Should Fossella having mistress and love child mean he has to resign?

Staten Island congressman Vito Fossella is under heavy pressure to resign because he has admitted to having a long term mistress and that they had a three year old love child. Is this worse than Eliot Spitzer hiring prostitutes? Is the private life of any public official really more important than the job they do? I think Fossella has been a lousy congressman, but is his having a second family any of our business? If Spitzer was a good governor, did it matter if on his own time he was paying for sex?

Are we requiring public officials to be morally perfect now? It is not like Fossella is the only person in his district who has kept a mistress or had a child with a woman who was not his wife. Or gotten a dui.

I want Fossella voted out of office based on his performance and poor political views. But the fact that he may have a less than perfect private life is not a reason for him to resign.



Submitted by EnWhySeaWonk on Fri, 05/09/2008 - 5:31pm.

Eliot Spitzer deserved what he got. He campaigned on being "Holier-than-thou" against everyone. If he'd been elected without doing that, I might agree with you.

Frankly I don't know much about Fosella, but if he's a "Family Values' Republican who votes "morally" on issues and claims the "moral high ground" for supporting these "family values," then he also deserves to be thrown out of office for having a double standard.

I'm a lot more forgiving of people who do things in their personal life when their politics reflect a strong support of privacy and civil rights. I suspect Vito would not pass this test.


Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 05/09/2008 - 9:39pm.
Let us voters make that decision for him.  I don't have much of a problem finding out that he led a 2nd life even though he portrayed himself as a wonderful family man,  but I do have a problem with his DWI.  Drunk driving is a crime and Vito could have injured or killed someone. 
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sat, 05/10/2008 - 12:30am.
Several years ago former Republican State Senator Guy Velella from the Bronx and Westchester had a Love Child and he was not made to resign.  Our current Democratic Governor had a relationship outside of his marriage.  He was not asked to resign.  Many of these elected officials do things that they wish would not be brought out in public.  We do not elect them for who they are sleeping with, we elect them for what they can do for us.  No he should not resign.
Submitted by Honest John (not verified) on Sat, 05/10/2008 - 9:47am.

Guy Velella was protect for years by organize crime which controls the local DAs.

Just look at the secret police being run out of the Power Authority?  Where are the liberal ass holes on this issue. 

 


Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sun, 05/11/2008 - 9:17am.
At least this right to life Congressman didn't force his mistress to abort the baby.  A man of true conviction.
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sun, 05/11/2008 - 9:36pm.
What a moral man for not aborting the child.  I wonder if this upstanding Republican is a member of the Moral Majority.
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 05/12/2008 - 2:00pm.

A much bigger issue I think is that it has come out that Fossella carried on with his mistress on several trips paid for by taxpayers, which were supposed to be all-business.  Apparently Vito and his girlfriend traveled all over europe on two ten day trips, and a third trip to France, spending their time together instead of with the Congressional delegation.

Having taxpayers pay for vacation junkets is a no-no.  Highly unethical.  Vito should be made to refund all the costs for those trips. 


Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 05/12/2008 - 4:04pm.

The Velella and Fossella cases are different. In 1987, when the Velella love child story broke, Velella was never arrested for a crime. Fossella has been arrested for DUI in addition to his love child. Like Velella, Fossella did present himself as a family man in his campaigns.

A political difference is that Velella's scandal broke in a non-election year. By the time he was campaigning for re-election, most voters had put the scandal aside.

Fossella's problems broke in an election year. He could cost the GOP the seat. The question is whether he should simply not run for re-election and let another Republican run and keep the seat for the GOP.


Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.