|
|
Billary Will Burn in Hell With The Sodomites
[EDITOR'S NOTE: The AP Wire Reports that this piece was posted from the author's blackberry seconds before he was apprehened by the police outside of a gay nightclub in Chelsea, shouting at passer-bys, asking which one of them was EnWhySeaWonk. Police said that while searching him, attendent to an arrest for public drunkeness and disturbing the peace, they found three Saturday Night Specials, an Uzi submachine gun, a box of condoms, a tube of KY Jelly and handwritten list of names which included EnWhySeaWonk, Yoda, Gatemouth, JP, Cynical Negro, Politiko, Kevin Parker, Charlie Rangel, Jacob Walthour, Matthieu Eugene and Yvette and Una Clarke.] As my daddy used to say, “Man plans and God laughs”; just when you think you are on top of the world you get bowled a googly. Nonetheless, there is a third point to the hat trick: “Man plans, God laughs, but Stoned Crackwhore prognosticates”. When it comes to saying sooth and speaking truth, old Nostradomus is to ole Stone as a one hit wonder like Smiley Culture is to the Mighty Mighty Sparrow. But while Uncle Stoney is channeling Sparrow, all the other bloggers are eating crow. Maybe they should try it jerked (no pun intended Wonk). LOL! I am not overrating myself; I am just giving you the FACTS. I am quite safe in who I am. It is always easy after the event to say and call it; but were you (anyone) brave enough to go out on a limb, over and over, while being unafraid of risking credibility. That's the point here; and the main point here. I have been in political trenches all my life and in the womb; plus I studied political science and graduated from an ivy league university. It is easy for most folks to put down; but somehow it is difficult to build up or give credit where it was due. Some people need to go back and look at their respective responses to my observations and / or predictions here. It could be quite edifying. It is always easy after the event to call the winner. Why didn't ANYONE ANYWHERE call Iowa the way I did; and also when I did. Not even Tim Russert, Donna Brazille, Chris Matthews, any member of the McLaughlin crew, or ANY heavyweight in mainstream media,call it: EVEN UP TO ELECTION DAY. I called it almost two months before the race; and I had the article submitted to my editors in time for Thanksgiving (GO CHECK). The article appeared on Room8, Daily Gotham, and was further linked to Politico and other national blogs; plus it was carried in the Politicker (Daily Observer) and Daily News blogs (go check for yourself).
I based my prediction on inside info (I would say no more on this one); plus personal analysis based on observations (something developed over a lifetime of political involvement/activism, and including of a degree in political science-from an ivy-league university that is one of Barack Obama's alma maters); plus dissection of media reports; plus scouring through conventional and unconventional media sources (internet included); plus discussions with many people; plus historically analyzing mainstream media trends; plus analyzing polling info (also in historical context); plus getting reports from the ground/trenches; plus sticking close to the national and regional blogs; plus studying intently Obama's moves and strategies; plus being involved with and close to many of his organizations (members and campaign staffers); ETCETERA; ETCETERA. Believe me when I say that more went into this call. Plus; I risked my credibility as a blogger/news reporter/ journalist/activist/ and such, by going out on a limb to make one of the gutsiest calls ever made in politics here. If you had the dope: why didn't you do it? This was one of the greatest calls (given it was historical) ever made in politics anywhere in this country. Remember this: very few have the moral courage to support the success of others without envy I started that article first week of November and finished it around the 2nd week. I e-mailed it off to my editors here (and also those at at the Daily Gotham) before Thanksgiving. It got caught up in(and delayed because of) the holiday shuffle. It was posted on Daily Gotham somewhere around Nov. 23rd.(go see for yourself). It was put up on R8 soon after. It was first posted at least 6 full weeks before the primary. Long before any polls showing the race closing etc. It was linked to Daily News blog, Politicker, Politico and many other blogs (check them all for your self) within a few days. BUT: go back (and I hope you do this) to my article (Obama #3)of the first week of JULY. READ IT THEN TELL ME SOMETHING. I DARE YOU. I CALLED THIS LONG AGO. After you do that read Obama #s 1 and 2. GIVE ME MY DUE . BE HONEST AND FACTUAL. NO ONE CALLED THIS PHENOMENON LIKE I DID SINCE ONE YEAR AGO, AND CONTINUED TO CALL IT AS IT WAS EVOLVING.
I never said I DISTINCTLY called it prior to November, except for saying a few qualifying things like (a) if he was totally white (and not just half-white), it would be a wrap (Jan/ Feb. 2007); (2) the only things stopping him from being president are cousins: RACISM- with its octopussian tentacles; and ASSASINATION- either political or physical in nature (July 2007). With those statements in mind (almost a year now in origins), plus the depth,width,length and breadth of all my articles on him (especially the initial 3-part series of Jan, Feb and then July); WHAT THE HELL WAS I CALLING? Didn't you see my thoughts evolving as I researched and developed more info? In November I said I am willing to BET and GIVE ODDS (damn); how deep a call is that? Did anyone even suggest that? NO. NO ONE. NOWHERE. Almost two months out. There were no polls showing him winning when I did this (check for yourself/ ask my editors when I submitted my finished product). Go to the various blogs of those weeks in November. I still haven't disclosed all my reasonning for this call. I also said I wont call NH then; what do you think I was alluding to (go read the "Iowa" prediction again). It was a direct and CONFIDENT call (unambiguous, unequivocal and unqualified). I then called NH and SC ; GEEZE; what else do you want? This was one of the greatest public political calls -given its historical nature- of any political analyst in the history of this country. YOU ALL KNOW IT. If I was WHITE I would get the kudos; but I am not; so I get ragged instead (as usual). If you have read my Obama series, you will see serious analysis, observations and insight offered in a unique way; why is that so hard to admit. That's why I will be gone from here one of these days; there is no fucking appreciation for what I do here. and when i do, this site will be ten times worse than it is now. And please don’t tell me that Hillary won New Hampshire. Next thing you’ll tell me is that Vince Foster died from self inflicted wounds, when all the evidence clearly shows otherwise: SummariesThe EvidenceReports- Fiske Report - Summary - from the Congressional Record, June 30, 1994
- Fiske Report - Report of the Independent Counsel In Re Vincent W. Foster, Jr., Washington, D.C., June 30, 1994, Robert B. Fiske, Jr., Independent Counsel
- Citizen's Independent Report, Material Errors, Omissions, Inconsistencies, & Curiosa, The 1994 US Senate Whitewater Hearings Documents Re: The Death of White House Deputy Counsel Vincent W. Foster, Jr. - by Hugh H. Sprunt, July 20, 1995 (revised October 8, 1995)
Body in the Park (news stories)- Gonzalez rejects panel probe into death of Foster - by Jerry Seper, The Washington Times, June 21, 1994
- Park Police officer gets himself a lawyer - by Jerry Seper, The Washington Times, July 15, 1994
- Fiske ignores questions on Foster death - by Jerry Seper, The Washington Times, July 19, 1994
- Grand jury probes Foster death - Accuracy in Media (Media Monitor), February 3 and 6, 1995
- Senate exposes flaws in Foster probe - Accuracy in Media (Media Monitor), February 13, 1995
- Doubts linger over Clinton aide's 'suicide' - by Ambrose Evans-Pritchard, Electronic Telegraph, March 20, 1995
- White House aide was murdered, say experts - by Ambrose Evans-Pritchard, Electronic Telegraph, May 1, 1995
- Forensics expert to review Foster facts - by Jerry Seper, The Washington Times, June 10, 1995
- Depositions begin with Park Police sergeant - by Jerry Seper, The Washington Times, June 20, 1995
- Review of Foster death not finished - by Jerry Seper, The Washington Times, July 4, 1995
- White House death: murder theory comes under scrutiny - by Ambrose Evans-Pritchard, Electronic Telegraph, July 31, 1995
- Gingrich enters Foster 'suicide' row - by Ambrose Evans-Pritchard, Electronic Telegraph, July 31, 1995
- One in five fear cover-up in White House lawyer's death - by Hugh Davies, Electronic Telegraph, August 3, 1995
- Secret service link in death of Clinton aide - by Ambrose Evans-Pritchard, Electronic Telegraph, August 7, 1995
- Senate fumbles, Gingrich recovers - Accuracy in Media (Media Monitor), August 10, 1995
- D'Amato seeking answers to questions about Foster's death - by Christopher Ruddy, Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, September 14, 1995
- New hunt for bullet that killed US aide - by Stephen Robinson, Electronic Telegraph, September 15, 1995
- Police failed to find keys to Foster's car at park - by Christopher Ruddy, Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, September 20, 1995
- New face emerges in probe of Vincent Foster's death - by Christopher Ruddy, Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, October 20, 1995
- `New' evidence in Foster case would strain credibility - by Christopher Ruddy, Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, October 26, 1995
- Foster report said to contain new, unusual evidence - by Christopher Ruddy, Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, November 13, 1995
- Controversial Lee to issue report on Foster's death - by Christopher Ruddy, Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, November 24, 1995
- Despite evidence, FBI ends two death probes - by Christopher Ruddy, Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, December 10, 1995
- Pathologist, FBI go way back - by Christopher Ruddy, Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, December 10, 1995
- Aide says Foster left with briefcase, contradicts claims - by Christopher Ruddy, Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, February 4, 1996
- Troopers: Investigator sought testimony changes - by Christopher Ruddy, Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, February 11, 1996
- The Vince Foster Investigation - An Update - CBN "NewsWatch Today", February 29, 1996
- It's `desperation time' for Clintons as Whitewater trail continues to widen - by Christopher Ruddy, Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, March 3, 1996
- FOIA Suit For Handwritten FBI Notes Succeeds - by Hugh Sprunt, posted to the Internet March 6, 1996
- CHRIS RUDDY interviewed by Chuck Harder, March 22, 1996
- New prosecutor joins Starr, probe - by Christopher Ruddy, Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, March 26, 1996
- Key Foster witness cites discrepancies - by Christopher Ruddy, Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, April 24, 1996
- Thomases' Testimony Re Last Meeting With Foster - by Hugh Sprunt, posted to the Internet May 15, 1996
- Thomases cites statement errors in Fiske report - by Christopher Ruddy, Western Journalism Center Dispatches, May 22, 1996
- Info From FBI Handwritten Notes Re Foster Witness - by Hugh Sprunt, posted to the Internet May 27, 1996
- Livingstone and the Foster mystery - by John Crudele, July 1, 1996
- Troubles at home dog Mrs Clinton in Europe - by Hugh Davies, Electronic Telegraph, July 2, 1996
- Whitewater ripples - Progressive Review, July 5, 1996
- Foster 'hired detective to spy on Clinton' - by Ambrose Evans-Pritchard, Electronic Telegraph, July 15, 1996
- Starr hires new expert with old ties to review Foster findings - by Christopher Ruddy, Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, August 14, 1996
- Former security chief Livingstone questioned after Foster's suicide - by Christopher Ruddy, Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, September 29, 1996
- Hugh Sprunt's Letter to Dr. Cyril Wecht (author of Grave Secrets), October 10, 1996
- Foster case: Book says there's 'new' evidence - by Christopher Ruddy, Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, October 29, 1996
- Wecht advised second autopsy to end Foster case speculation - by Christopher Ruddy, Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, November 15, 1996
- Foster dead . . .and so Clinton goes to bed - by Ambrose Evans-Pritchard, Electronic Telegraph, December 15, 1996
- Investigative reporters say Clinton being protected - by Tom Aikens, Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, January 29, 1997
About "60 Minutes" Story on Foster's Death- Mike Wallace's Fake Foster Probe - by Reed Irvine and Joe Goulden, Accuracy in Media, October 11, 1995
- The Maggot Report (from True Witness) Vol. 3, October 14, 1995
- Wallace and Ruddy: a journalistic drive-by shooting - by Deroy Murdoch, Orange County Register, October 15, 1995
- Allegations Regarding Vince Foster, the NSA, and Banking Transactions Spying, Part XXXVI - by J. Orlin Grabbe, posted to the Internet December 1995
About A&E's "Investigative Reports"- WHITEWASH - "Investigative Reports" "Examines" Vince Foster Death (Arts & Entertainment cable TV, October 5, 1996) - by Brian Redman, "Conspiracy Nation", October 5, 1996
The GunThe "Suicide" Note- Image of the note - high resolution, suitable for printing on a laser printer, shows on your screen enlarged 4.17 times. For viewing the note on your screen, try the low-resolution version.
- Side-by-side comparison of the note with genuine samples of Foster's handwriting.
- Was Foster's Note Fabricated? - by Marvin Lee, Washington Weekly, September 6, 1994
- Was Foster's "Suicide" Note Forged? - Accuracy in Media, August 1995
- An Independent Forensic Examination Of a Torn Note Allegedly Written by Vincent W. Foster, Jr. - Prepared for Strategic Investment, James Dale Davidson, Editor, 25 October 1995
- Experts: Foster note fake - by Christopher Ruddy, Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, October 25, 1995
- Vince Foster suicide note forged, say experts - by Stephen Robinson, Electronic Telegraph, October 26, 1995
- Transcript of CBN News "700 Club" broadcast, October 26, 1995
- Quiet British professor who could destroy Clinton - by Gill Harley, London Sunday Express, October 29, 1995
- Experts Say Foster's Suicide Note Was a Forgery - by Reed Irvine and Joseph Goulden, Accuracy in Media, November 2, 1995
- Vince Foster's death on "Unsolved Mysteries" TV show, March 22, 1996
- More on Vince Foster - by Nick Chase, The Contrarian's View, March 29, 1996
- First Lady's Fingerprints on Billing Records - Dan Burton (R-Ind.) before the House, April 30, 1996
- Curious Point About Hillary's Fingerprints on Billing Records - comment by Hugh Sprunt, posted to the Internet April 30, 1996
- Who was the forger? - by Anatoly & Tim, "Spook", posted to the Internet January 31, 1997. Please take this posting with a VERY LARGE grain of salt, as "Spook" offers no credentials as handwriting experts.
"CW" (a confidential witness)Patrick Knowlton (a witness)- Death in the park: is this the killer? - by Ambrose Evans-Pritchard, Electronic Telegraph, October 23, 1995
- Vince Foster Cover-Up Unraveling - by Reed Irvine and Joe Goulden, Accuracy in Media, October 25, 1995
- Park witness to appear before Starr's grand jury in Foster investigation - by Christopher Ruddy, Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, October 29, 1995
- Patrick Knowlton Harassment- excerpts from an Internet post by Hugh Sprunt, October 30,1995
- Washington Notebook: Another mad week in DC - by Ambrose Evans-Pritchard, Electronic Telegraph, November 6, 1995
- Foster case witness `treated like a suspect' - by Christopher Ruddy, Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, November 13, 1995
- Excerpts from an Internet post by Hugh Sprunt, December 4,1995
- Interview with Patrick Knowlton - Marvin Lee, Washington Weekly, December 18, 1995
- Knowlton on CBN "700 Club", February 29, 1996 - by Hugh Sprunt, posted to the Internet March 1, 1996
- Foster grand jury witness questions FBI tactics - by Christopher Ruddy, Western Journalism Center Dispatches, March 27, 1996
- Comments on Chris Ruddy's Article on Foster - by Hugh Sprunt, posted to the Internet April 24, 1996
- THE TRUTH and Vincent Foster - by "Hughie2U", posted to the Internet October 25, 1996
- Clinton aide case witness sues FBI - by Ambrose Evans-Pritchard, Electronic Telegraph, November 10, 1996
- SUIT BY WITNESS ALLEGES FBI COVER-UP - press release, November 11, 1996
- Foster suicide witness: FBI tampered with my testimony - by John Crudele, November 12, 1996
- WESLEY PRUDEN SEEKS ADVICE FROM HUGHIE2U - by "Hughie2U", posted to the Internet December 3, 1996
- The Strange Case of Patrick Knowlton - Progressive Review, December 9, 1996
- Patrick J. Knowlton and his attorney John Clarke on the Bob Grant Show, November 13, 1996
- POLICE ESCORT MAN FROM GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY FOR ASKING A QUESTION - by "Hughie2U", posted to the Internet February 15, 1997
Rifling Foster's Office for Papers- Fiske's focus turns to Foster office search - by Jerry Seper, The Washington Times, July 2, 1994
- Officer saw papers leave Foster's office - by Jerry Seper, The Washington Times, July 10, 1995
- Papers show Foster feared IRS audit - by Jerry Seper and Gretchen Lacharite, The Washington Times, July 15, 1995
- White House denies bid to block access to papers - by Jerry Seper, The Washington Times, July 24, 1995
- Mrs Clinton implicated in 'cover-up' - by Hugh Davies, Electronic Telegraph, August 4, 1995
- Riddle of spooks in the White House - by Ambrose Evans-Pritchard, Electronic Telegraph, January 29, 1996
- Did Clinton counsel 'vacuum' Foster files? - by Christopher Ruddy, Western Journalism Center Dispatches, January 26, 1996
- Conflicting testimony points to possible coverup - by Christopher Ruddy, Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, February 14, 1996
- White House Coverup - Connie Mack (R-Fla.), before the Senate, March 6, 1996
- Alfonse D'Amato (R - N.Y.) speaking in favor of continued funding for investigation of Whitewater, before the Senate, March 7, 1996
- Mrs. Clinton's Fingerprints on Billing Records II - Dan Burton (R-Ind.), before the House, May 10, 1996
- Hillary Clinton accused of cover-up after aide's death - by Hugh Davies, Electronic Telegraph, June 17, 1996
Helen Dickey's Phone CallJerry, Jane & Gary Parks- Phone call rings Clinton alarm bells - by Ambrose Evans-Pritchard, Electronic Telegraph, October 6, 1996
- John Bennett Interviews Gary Parks - Media Distribution, October 10, 1996
- Ambrose Evans-Pritchard interviewed on Quinn in the Morning Show, WRRK 97 FM, Pittsburgh, PA, October 10, 1996
Secret Ties- Secret Swiss link to White House death - by Ambrose Evans-Pritchard, Electronic Telegraph, May 22, 1995
- U.S. Media Ignore Foster's Swiss Trips -Accuracy in Media (Media Monitor), June 8 and 9, 1995
- Interview with Jim Norman - Marvin Lee, Washington Weekly, August 21, 1995
- Validity of "AMEX Charges" Memo - Jim Norman Internet post, October 8, 1995
- Riddle of spooks in the White House - by Ambrose Evans-Pritchard, Electronic Telegraph, January 29, 1996
- Vince Foster and the National Security Agency - by Marvin Lee, The Washington Weekly, May 27, 1996
- THE NATIONAL SECURITY ASPECT OF FOSTER'S DEATH (A Synthesis Of Recent Revelations) - by Marvin Lee, Washington Weekly, December 16, 1996
Politicians' Comments (from the Congressional Record)About Blood Sport and The SYSTEMCommentaries- A Washington Death - a Wall Street Journal editorial, July 22, 1993
- Who Killed Vincent Foster? - by Michael Kinsley, The New Republic, August 16, 1993
- The Three Deaths of Vince Foster - The Economist, February 12, 1994
- Vince Foster's Death Is a Lively Business For Conspiracy Buffs - The Wall Street Journal, March 23, 1995
- America's top newspaper has pointed the finger at our man in Washington. Now it's his turn - by Ambrose Evans-Pritchard, Electronic Telegraph, July 10, 1995
- Whitewater plot theory over death of aide 'a fantasy' - by Hugh Davies, Electronic Telegraph, July 10, 1995
- Lies and Consequences: Foster and The Journal - by Philip Weiss, The New York Observer, October 9, 1995
- Let's put Vince Foster to Rest - by Paul Weyrich, October 31, 1995
- The eerie similarities between Whitewater and Watergate - by Ambrose Evans-Pritchard, Electronic Telegraph, January 15, 1996
- Will Whitewater Boil Over? - by Nick Chase, The Contrarian's View, January 27, 1996
- Richard Clark talks with Hugh Sprunt - posted to the Internet May 20, 1996
- Starrs' Foster Delay Explained - by John Moore, posted to the Internet May 24, 1996
- Foster Discrepancies - by Martin McPhillips, posted to the Internet May 24, 1996
- The "FOSTER MURDER" postcard described by the press on June 3, 1996
- Gun Bluing Wore Off? - by Hugh Sprunt, posted to the Internet June 14, 1996
- The Foster Investigation Continues (Three Years and Counting) - by Edward Zehr, Washington Weekly, July 22, 1996
- Christopher Ruddy interview on Quinn in the Morning Show, WRRK 97 FM, Pittsburgh, PA, November 15, 1996
- Conservatives hide truth - by John Clifton, posted to the Internet December 5, 1996
- OPEN LETTER TO THE HON. DAN BURTON - Reed Irvine and Joseph Goulden, Accuracy in Media, December 19, 1996
- Why is Clinton persecuting me? - by Ambrose Evans-Pritchard, Electronic Telegraph, January 12, 1997
- Re: "Techno-Paranoia in the White House" by David S. Bennahum - letter from Allan J. Favish to The New York Times, posted to the Internet January 25, 1997
- The End of Clinton's Troubles (Selling Access to Lincoln's Bed Really Is the Small Stuff) - by Lila Hoffman-Thome, "What I Think", February 28, 1997
Conspiracy Theories- Two Years After Foster's Death, Conspiracy Theories Thrive - by Susan Schmidt, Washington Post, July 6, 1995
- Letter to NSA from James Leach - July 11, 1995
- Jim Norman interviewed by Tom Valentine on "Radio Free America", July 14, 1995
- Whitewater hearings begin - Accuracy in Media (Media Monitor) July 27, 1995
- Israel Angle in Foster Case - Intelligence Newsletter, August 1995
- Foster Case Runs Into PROMIS, BCCI and Covert Ops - Intelligence, September 11, 1995
- Hackers vs. Vince Foster: Feeding Frenzy on the Net - by Daniel L. Brandt, NameBase NewsLine, No. 11, October-December 1995
- The Still Before the Storm - by James Norman, Media Bypass, December 1995
- Recap Of and Update On the Norman Thesis - by Brian Redman, Conspiracy Nation, January 1996
- James Norman on WBAI radio, January 10, 1996
- Early Retirement [of Politicians] - by James Norman, Media Bypass, February 1996
- The Super CIA and the Octopus - by Marvin Lee, Washington Weekly, March 11, 1996
- VWF and classified documents - James Norman Internet post, March 19, 1996
- "Angel of Death" Gives Deposition to Justice Department in Inslaw Case - by J. Orlin Grabbe, posted to the Internet April 4, 1996
- Jim Norman interviewed by Gary Null on WBAI Radio, May 13, 1996
- Jim Norman interviewed by Gary Null on WBAI Radio, May 14, 1996
- Saint Colby and the Fifth Column - by J. Orlin Grabbe, posted to the Internet May 21, 1996
- Disinfo on the Newsgroups - by Daniel L. Brandt, posted to the Internet May 24, 1996
- Jim Norman interviewed by John Bennett, posted to the Internet May 28, 1996
- Some Observations on the Non-News - by J. Orlin Grabbe, posted to the Internet June 17, 1996
- An Apology and Good-bye {satire!} - by J. Orlin Grabbe, posted to the Internet June 26, 1996
- Scandals 'damaging Clinton' - by Stephen Robinson, Electronic Telegraph, July 3, 1996
- The Clinton Crash - by J. Orlin Grabbe, posted to the Internet July 15, 1996
- Allegations Regarding Vince Foster, the NSA, and Banking Transactions Spying (parts 37-39) - by J. Orlin Grabbe, posted to the Internet November 11-14, 1996
- Newspaper the super-spooks dare not miss - by Ambrose Evans-Prichard, Electronic Telegraph, November 17, 1996
The Incarceration and Trial of Chuck Hayes- Angel of Death Arrested - by J. Orlin Grabbe, posted to the Internet October 24, 1996
- On AOD Arrest - by Jim Norman, posted to the Internet October 28, 1996
- Chuck Hayes Versus Bill Clinton - by J. Orlin Grabbe, posted to the Internet October 30, 1996
- Letter from J. Orlin Grabbe to Joseph L. Famularo, United States Attorney, Eastern District of Kentucky, November 15, 1996
- Orlin Grabbe Versus Joseph Famularo II - by J. Orlin Grabbe, posted to the Internet November 20, 1996
- Orlin Grabbe Versus Joseph Famularo III - by J. Orlin Grabbe, posted to the Internet November 21, 1996
- The FBI Conspiracy Against Chuck Hayes - by J. Orlin Grabbe, posted to the Internet November 23, 1996
- FBI Agent David "Killer" Keller Rides Again - by J. Orlin Grabbe, posted to the Internet November 26, 1996
- JAILED CHUCK HAYES CLAIMS FBI SETUP - by James Norman, Washington Weekly, December 9, 1996
- Famularo's Case Against Chuck Hayes Begins to Crumble - by J. Orlin Grabbe, posted to the Internet December 18, 1996
- Three Motions Filed by Chuck Hayes - posted to the Internet by J. Orlin Grabbe, December 30, 1996
- MURDER ON THE WORLD WIDE WEB (Or, More Gobbledegook From FBI Agent David "Killer" Keller) - by J. Orlin Grabbe, posted to the Internet January 8, 1997
- Federal Justice in London, Kentucky - by J. Orlin Grabbe, posted to the Internet January 10, 1997
- Court defense will challenge FBI to fight charge of hiring hit man - by Gail Gibson, South-Central Kentucky Bureau, Lexington Herald-Leader, January 13, 1997
- Writer told FBI of hit man talk, prosecutor says - by Gail Gibson, South-Central Kentucky Bureau, Lexington Herald-Leader, January 14, 1997
- Ex-CIA agent says officials set him up - by Gail Gibson, South-Central Kentucky Bureau, Lexington Herald-Leader, January 16, 1997
- JUDGE JENNIFER B. COFFMAN'S KANGAROO COURT [(Hayes Testimony Confirms Fifth-Column-Induced Political Retirements) Former Drug Dealer, Former Mental Patient Testify for Government] - by J. Orlin Grabbe, posted to the Internet January 16, 1997
- Witness's past prompts delay in murder-plot trial - by Gail Gibson, South-Central Kentucky Bureau, Lexington Herald-Leader, January 17, 1997
- Witness's past prompts delay in murder-plot trial - by Gail Gibson, South-Central Kentucky Bureau, Lexington Herald-Leader, January 17, 1997 (same story as previous)
- Sex with Hillary - by J. Orlin Grabbe, posted to the Internet January 18, 1997
- Letter to Chairman, House Judiciary Committee - by J. Orlin Grabbe, posted to the Internet January 21, 1997
- More on Lawrence W. Meyers - by J. Orlin Grabbe, posted to the Internet January 27, 1997
- Judge Jennifer Coffman's Kangaroo Court Continues - by J. Orlin Grabbe, posted to the Internet January 27, 1997
- Murder-for-hire defense goes on offense (Witness, investigator questioned in effort to turn tables) - by Gail Gibson, South-Central Kentucky Bureau, Lexington Herald-Leader, January 28, 1997
- Hayes found guilty in plot to have son murdered - by Gail Gibson, South-Central Kentucky Bureau, Lexington Herald-Leader, January 29, 1997
- The Make-Believe World of Charles Hayes - by J. Orlin Grabbe, posted to the Internet January 30, 1997
- Charles "Chuck" Hayes Convicted - by Brian Redman, Conspiracy Nation, posted to the Internet January 30, 1997
- Hayes says he still expects help from high places after conviction - Lexington Herald-Leader, January 30, 1997
- Charles Hayes: Motion for a Directed Verdict or Mistrial - by J. Orlin Grabbe, posted to the Internet January 31, 1997
- Lawrence Meyers Pleads Guilty to Grand Theft - by J. Orlin Grabbe, posted to the Internet January 31, 1997
- More on the Hayes Trial - by "John Q. Public", posted to the Internet February 5, 1997
Now don’t be crying alligator tears. I never said that Billary assassinated either Foster or Obama. Who did I ever label as a murderer and where did I do that? I draw no conclusion as to who pulled either trigger. I just lay out the facts; let others draw up the indictments (though I’d be happy to administer the lethal injections – LOL). Assuming that you know what I am thinking (and you are wrong by the way); what does it have to do with the truth? The fact is that the Daily News in a spread of many pages, claimed that no one saw it coming (the Barack Obama Iowa victory). THAT WAS A LIE. Again ; go back to my July 8th article on Obama; then go to my Novemeber 23rd article on Obama (this was printed exactly six weeks before the primary). You guys don't understand what a black man goes through every day of the week in these here United States (you just don't get it). If you read my Iowa prediction you will see that I was leaning towards this one also; and if you have been reading my Obama articles you will know this was coming. STOP HATING. I CALLED IT. NO ONE ELSE DID.
I STAND BT EVERYTHING I WROTE. TIME WILL BEAR ALL THIS OUT. THERE ARE OTHER THINGS ABOUT THE NH RACE THAT WILL SOON BE REVEALED. INCLUDING THE COUNT. Plus folks always question my sources; why? Haven't I proven after over 120 columns here, that my sources are exceptional?
They come up here and find the nerve to call me racist, but have they ever read any of my scores of articles here before they jump to such a conclusion. If they do that first I would then take them more seriously. I am no racist. I just highlight the denial that takes place on both sides of the racial divide. I have never suggested that the color of ones skin makes them less racist than another? You couldn't have read my writings here to say this. I will elaborate on their (Clintons)behavior in another column. This Clinton civil rights thing is a myth and it is obvious that you have bought into it.
BILL CLINTON WAS CONSIDERED AMERICA'S FIRST BLACK PRESIDENT BY WHO? Not by any people I know; and I sure don't consider him that. He is a lying power hungry manipulator, who has ruthlessly hurt a lot of people with his arrogance and insensitivity. Wait for my coming columns on them you will see.
I know some would like to se me "STFU" because truth by its very nature is controversial; but it doesn't change the price of coffee. I will never be ashamed of the TRUTH. Hilary Clinton went there (with JFK,MLK and LBJ); NOT BARACK OBAMA; not anyone from his campaign team; and DEFINITELY not me. When I warned you guys in my column that she touched the "HOLY GRAIL" of blacks in this country (and she will be punished), you didn't believe me. In fact you guys attacked me. Now we see the furor it caused. I didn't cause it. I just predicted it will haappen. And I was correct (as I generally am). You guys just don't ever seem to understand these things; that's why you guys attack me here so much. You will never give me my due; you will never give me credit.
These persistent attacks on me are sad; real sad.
To further their arguments they called me: pig, delusional and ignorant. Great. And of course they do it behind their anonymous mask. NICE. Do you know why this is so troubling to them it deals with RACE. Are they having a hard time accepting that a black man can so articulately express a position on this blog as I am doing? I have over 125 columns in my archives here, do go see them. I AM ENTITLED TO MY OPINION AND I HAVEN"T CALLED YOU ANY NAMES HAVE I? You guys are so predictable; you are the only ones entitled to an opinion. You are free to disagree but are not free to sling epithets. Away with you CAN YOU APPRECIATE THIS? This is DEPRESSING. Truly. WOW!!!!!!! It shows why race just can't seem to be resolved in this country. FACE TRUTHS PEOPLE: FACE THE TRUTH. Hilary started this. Rangel was wrong; stupidity.
Can anyone tell me where in my articles or threads did I call ANYONE (specifically named) a racist? Please name the paragraph, line and verse. NOW people (observers): watch this. Bet you, that- like I have done many many times in the past- these people would be unable to do this. Why? beacuse I called NO ONE a racist. These are the perpetual lying attacks that some of you fall for from my detractors. but then you say I complain too much. GET OFF THE SIDELINES AND HELP MAKE IT STOP. Whenever I ask any of my detractors here to show where I said the things claimed (paragraph and line)they never respond. WHY? Simple: I never wrote the things they claim. It's the lies I hate here most, from all these anonymous attackers. I don't mind the discourse but damn this is so tired. And to think that one of my biggest attackers here (WonK) says I am not being attacked here. Yoda does it sneakily; Wallner does it regularly; JP well he went way overboard with his lies, threaths and implications (in a column too); there are others with handles who do it also. And of course there are the many many anonymous ones who do it from behind their KKK white sheets. Then someone had the nerve on this thread right now to imply I do it all myself: so I attack myself with stuff like this: STFU (go see). IS THIS ALL BECAUSE I AM THE ONLY BLACK GUY SO PROLIFIC ON THE BLOGS OF NY (AND AUDACIOUS TOO)? COULD IT BE THAT? NAH. I am sure it can't be that. It is never about race; right?
Does anyone really think that a man who has taken on powers and potentates all my life-in USA and Trinidad- is afraid of criticism. Gimme a break. I have been in this rough and tumble world of politics all my life. I have taken on more powerful people than you can ever believe; WITHOUT FEAR. I am no coward and you fucking know this by now; so stop. I have done that (facing down powerful people) here and in real life; over and again. The point that I try to make, that they ignore the TRUTH behind my pointing out these incessant attacks. This is the "typical caucasian-denial" thing that I have tried to point out many times here. That's why I will highlight my successes here over and over. If I beat my own drum: fine; because it is my only way of getting back at all you cowards who attack me from behind the anonymous masks. It's like sticking out my middle finger at all of you hateful, vicious, spiteful and envious fools; some of whom I suspect are racists and are angry at this lil black coconut making these political calls with the high percentage success rate that I own. Now : go away.
I specifically stated from the jump I never called her (HRC)a racist or a murderer -but they said I did. Same for crook, dishonest and such. I laid my argument out and they distorted, embellished and exaggerated my words or points to try to smear me. They also said that it was libelous. Given the many lawyers at the Clinton's disposal do you think I wouldn't have been sued by now; given all the writings I have laid out here for years? They joined in the attack as blindly as bats fly. With each passing day media sources confirm the basic premise(s) of my columns; but they have never been honest enough to say: well, maybe we jumped to judgement and rushed to conclusions. Now we see that the re-count officials are admitting election irregularities. TOO MUCH FOR THEM TO CONCEDE THAT STONED WASN'T JUST SPEWING SOUR GRAPES AND THAT HIS SOURCES ARE GENERALLY ACCURATE. I said "HRC assassinated Obama", with her dirty campaign. They dislike me because I am a black man who is brave enough to take a public position against gay marriage. All sorts of threaths from anonymous people. enough already. I get the most comments here, and I defend my columns more than anyone else here; and this isn't even up for discussion. I get more comments by maybe twenty times or more my nearest comparitive fellow blogger on Room 8. And yet they make this preposterous claim that I do not defend what I write. WHY? Because I choose too ignore those who try to denigrate me, or those who I find intellectually dishonest. They also hate the fact that I am the most popular blogger here; it galls them. They try to put my writings down in subtle and not too subtle ways. But guess what: they all are so friggin fascinated with the varied stuff I write that they read it voraciously.
I have been targeted on these blogs for years now. So the question became: what do I do in return. I chose to hit back (my perogative); some of you don't like this; fine (your perogative). I also chose to rub their noses in the sand whenever my predictions came true (again my perogative), because it was my only other way of hiting back. If my ego was so whacked as you imply, I would sinply stop writing and not take this abuse; but through calls and e-mails, scores of people have begged me over and over to stay wriitng. I am dissappointed in the fact that you guys see the attacks but close your eyes. You see the truth but yet you close your eyes. They have been ganging up on me here for years. Maybe you don't get it. Question: is it because of my race and/ or ethnicity? I try not to go there but sometimes I wonder. (Commissioned Photos by Felix Wonker; portraits a specialty)
|
|