this term. One local reporter confided that he has a different message for each of the different ethnic, racial, religious and nationalistic group that he appears in front of. That person ought to know; that person covers these things for a newspaper.

Staying with white pols; am I the only one anticipating a problem for Lew Fidler soon? Biggie Lew (oops, let me take that back/lol); NYC councilmember Fidler may find that two of his favorite fellow council members (Charles Barron and Bill DiBlasio) are running for Boro Prez. Given the “love” Lew has for this duo, I am predicting that Lew will either support Carl Krueger (if he goes), or run himself–if his health permits. I know Lew keeps insisting that he won’t run for Boro Prez, but did you read his angry response earlier this week, to an anonymous commenter, on the thread of my last blog piece on Room8? The piece is partially titled: “One insurgent and three elected officials in Brooklyn” / (www.r8ny.com).

The response made me think long and hard. Lew raised the issue of term limits again; so, my thinking is that Lew and others in the council, have not given up their fight to have term limits extended to 12 years. Am I right Lew? I have felt all along that NYC Council Speaker Christine Quinn promised to extend term limits as a bargaining chip in her speakership fight with Bill DiBlasio. She now lacks the balls to do it, especially since the voters have spoken on this issue twice, and also since her political-loverboy Mayor Bloomberg refuses to go along. The answer Ms. Quinn, lies in letting the mayor put it up for referendum (again), in an off year like this year 2007. You guys may get lucky; but I doubt it.

Over the years, in conversations with a few council member and staffers, I have ascertained that a vast majority of the council’s members want term limits extended. I feel that rigor-mortis hasn’t set in for this issue as yet. Expect that before this term expires in 2009, this issue will be back on the front burner. Surprisingly enough-for those who knew how active I was, in working hard twice to beat back beating back this thing- I feel that they should get another referendum. You see, it is generally accepted, that after three strikes, you are out; gone; finished; done. Otherwise, we the people will always have this friggin threat over our heads here in this city. New council members will again want to overturn term-limits by legislation in a future go-around. Wait; you will see.

Barack Obama’s presidential campaign is quietly going deep folks. If Al Gore doesn’t get into this race before Labor Day, I am predicting that Obama will have a ton load of delegates come convention time; more than any non-white in the history of the presidential politics. The Obama campaign has been quietly spreading across the country in a semi-clandestine way. There is an underground network of supporters who are working hard to spread the word so to speak. They are doing well. Cousin Rocky knows what he is talking about here folks; I have some inside info. If Hilary Clinton doesn’t hit this guy soon (and real hard), then she will have a big problem next February. Don’t be surprised if the “race” card is played against Obama. Don’t be surprised if you see more questions popping up about whether or not this country is ready to elect a non-white male; especially one mulatto who claims that he is “black”. Don’t be surprised if you see direct negative appeals to base racial instincts. This tepid race is going to heat up real soon folks. Keep your eyes on the polls: Obama’s numbers will continue to rise in the short term. Don’t say Cousin Rocky didn’t tell you. But then: what do I know, huh?

The more I think of the presidential race, the more I like the sound of that Gore- Obama ticket, that’s been making its way up the internet charts. If Gore heads the ticket, it will be a potent one. Some skeptics are predicting a Howard Dean–like meltdown for Obama; I doubt it. He is smooth this guy; real smooth. And he oozes charm. We all know that charisma is a big draw in national politics. I am yet to finish the last of my three part series on Obama; will get to it eventually.

Speaking of the first presidential debate amongst democrats; didn’t you enjoy former Alaskan senator Mike Gravel as he tried so hard to be Denis Kucinich? Fact is: he succeeded. And Joe Biden is a trip isn’t he? Joe is definitely one of the more cerebral members of Congress, but brevity isn’t his strong suit. I don’t see a Hispanic “thing” happening for Bill Richardson; do you? Barack and Hilary both held their own, in a debate with no pronounced winner (in my estimation); and John Edwards was as usual: calm, cool and smooth. If Edwards wasn’t such a successful high-priced lawyer, I think he would have been doing even better in the polls. Trust me when I say those four hundred dollar haircuts will hurt him badly come next year. In fact: they have already started to hurt him; he just doesn’t know it yet. As good as the chances look for Dems-in their hopes of recapturing the White house next year- this race isn’t a lock at all. It all hinges on who the candidates are from both parties. Don’t kid yourself because we live in New York; this is hardly a wrap for the democrats: it’s a long way to Tipperary.

Well, I know many of you are thinking that we have heard the last of the 40th council district race; you are wrong. It is never over “until the fat lady sings”, and right now the fat lady isn’t even in the building. It seems as though both Harry Schiffman and Wellington Sharpe are considering another crack at Mathieu Eugene, given that petitions start circulating exactly five weeks from today, for the democratic primary in September. From the first race in February to the second in April, Schiffman’s numbers went up over 100 percent; Sharpe’s votes increased by about 33 percent, and Eugene only got about a 10 percent bump. Of these two potential challengers, Schiffman seems to be at a big demographic disadvantage (less than 15% white/Jewish voters), leaving many to feel that he has maxed out, since he was the only candidate to mail to the voters last time out (twice). Sharpe on the other hand has to convince voters that he is a better fit in the city council than Eugene. A challenging task that is doable.

Also considering the race in September are Zenobia McNally and Leithland Tulloch (I am told), from those who ran in either February and/ or April. People are suggesting that Jennifer James is not returning for the September go-around, and that her run was a one-shot-deal. I am sure that we will all know soon enough. Some people have approached me again about a “draft”, and again I refused to be drafted. I have no interest in this race whatsoever- at this time. Let me be unequivocal here: if I am elected, I will not serve. I hope that puts an end to all the “Rock07” speculation. I wouldn’t be surprised if a newcomer joins the field for the upcoming race though; especially now that I am officially out (just kidding/lol).

One thing I feel confident about in my analysis is that Eugene will win again, if there is another crowd of challengers. However, if there are only one or two challengers, I do feel that he can be taken out. If some of those who ran against him coalesce behind one challenger, Eugene will have a rough road no matter how much 1199 or the Clarkes carry his jock. He is that weak. It would be worse for Eugene if another Haitian-American enters the race. Word on the street is that Ferdinand Zizi (who received the consensus nod from Haitian-American activists, over Eugene) received many death threats, and that was the reason why he abandoned his campaign of last February. If this is true, it should be investigated by district attorney Charles Hynes. Haitian-American glamour girl Gina Marie Faustin told me that she has an apartment in the district, and that she is still looking at possibly running in September.

My friend Patrick Gaspard (1199), the various elected officials who endorsed Eugene, and the Clarkes (Yvette and Una), cannot with straight face (and looking people in the eye), tell us that he was the best candidate they could find to represent this district; if they do, then such a statement will eventually become a classic in mendacity. The Clarkes initially claimed that they would interview aspirants and come up with the best qualified person to represent this district; in case you don’t know: there are over one hundred and fifty thousand residents in the 40th council district. Eugene was living outside the district at that point. I rest my case.

The young attorney Terry Hinds called in after my last article, to say that he has made no decisions as to what race he will be running for next. Hinds- who comes from a winning political family- said that I was correct in my report that many people have been pushing him into a run. He seemed to allude that his young wife is the brain behind the operation, and that he has to sit her down and get her input/decision. Peeps, behind every great man there is a greater woman. Remember Cousin Rocky told you this. Hinds said to expect a public announcement by the end of summer or fall. Recent calls to yours truly (from people who want to remain nameless and faceless) suggest that many want Hinds to tackle Nick Perry. Interesting! Nick isn’t easy folks. If Hinds goes at Nick, it will get bloody. It may even end up in the muddy pig sty. Is Terry strong enough for this? Is he ready for this? What do you people think in out-there-land?

My last article brought many phone calls my way; this made me consider doing an article about the story behind Kevin Parker’s initial win in 2002, since it relates to that article in many ways. Now, there is a story longing to be told. If I find the time soon then you guys could expect some fireworks after it is done.

Also, many people have been calling up asking if I am running for office soon, well; let me put it this way: the only thing I am running soon is my big mouth, and my typing fingers. If I decide to do congress next year, I will surely let you all know in time. Right now I would say my chances of doing that is about 20-80 against. Running for public office isn’t something I find ‘sexy’ any more. Plus, my daughter makes my political calls now and she said forget 2008. I know I can always over rule her with my presidential veto, but is it worth it?

In quiet pockets of the 11th Congressional district, some folks who supported Yvette Clarke last year and also in 2004, are quite disappointed about the Mathieu Eugene fiasco. They are now saying that Chris Owens should challenge her next time around. They are talking about “credibility” and “integrity”. Do not let Eugene’s two thousand votes fool you; the Clarkes are at their nadir in this district nowadays. If the Clarke’s support, plus 1199, plus other unions and other elected officials who endorsed Eugene, plus the Haitian-American energy (given the historic nature of his victory), could only garner this low number of votes in a three way race, then the future isn’t as rosy as some wants you to believe. When Una went to work for the republican governor George Pataki, her star started losing luster in the Caribbean-American community; Yvette’s umbilical attachment to her mother will eventually be her downfall. We shall see.

Here is a question for you people in out-there-land; is Junior Boyland still intent on running for city comptroller? And while you are checking that out for me, can you tell me if Tracey Boyland is coming back to challenge Darlene Mealy in two years? I know that there is a reverend in the district who is intent on challenging Junior next year, for the assembly seat that his daddy handed down to him. This person will remain nameless for now, but he is for real. I know some of the operatives with whom he has been speaking. And speaking of the comptroller race; it is said that assemblyman Jim Brennan from the 44th AD will be running. It is also said that if he were to win, then Harry Schiffman and Lori Knipel are in good positions to make runs at that vacancy.

Rumors are that state senator Kevin Parker stopped Jennifer James from supporting Wellington Sharpe in the last week’s race for the 40th council district (special election). It is alleged that Parker explained to her that that empowering Sharpe will be akin to empowering Kendall Stewart (one of Sharpe’s key supporters). Now remember that Stewart is threatening to run against Parker next year folks. There could be truth to this, no?

While still on that race (40th), people are asking if Frances Purcell will now re-emerge to challenge Mathieu Eugene in September. Purcell once ran a strong second to Yvette Clarke, in a seven candidate field (2001). She beat Wellington Sharpe in that race, but has been out of the political loop lately. The last time she ran for public office was in 2002. That year she garnered an incredible 25% of the vote in a special election held to replace Marty Markowitz (senate # 20). Carl Andrews won that race, running on the democratic line. Purcell ran on the Republican line, which is as dead as a doorknob in this district. I want to believe that Purcell is one candidate that Sharpe will step out of the race for.

Stay tuned-in folks.



Submitted by Prodigy (not verified) on Thu, 05/03/2007 - 1:19am.

Considering the possible Perry v. Hinds. I don't think Hinds should tackle Perry at the onset. He is still wet behind the ears. Yes, he ran last year for district leader and came in second and yes, he was instrumental in the court between Eugene and Sharpe. That's well and it provides Hinds with good experience. But I don't think he is ready. Perry is very sneaky, but he isn't stupid. Perry has allies. And he has been in office for quite some time. We understand that it takes alot to unseat an encumbent.

However on another note, Hinds has familiar allies of his own. And they are strong. And who knows, Stewart might endorse Hinds over Perry. But really and truly, I think he should at least run again for district leader and then in 2009 run for Perry's seat. Once Perry decides to run for BP.

In relation to Parker talking to Jennifer James about not endorsing Sharpe, because it is a vote for Stewart is somewhat true. While Sharpe was running for the 1st special elections, and Stewart was working with him, he told voters that "if they voted for Sharpe, they voted for Stewart." I was told he also gave money to various people, trying to buy their vote or giving them means to get the word out. So that is something to consider. And Parker initially presented swicharoo between him and Stewart, but Stewart wasn't hearing that. And apparently, that got Parker upset. And now he is gearing up for the race of his life. So we will see.

 

 

 

 


Submitted by Hack N. Sack on Thu, 05/03/2007 - 7:13am.
 

Rock, as I recall, you previously evaluated this race on “The Politicker” and called Tony “Dead Man Walking”.

 

 Let’s face facts.

In 2002, Tony ran the Senate Minority's black roadshow on reapportionment, going around the state preaching to black audiences about the evils of the racist Republican plan for Senate redistricting.

 

In 2003, Tony became a Republican, all full of himself about compassionate conservatism and supply side economics. I saw him in 2006, chatting with Brooklyn Conservative Boss Jerry Kassar, boasting about all he'd done for John Faso.

Now he says he's a Democrat again?

Is there anything Tony Herbert believes in beyond Tony Herbert? Eric Engquist has documented how Tish James helped him get a job with the Senate Minority by making calls on his behalf. And how he manifested his gratitude for such efforts. It’s one thing to eat at the King’s table, but for Tony Herbert life in politics seems to be an endless series of eclectic buffets.    

At least Eric Adams, who basically did the same double-party switcheroo, had a track record on something outside of selling Eric Adams.

As to Velmanette, even those of us who are sick and tired of “Develop Don’t Destroy Brooklyn’s (DDDB) one-issue politics distorting our local political landscape are also tired of watching Bruce Ratner trying to create its  funhouse-mirror reflection. First Tracy Boyland, now this.  Well at least Tracy had a record.

Velmanette Montgomery is well meaning, but this ultimately comes down to sending a message and this benefits Montgomery. The message is, whatever one thinks of Atlantic Yards, defeating the anti-Yards incumbent in the projects home district would be counterproductive to accomplishing the goal of ensuring proper community consultation and input on future projects, facilitating more efforts to buy everyone in sight and use cash to scare away all political opposition. Further, outsiders with a vested interest in a specific project should not be encouraged in their efforts to game the political process. 

  Rock, don't believe the hype. Tony Herbert could well be your next Jeannine Pirro. LOL! 


Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 05/03/2007 - 8:42am.

Boy Rocky, you were suckered big time.

You begin by outlining the imporatnce of the Democrats taking the State Senate, and then you fall for the Senate Republican's scam.

The Senate Republican majority is doomed in the long-term unless they find a way to corral some non-Republicans into voting with them to organize. This has now been their long-range strategy for many years. They find "Democrats In Name Only" and run them in prhibitively Democartic districts, so they can hold them in reserve in case the Dems ever take the majority.

Example #1: Get Pedro Espada to change parties while maintaining his Democratic enrollment so he can still run in the Democratic Primary.

Example #2: Run Noach Dear in the Democratic Primary against divided black opposition (with the help of some of Rock's relatives).

Example #3: Run Stve Kaufman in the Democratic Primary against Jeff Klein, while also attempting to run him as a Republcian, Cionservattive and Independence.

Example #4 : Carl Kruger; already bought and paid for.

Example # 5: Tony Herbert.     

Rock, get with the program, man! Tony Herbert is Joe Bruno's shill.


Submitted by Yoda on Thu, 05/03/2007 - 10:35am.
Didn't Ferdinand Zizi abandon his campaign because the Board of Elections threw him off the ballot?
Submitted by Anon (not verified) on Thu, 05/03/2007 - 2:15pm.

 

Hackshaw your blogs are all the same revised stories. Blah, Blah, Blah.......................


Submitted by Anon (not verified) on Thu, 05/03/2007 - 2:24pm.

 

I find it interesting that Tony Herbert wants to champion youth issues while he has totally abandoned his beautiful daughter. Herbert has no chance in hell in beating a fly for office.


Submitted by Brooklyn Baron (not verified) on Thu, 05/03/2007 - 3:34pm.
Frances Purcell in the 40th is the best alternative I've heard since the first Special Election this year!! 
Rock Hackshaw's picture
Submitted by Rock Hackshaw on Thu, 05/03/2007 - 6:21pm.
To 2;15 p.m.---------- If my blogs are all the same, blah.... blah..... blah...... then why the hell are you reading them over and over? Point is: I don't need you to validate what I write. The mere fact that you keep reading it-even while you feel this way- tells me that you are a fool.

Submitted by Larry Littlefield on Thu, 05/03/2007 - 6:59pm.
(Do you ever notice that there are very few primaries in the white areas of Brooklyn anymore? Do you ever wonder why? Could white electeds be doing such a good job that no one challenges them? What do you think?)

Among ordinary folks, no one is willing to give notice they are leaving their job (which is what running for office is) to run a race they are almost certain to lose. So they just hope the local pol will do a better job for them. Among political types, they know enough to just wait for an open seat, rather than commit the "crime" of running against an incumbent or designated successor.

The question is, how do you get elections over there? You've got something we could use.

Submitted by Advocate (not verified) on Fri, 05/04/2007 - 12:51am.

Cousin Rocky, I greatly appreciate your insider's view of Central Brooklyn politics.  But, even as an outsider, I recognize that some local elected officials are sleezy and some are people of integrity and principle.

Senator Montgomery may have been in office for a long time and has little to show for it, but please consider that she is in the minority party.  I know of no Democratic Senators who have much to show for their years in office.  That doesn't mean that they are not good people, or, given the likelihood of a Democratic majority within the forseeable future, can begin to shine.

Such an individual, I believe, is Senator Montgomery. 

I'm surprised that you would even consider replacing her just as she's at the cusp of showing us what she can accomplish as a senor member of the majority party. Why would you want to do that?


Rock Hackshaw's picture
Submitted by Rock Hackshaw on Fri, 05/04/2007 - 7:35am.
I think the fact that she (State Senator Velmanette Montgomery) is being challenged, is NEWS in itself; especially given that she has had one primary in a decade. I distinctly and deliberately said that I am not endorsing Tony Herbert. I said "let's wait and see how his campaign unfolds, etc". Does it mean that I will not endorse him: no sireee. Does it mean that I will endorse him: I never said so. I don't know either way; it is still way too early. It will come down to the campaign that he runs; his positions on the issues; etcetra, etcetra. I refuse to rule out his candidacy because of some of the past mistakes that some others may percieve he made. He is still relatively young relative to politics; he is allowed some mistakes isn't he? That is (of course), if he made them; I really don't know him that well enough to make those judgements as yet. Of course his character is an issue; and I am sure the incumbent will go to great lengths to highlight any such defects or issues, if there are any (and I say this because I don't know him that well on a personal level). I still think that once an insurgent reaches out to me after I wrote about his candidacy on my blog, the responsible (and fair) thing was for me to reach back and report on what occurred. Tony still has to make the case for his electability; not me. I do think that insurgent challenges aren't covered enough by meinstream media. I will do my best on the blogs to highlight challenges to incumbents wherever I see them as credibile and viable; or even in protest to the status-quo. I refuse to accept the status quo; after years and years of same old, same old. I want reform; I want change. I will look under any rock for such (no pun intended/lol). If this means that I will highlight a candidate like Herbert: so be it. I must admit that the sharp comments here startled me a bit; I am wondering what you guys read into my article. Tony Herbert didn't even take up 10% of the article. GEEZE. BTW: I don't see REPUBLICANS as ENEMIES. I think this is the damn problem with some of us who are democrats: we tend to villainize opponents (no different to some republicans I must admit).

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 05/04/2007 - 1:42pm.

 

Hackshaw you are an abd for lowering the discourse on this blog. One must always keep a close eye on the enemy. You are the enemy of black elected officials who work hard every day but since you failed to join in their ranks you want to yell and shout like you are some kind of hero. But you are really an abd, gable and a coon.


Submitted by rwallnerny on Fri, 05/04/2007 - 3:23pm.

I hope Obama can pull this off, but the fact is (and the polls indicate) that the party's nominee next year is still very likely to be Hillary Clinton.   Delegate gathering and conventioneering is a game and the best pros at it are in her camp.  Also like it or not, the Clintons are royalty in the Democratic party, and it is going to be very difficult for rank and file party members to go against them in the end (I say "them" because we are already seeing signs that the "two for the price of one" card-- elect Hillary and you get Bill as unofficial foreign policy czar and roving ambassador as part of the deal-- is being played.  Bill and Hillary going door to door in Iowa and New Hampshire next year saying "vote for us" will have a strong effect.  Many democratic party regulars will not have the heart to vote against them, because they have an emotional attachment to them. 

Also very important, neither Barack Obama nor John Edwards have much foreign policy experience of any kind. Hillary gets flamed by democratic activists over her Iraq vote, but the fact remains if the debate next fall is centered on foreign policy and not domestic, she's the one who is going to be the most qualified and prepared to be leading the discussion in that arena and voters are going to realize it.  This is what happened four years ago.  Dean made a great case on domestic policy, but voters in Iowa said if foreign policy and the war are going to be front and center in the general, we better nominate someone who has the experience to be credible in that area.  That was John Kerry.  My guess is that if the primary voters this time think the war isn't going to flare up and that the discussion in the general is going to be mainly domestic issues, that they'll consider Obama and Edwards.  But if they think the central debate in the general is going to be foreign policy, they are going to say "its safer to go with Hillary and Bill who are on a first name basis with all these world leaders than go with these other guys who are all going to need training"  Just like four years ago they decided Howard Dean hadn't gotten his feet wet in foreign policy, whereas John Kerry obviously had, and that made the difference, it could well decide things again. 

Hillary has done a very smart thing I think in not apologizing for her Iraq vote.  I didn't agree with her vote of course, but by not apologizing for it, the republicans in the general won't be as easily able to paint her as some culturally out of touch peacenik who would be weak on military issues.  Which is exactly what they'd do with Obama, who has no foreign policy record to counter the charge, and with Edwards who apologized for his vote. 

I'm excited about the Obama campaign, I really am, but I can't help thinking that primary voters are going to decide in the end that Hillary will make the most experienced, and therefore most practical, general election candidate. 


Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 05/04/2007 - 4:03pm.

 

Why do you people think that because Hackshaw writes these looooooong blogs that the reply's must also be looooooong?


Rock Hackshaw's picture
Submitted by Rock Hackshaw on Fri, 05/04/2007 - 7:01pm.
To 1:42 pm: You are tragic; really. You want to know why I say this? Simple; you keep coming on here and calling me all kinds of names (like "coon", etc.) with your sorry "ANONYMOUS" and cowardly self, but you fail to address my central premise. You do this over and over like a fucking broken phonograph record. All I am saying is this: that given the issues facing the black community, black electeds as a collective, have failed miserably in getting and/or motivating the adequate governmental and citzenry responses needed to address them. THAT'S ALL. Now, what in this can't you understand. I say that because you never attack my writings,and you never quote anything I have written that you dispute; but you plug on away attacking me like no end. ENOUGH ALREADY. Attacking me doesn't change what's happening in BLACK-USA. I am starting to wonder if you are not one of the miserable failures yourself in this regard. Why don't you put a name to these attacks. BE BRAVE.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 05/04/2007 - 7:50pm.

Rock,

 

I don't understand the logic behind your reasoning about homophobia.  You devote so little of your blog to the idea of your sexuality, yet you claim that you are not affected by what people say.  I think gay people shouldn't have to hide behind such hate.  Especially with the Speaker being who she is, people like Rock should be ok with who they are!!  What year do we live in where it is such a crime to be a gay black man?!?!

 

Wake up you haters and leave Rock alone

 

 


Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 05/04/2007 - 9:48pm.

http://www.nyccfb.info/public_disclosure/FA_pdf/FA-2003-aherbert-738.pdf

 


Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sat, 05/05/2007 - 12:41pm.
There will be a tremendous backlash from the PEOPLE of NYC if the City Council tries to extend term limits to 12 years. Those City Council members who have done a good job ,( and only a few have) will have no problem getting another job with the lobbyists connections they have made over their 8 year term. The other bad apples will have to fade out into the sunset. By the way what ever happened to Mr. Miller?  Councilman Domenic M. Recchia Jr. supported him , maybe after term limits ,Mr. Recchia will have a chance  to join his consulting firm.
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sat, 05/05/2007 - 1:01pm.

Rock for now, the election in the 40th is over. 

 Eugene is winner -- whether some of us like it or not. Let us  move on to the next subject...please.  Like which of the  johnny come lately will start doing more than running for an election each time with no record of doing anything, anywhere.  Give us some beef!


Submitted by Zane Off (not verified) on Sat, 05/05/2007 - 5:07pm.
I'd a-leave Dom Recchia alone already. Your stretch to find a reason to negatively comment on such a well liked guy in columns that have nothing to do with him are reaching Dawson-esque proportions. Fier not.
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sat, 05/05/2007 - 10:02pm.

 

Hackshaw your blog is a broken phonograph record. To suggest that collectively black electeds are not up to par with their counterparts is simply foolish. You claim that you like to deal with facts. Well here is a fact: the most POWERFUL elected official in this city is a BLACK MAN  by the name of CONGRESSMAN CHARLES RANGEL. So get your facts right you coon.


Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sun, 05/06/2007 - 7:51am.

Dom Recchia is a fake and phoney and used a racist game plan against a growing Russian Immigrant community

He first won his council seat in a 5 way split when he was the only non jewish candidate.  That same year he almost lost to a republican in a district which has not seen a republican since the Lincoln administration.

Before the next election Recchia had his firends on the redistricting commission cut over 30% of the Russian vote out of his council district.  Even after that fix he made a deal with Norman and Jeff Feldman to knock Tony Eisenberg off the ballot when he tired to run against Recchia when the councilman ran for reelection.   If you look at the CFB records you will see how the councilman used goverment money to break the election law.

Recchia returned the favor to Norman the convicted former county leader when he appeared in a rally for Clarance at Boro Hall to protest Hynes inditement of Norman.

If you look how Reccha personal worth has increased since he has been in office you can understand why he want to remain in office by running for boro president or congress.  If you want Dominic to get richer by using his government position to help developers and his law practice then vote for the bum.

 

 


Rock Hackshaw's picture
Submitted by Rock Hackshaw on Sun, 05/06/2007 - 10:14am.
Tell us something we don't know? So Charlie Rangel heads up "Ways and Means"; so what? . You keep calling me names, but you are still refusing to address my central premise, relative to the objective conditions of the black community. CR being powerful has made no difference to the objective overall conditions of the black comunity; and you know it. He talks about tax policy for rich white folks, while we are talking about basic opportunities for poor black folks. Big difference. The problem with many of us (like you apparently), is that too often we settle for symbolisms. There is real pain on the ground floor, but you are admiring a black man gleefully being showcased on the roof top of the white boys penthouse. GET FRIGGIN REAL. Joblessness is still around 50 %, as it has been with for years amongst black men; about 10% of all black men are in prison or caught up in the legal quagmire; homelessness is going up even higher; health, housing and education issues at are still pervasive. I need not go on with the list of maladies and afflictions. As I have said before: calling me names don't change what is going on the black community. But throw your epithets my way; I am quite CLEAR in what I am saying; on the blogs, I have left a body of my writings and threads for posterity, anyone can see what I have been trying to say; maybe you are too friggin dumb to get the point.

Rock Hackshaw's picture
Submitted by Rock Hackshaw on Sun, 05/06/2007 - 10:20am.
I really don't feel that "STUPIDITY" should be a passport for those making inane anonymous comments on the blogs; stupidity should hold no currency here; especially when some of you who seem to be obsessed with attacking me with all types of epithets, can't even understand what you are reading in very basic ways even. It's better to stay silent and be thought of as a fool, than to write something stupid and silly and be proven a fool. Think on this before you respond.

Submitted by Councilman "Pinocchio" Fidler (not verified) on Sun, 05/06/2007 - 11:26am.
HERE ARE SOME FACTS ABOUT THE PUPPET MAN
Councilman "Pinocchio" Fidler Said: 
"I did NOT announce that I was not running for anything ever again on Sunday. I said I was not running for anything, now and did not know if I would ever have the privilege again absent a change in term limits."
Real Fact:
1. You know there will be no change in Term Limits.  Council Speaker Quinn campaign for mayor will be destroyed if she lets a Term Limits bill pass the council under her watch. 
TERM LIMITS EXTENSION DEAD COUNCILMAN PINOCCHIO.  THIS IS YOUR RED HERRING TO GET OUT OF BACKING A HAITIAN COUNCIL CANDIDATE
2. You said that because you did not want to support Haitian candidate Mercedes Narcisse for the seat your being term limited out of.  
Fidler Said:

 My Club president is not mad at me. At least not according to the last conversation I had with her two days ago. (BTW, for the hater who wrote I opposed Haitian empowerment, my club president is a Haitian woman despite the faact that my Assembly District is a majority white.)

Councilman "Pinocchio" Fidler said:

"Georgia Hamilton MacBride was a member of the NAB in Canarsie long before I hired her husband Danny MacBride to work in my district office. At the time, she was a full resident of Canarsie, and VP of the 69th Precinct Community Council. Excuse HER for getting married, having a baby and moving to Flatlands. Her resignation had nothing to do with her husband's position. It was probably the recent birth of her child."

 

Fact:

Georgia MacBride was voting on the NAB for over a year and a half after she moved out of Canarsie and you knew because her husband who works for you Danny changed to change his address with your office.  When the newspaper the Skyline got wind of the story Georgia was forced to quit.

 

FIDLER FOR SOMEONE WITH CONNECTIONS TO SO MANY LOCAL NEWSPAPER AND IS QUICK TO DROP A QUOTE TO POLITICAL REPORTERS WHO FOR ANY POLITICAL REPORTER WHO DO NOT KNOW 10% OF WHAT YOU KNOW.  WHY ARE YOU KNOW ON THE STREET AS COUNCILMAN "PINOCCHIO" Fidler

Why did you take campaign money from Frank Seddio when he was running for Surrogate Judge.  Do you fell guilty for his fall from power.  Was there an attempt of a cover up when you returned the money to him Councilman "Pinocchio" Fidler?

Daily News Editorial: "After we reported that Seddio had funneled campaign funds to buddies as he finagled the coveted judgeship from the Brooklyn Democratic machine, he became the subject of an investigation by the Commission on Judicial Conduct. He told pals he's quitting out of boredom, having taken office only last year. Right."  May 5th 2005


Submitted by 41AD Voter (not verified) on Sun, 05/06/2007 - 4:00pm.

Now I know why Fidler's club president Mercedes Narcisse quit!

Sure you have no problem with Narcisse as you say and sure term limits will be change so you can run again

Councilman "Pinocchio" Fidler


Submitted by 41st Club Member (not verified) on Sun, 05/06/2007 - 7:38pm.
Mercedes quit? That's news to us. God, we love that lady. Almost as much as we love our Coucnilman/District Leader.  
Submitted by Sojourn to Truth (not verified) on Sun, 05/06/2007 - 8:12pm.

Dear Foolio,

You have a ridiculous agenda against Fidler. Mercedes Narcisse has not quit as his Club President and your vicious attempts to spread BS on this blog, will always be belied by the truth.

Go home. You have written nothing on this blog that is close to the full truth about anything.


Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sun, 05/06/2007 - 8:48pm.

Rock says - but you are admiring a black man gleefully being showcased on the roof top of the white boys penthouse.

Rock, you are right about C.R.

Now let me ask you a question. Which black man can we really admire that has not been showcased on the roof top of the white boys penthouse and is it really possible to not be showcased? In other words are they only there because ?

Keep it real with your answer because there is only one.


Rock Hackshaw's picture
Submitted by Rock Hackshaw on Sun, 05/06/2007 - 11:08pm.
Look, I respect Charlie Rangel,I really do; but like the rest of black electeds, he too has failed to lead us (as a race here) out of this mess that we are in. I am not telling you that white electeds are "all that", but they have been at this "elected stuff" way way longer, and they are much better at representing their districts than blacks, hispanics and other non-whites. Overwhelmingly, most of the "pork" in budgets (at any of the three levels of government), get to white districts when compared to others. It also gets to entrenched white interests (corporate or otherwise). That's "somewhat" understandable at this point in american history (but not fair). However, white electeds have also failed us as a nation. They have failed to be part of the solution. Only when desperation sets in they start looking to do things. They too are more re-active than pro-active. Didn't we not see what happened with "Hurricane Katrina"? Look, there are many brilliant (intellectually) elected officials of all races and nationalities; but as I always say: "collectively" they have been rather dissappointing. White electeds have failed to acknowledge that "racism" is the invisible hand behind the myriad problems plaguing the black community. This "denial" has them frozen.

Submitted by Prodigy (not verified) on Mon, 05/07/2007 - 1:54am.

With all due respect, I think the Black elected officials are doing a great job. I know they aren't perfect and have a lot of learning to do, ultimately they are doing a great job. Let me just state a disclaimer, "it's easy to ridicule a person in the ring when you're sitting on the sidelines." And It's really true. I used to do that. However as the years went by, instead of me complaining and criticizing, I got involved.

There are a myriad of Black electeds (BEs), some good, some bad and some needing help. We all need to support them and by helping them, we uplift ourselves. We are always, I mean always talking bad about eachother. Let's just get involved. Secondly, we need to give credit where credit is due. (I'm about to get on my soap-box). Most of the BEs, worked hard to get where they are today. Some are immigrants and Americans who worked hard against all odds. We need to stop comparing ourselves to the white race. Yes they have been involved in political office more than us. So what! That would make sense that they would know how the system works better than us too. If we was in office longer than the Whites, they would feel the same way we are feeling right now.

The question is what are we going to do about it?  Are we always going to complain and say that the BEs are a disgrace and leave it like that? I agree to some extent that racism is a strong factor that is played out in the America. But the question I raise again is WHAT ARE WE GOING TO DO ABOUT IT?

 


Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 05/07/2007 - 10:53pm.

We need to stop comparing ourselves to the white race. Yes they have been involved in political office more than us. So what! That would make sense that they would know how the system works better than us too. If we was in office longer than the Whites, they would feel the same way we are feeling right now. LOL.

The elected officials have to stop kissing the asses of the white race and give them a mental challenge. It is really sad that our elected officials are mentally slow and can not keep up. I am not praising Rock, but if they had his brain then maybe things would be different.

They do not know how the system works better than us. Divide and conquer. We are divided and they are united. I have alot of respect for Rock the man knows the deal.


Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 05/11/2007 - 7:54pm.
you suck Rock
Submitted by Concerned Resident and Mother of 18th Senate District (not verified) on Mon, 06/04/2007 - 12:18am.

I read an article in the Village Voice date November 16th 2004 titled Million-Dollar Blocks. The Million-Dollar Blocks refer to sections of the 18th Senatorial District and other predominantely Minority districts in Brooklyn, that spend approximately 1 million dollars each year locking up our youth upstate New York. http://www.villagevoice.com/news/0446,gonnerman,58490,1.html here's the link should you care to read it. We have been represented by Sen Montgomery for some 20 + years, and yes the Democrats have been in the Minority for many of those years. But surely I ask myself, (and I'm just a mere working class mother) if your Community is in need of resources and you are not in the position as an elected official to bring those much need resources to your Community do you just throw up your hands and repeat at every single meeting, forum, community event, that you cannot bring home the bacon because the Republicians are in the Majority. Can't you sit down woman to man or woman to woman and work out some way your Commuinty can get some well needed, and well overdue money to keep our youth from being an economic commodity for Upstate New York. Ok if that does not work, tell me are Government Dollars the only resource. I attended a Youth Forum hosted by Sen Montgomery a few months ago, were I later read in The Daily News that 200 youth were in attendance, (I must have been at a different meeting, but they mentioned the same school and date in the article) there was not 200 people in attendance let alone 200 youth, and the event consisted of a panel from different entities who where there to address the concerns that a few youth got up and read what their concerns were. No disrespect to the Panel but none of them judging by their answers were in a position to say that the issues raised were something they could effect change to. I find this an insult of my intelligence and disrespectful of my son and other children who have to navigate this community with all its gapping pitfalls to be given lipservice by the one person who is supposed to serve the people who ELECTED YOU to SERVE THEM. Our community is in this mess because for too long we have settled for lipservice from elected officials who we only see when it is time for re-election. I deserve more, my son deserves more, all the children of the community deserve more. But I see by the tone of some anonymus bloggers or are they anonymus elected officials, that instead of addressing the issues at hand they rather attack a persons character. I hope the comment from Anon stating that Mr. Herbert had abandon his beautiful daughter was her mother, for only she, his daughter, and Mr Herbert himself have to address that issue. Being a mother myself and living in the real world parents and teenagers donot always see eye to eye. And god forbid the comment came from someone who does not have children then you should be ashamed of yourself. But then again if you could post a statement like that in a public forum you have no shame and are not really concerned with the youth of this community. Address the issues it seems that according to Mr Hackshaws interview with Mr. Herbert he has some ideas that could result in solutions. If he can put things together that can benefit our youth and he is not an elected official, I don't think I'm being stupid in realizing that he would be able to do even more if he were an elected official. Mr. Hackshaw I thank you for doing what all resposnsible citizens should be doing and presenting alternatives to things that have not work toward the betterment of our community for many years.


Rock Hackshaw's picture
Submitted by Rock Hackshaw on Sun, 06/17/2007 - 11:47am.
Thanks for your kind sentiments.

Submitted by Abel Rice (not verified) on Tue, 11/20/2007 - 3:48pm.

molochize antilaborist hydromeningocele powerlessly turricle turbogenerator conelet beaconwise
Tregelberg German Shepherds
http://aahc.info/


Submitted by Kris Sharpe (not verified) on Sun, 11/25/2007 - 5:43am.
molochize antilaborist hydromeningocele powerlessly turricle turbogenerator conelet beaconwise Durango & Silverton Narrow Gauge Railroad Museum http://www.census.gov/sdms/www/vwelcome.html
Submitted by Daniel Douglas (not verified) on Thu, 11/29/2007 - 12:14am.
molochize antilaborist hydromeningocele powerlessly turricle turbogenerator conelet beaconwise Avro Vulcan B2 (XL319) - North East Aircraft Museum http://chillgardendesign.co.uk
Submitted by Josefina Anthony (not verified) on Sun, 12/16/2007 - 6:27pm.

unmatronlike kymatology reunitedly sowfoot consentful seabeard pensy clodder
http://www.ptsoutsanis.gr >Tsoutsanis, Pericles
http://art.evansville.edu/


Submitted by Geralyn Rivas (not verified) on Wed, 02/06/2008 - 6:16pm.
chair pensacola skeletal fallotomy cyanine unconceited cowpen stillicidium Discount Cigarettes Tobacco And Snuff http://uucpnpjhvffhbksx.com/13969 Apartment Houston Locator http://uucpnpjhvffhbksx.com/4728 Free Pram Plans http://uucpnpjhvffhbksx.com/18445 Texas Divorce Records http://uucpnpjhvffhbksx.com/21604 Delta State Football http://uucpnpjhvffhbksx.com/21251 Cartoon Killer Whale http://uucpnpjhvffhbksx.com/24904 Max Payne 2 http://uucpnpjhvffhbksx.com/13532 Sanitary Stainless Tubing http://uucpnpjhvffhbksx.com/23679 Hate Breed Videos For Myspace http://uucpnpjhvffhbksx.com/4437 Ladies Italian Tank Tops http://uucpnpjhvffhbksx.com/209
Submitted by Avis Hamilton (not verified) on Fri, 02/22/2008 - 2:24pm.

chair pensacola skeletal fallotomy cyanine unconceited cowpen stillicidium
http://1ok.gzngtj.net/ >Body Piercing A Guide For Teens
http://cw.whpjnz.net/
http://1mi.tbaiuqlz.net/ >Spca Sacramento California
http://23y.yirivuvbp.net/
http://23a.sjnhbqre.net/ >Top 10 Perfume
http://2hc.pbhfgbs.net/


Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.