Going Through the Motions

Yesterday the legislative stars aligned - if only for a fleeting moment - as I was able to address the Senate about one of my bills. Currently, I have 16 active bills being considered by various committees, and have publicly addressed my Senate colleagues only once this session. It will also probably be the last time due to the rules that govern the New York State Senate.

Being a Democrat dooms my legislation before it is even conceived. Once a bill of mine gets introduced, it goes to committee where it waits for a vote. And waits. And waits. And waits.

No rule exists that requires committees to take vote on a piece of legislation. Thus, it is almost a certainty that Democratic bills will go through an entire legislative session without one minute of substantive public debate or discussion. Then they die.

There does exist one small opening, called a motion to petition, which allows me to bring a bill sitting in committee to a vote before the full Senate. If the full body votes to bring the bill out of committee, then it is introduced on the floor for another round of votes. It used to be that a Senator was given 5 minutes to speak on a motion. The Senate Majority, having adopted the barest minimum of the Brennan Center’s reform proposals, gave me 10 minutes before they killed my bill. Further debate is expressly prohibited by the Senate rules.

As expected, my motion was not carried. Every Republican voted along party lines. Actually, they didn’t even vote or go on the record. They just made sure to keep their hands down or conveniently step out of the chamber. Senate rules do not require attendance during a motion.

Two days ago, motions from my colleagues Senator Eric Schneiderman and Senator Liz Krueger, which I had the pleasure of cosponsoring, were similarly rejected. In fact, a Democratic bill has never been brought out of committee by a motion to petition. What is supposed to be a safety valve against domination by leadership, just helps to further cement that control.

It is a problem that good ideas are discarded in Albany simply because they do not come from the majority party. My bill would have helped to increase parental involvement in our schools, by providing translation services to parents with a limited command of English. It is a well-documented fact that children do much better in school when their parents are involved. Senator Schneiderman’s bill would have made it harder for criminals to get guns. Senator Krueger’s bill would have helped keep our environment clean, while promoting job growth here in New York State.

Education, safety, environmental protection and job creation are only a few of the big issues that affect people in every Senate district. Effectively silencing almost half of the Senate will not help us tackle these problems any quicker.



Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 04/10/2008 - 8:49pm.

I do not disagree with Senator Serrano, changes in Albany need to be made for more transparency and democracy. There should be more committee debates and legislation should be brought to the floor.

Now, do you hold the same discontent for the Democrats who control the Assembly because they work the same way?


Submitted by Upstate's Finest (not verified) on Thu, 04/10/2008 - 10:23pm.

If you keep introducing bills like S.6738 (Establishes a process for the regulation of collecting, recording, and disclosing confidential information by state employees.) than it's no surprise your legislation goes nowhere.


Rock Hackshaw's picture
Submitted by Rock Hackshaw on Fri, 04/11/2008 - 12:53am.
I know that there is more (and less) to this article, but it is (still) one of the most profound (and there have been many) ever written in Room Eight's young history. This article explains one of the many reasons why I voted for Tom Suozzi over Eliot Spitzer (despite being near certain that he was going to get crushed in the race; and despite my publicly suggesting that he should have pulled out of the race before the petitions circulated- for the sake of party unity and such).

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 04/11/2008 - 10:32am.

I am curious to see what happens if the Democrats take the Senate majority in the upcoming election. Will you still be saying this if your party supplants the current majority?

If the actions of your compatriots in the Assembly are any indication, Senate Republicans are not alone in suppressing the minority. Its easy to cry for reform when you are the one being marginalized. I hope you find it just as easy if should find yourself on the other side. 


Submitted by nymaverick on Fri, 04/11/2008 - 9:33pm.

Say Malcolm Smith is right and nobody cares what Eliot Spitzer did in stocking feet or wants to know which hotel stays David Paterson paid or with taxpayer dollars. Say, after November, your party has taken the Senate majority and you are re-elected.

Since we're being so agreeable, let's say it's a landslide victory and you have tons of campaign cash left over to lavish your friends with lobster dinners.

I am exceedingly cynical about people in general and politicians in particular.

Respectfully, Senator, I defy you to prove me wrong. Craft legislation that requires not just the presence of a quorum to do business, but also votes from a quorum. At the least, prod Mr. Smith into stating a Party policy to take the high road and at least tell to your colleagues across the aisle that you will in fact vote against them rather than give them the silent treatment.

Maybe, if that lobster is particularly good, you might prod him into declaring that a Democratic majority in the state Senate will even take a few moments to clearly explain why it is against each bill it kills, on or off the floor. Call it a statement of political responsibility.

And pass the shrimp cocktail.

 

---

New-York Maverick


Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sat, 07/19/2008 - 11:47pm.

hey senator, how about legislation clearing felonies from your rap sheet after 10 years of good conduct?  other states have it.

 


Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.