Why are liberal progressive rallies/marches so often racially segregated?

This afternoon I was proud to march up sixth avenue and back down second avenue, to the United Nations, in the latest anti-Iraq war rally sponsored by United for Peace and Justice. It was a great event, many thousands of people chanting "we will not be silent", "bring our troops home" .etc Even some of the cops guarding the march route joined in on the chanting. Great liberal progressive comraderie, met a lot of cool people.

The last march I attended in midtown was a couple of months back, the Sean Bell rally. There too great liberal progressive comraderie, met a lot of cool people.

But there was a difference between the two marches. In the Bell march, I was among very few whites in a sea of african american faces. At the anti-war rally today, I was in a sea of almost all white faces. The fact is that neither march reflected the diversity of New York City. It reflected different communities, or different demographics, apparently having mostly different priorities. Yet these communities share the same political beliefs and world outlook for the most part. Which leads to the question, why don't more of the same people come to both of these kinds of marches?

Recently I finished Taylor Branch's fine "At Canaan's Edge: America in the King Years 1965-1968", and in this book it details Martin Luther King's last years, when he started going to anti-vietnam war rallies despite the objections of some of his top lietenants at SCLC, who felt like the vietnam war wasn't their fight. King tried to tell people that the three major problems he saw in the world (racism, poverty, war) were in actuality the same problem. Which comes down to how human beings live and relate to each other.

Racism is at the heart of violence in the Sean Bell shootings, and it is also at the heart of the Iraq war. So in my mind I don't understand why more of the people out there marching today in the anti-war march weren't at the Bell march, and why more of the Bell marchers don't come out for anti-war marches. This speaks to a weakness on the left, the inability to bring the different communities together for common cause, and surely that is in part failure to link all these problems in the world together as King was trying to do before he died.

The question then becomes, how do we change this? How does United for Peace and Justice, or other anti-war groups get more african americans to come to their marches, and how do organizers of civil rights marches like Reverend Sharpton get more whites to come to their events? How do we bring all communities together?



Rock Hackshaw's picture
Submitted by Rock Hackshaw on Sun, 03/18/2007 - 5:36pm.
To rwallnerny..... I swear there are many of you. It must be some kind of multiple personality disorder, because sometimes you actually make sense.

MediaShuffle's picture
Submitted by MediaShuffle on Sun, 03/18/2007 - 6:20pm.
Thanks for all the traffic today! :)

Submitted by Tom on Sun, 03/18/2007 - 6:30pm.

I was flipping channels today and stopped on Like it is for a minute and I was surprised to learn that the majority of African Americans have opposed wars. Very interesting factoid if it's true.

I think leaders in each camp are responsible for bringing everyone together. I went to the protest/rally for Amadou Dialo during Giuliani and there was a wide spectrum (in terms of race and age) of people at that event.


Submitted by jr (not verified) on Sun, 03/18/2007 - 10:14pm.
my friends got their site shut down for using a photo of one of sean bell's killers 31 shot mike
it's crazy but you can follow the story here
http://propagandapress.wordpress.com/
Submitted by Ven Kamares (not verified) on Mon, 03/19/2007 - 7:15am.

It's nice to make friends, but how much opportunity is afforded by a "crowd of 2,000" (Daily News)?  Mass gatherings will raise endorphins as you report (in good weather), but a "crowd of 2,000" is laughable in comparison to the likes of big concerts and sports events.  War, poverty and racism are not obviously connected, except that it's virtuous to be against all three. Self-regard also makes people feel good.  The black cop in the Sean Bell case surely is insulted by race claims.     


Submitted by Joe Futuro (not verified) on Mon, 03/19/2007 - 8:33am.
There hasn't been a major demo in NYC since 1982 (nuclear issues).  That's a long time.  The Tibetans turn out 2,000 at   Dag Hammarskjold a couple of times a year. This thing the other day is totally self-referential.  If you see a mass movement, you can't have much personal history.  Not to mention how things have changed.  So quaintly anachronistic to talk about meeting attractive people at street rallys.  Who is this guy?              
Submitted by Andres Duque (not verified) on Tue, 03/20/2007 - 3:07pm.
Blogger Keith Boykin has shared some thoughts on this issue in the past. Particularly in "Why is the peace movement so white?" from February.
Submitted by Ignatz (not verified) on Wed, 03/21/2007 - 9:31am.

The reason our marches are segregated is because there is no LEADER.  We need another MLK.  Who among us is willing to stand up and bridge the gap?  Instead we have Kramer getting airplay when most whites are nauseated by his behavior. 

Open message to all - start attending your progressive meetings.  Thereyou will be received with open arms. Our agenda is the scarily similar.

Man, I remember the 60's - our music reflected our passion - so many racially mixed groups, the music presented a united front against the war.  It was beautiful. 

 


Submitted by reconquerir son ex (not verified) on Tue, 01/24/2012 - 9:12pm.
I am delighted that I found this weblog, exactly the right information that I was looking for!

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.