Here are the last two paragraphs of the article:

If you believe that a character who would conspire to profit off of white supremacy, anti-gay bigotry, and anti-Semitism is the best vehicle for convincing the country to end the drug war, to end our romance with interventionism, to encourage serious scrutiny of state violence, at every level, then you should be honest enough to defend that proposition.

What you should not do is claim that Ron Paul "legislated" for Martin Luther King Day, or claim to have intricate knowledge of Ron Paul's heart, and thus by the harsh accumulation of evidence, be made to look ridiculous.

• a character who would conspire to profit off of white supremacy
• anti-gay bigotry
• anti-Semitism being the best vehicle for convincing the country to end the drug war
• ending our romance with interventionism
• encourages serious scrutiny of state violence, at every level

That's all one should consider. Well, let's consider said points:

"a character who would conspire to profit off of white supremacy" - so, of course, we are still going with the meme of his "authorizing" the racist bent of the newsletters that bore his name. Never mind that he disavows these ideas with his words and actions. Conversely, Rick Santorum makes up some stupid-ass story about how he wasn't referring to BLACK PEOPLE - eat me with that crap, Rick. What about Newt's assertion that Black people don't wish to work for their money, but have the hand out for food stamps? Never mind that a greater percentage of NON-BLACK PEOPLE are on public assistance; let's not let REALITY get in the way, right?

"anti-gay bigotry" - more nonsense from the newsletters he didn't write - too easy.

"anti-Semitism is the best vehicle for convincing the country to end the drug war" - what does this even mean? Seriously...has anyone actually read this beyond the empty canard of "anti-Semitism"? First of all, if you take the example of Portugal, you can see that what we call the "War on Drugs" is a COLOSSAL FAILURE, and is in fact the "War on U.S. Citizens". We have troops in Afghanistan guarding poppy fields, from which comes our heroin, which is then shipped to our shores and sold, whereupon the buyers are arrested and their lives UTTERLY RUINED. You tell me if this isn't the perfect business model. For more of my analysis, see my article, http://www.r8ny.com/blog/vincent_nunes/the_octopus_revealed.html - it's a bit of fun. Also, see http://whatreallyhappened.com/ru/content/afghanistan-troops-guarding-poppy-fields

"to end our romance with interventionism" - and what a romance it has been, right? It's been more like an escort service where you don't get a happy ending, after paying up the wazoo for a pig with lipstick.

"to encourage serious scrutiny of state violence, at every level" - oh, sure...no one should be paying attention to THAT.

Wow.

If you truly read this article, and avoid the "jumping together" arguments which actually don't even coalesce to a coherent point, this is the best reason to avoid Mitt "Bain Capital's vulture capitalism's gonna make me rich, baybee!" Romney, Newt "Get In My BED!" Gingrich and "Rick "I said BLAH people! Really!" Santorum, and select Ron Paul as the Republican nominee for the 2012 election.

Please remember, I don't drink the Kool-Aid, but I definitely don't like the taste of what the Three Stooges are serving.

Vincent,

Here's their next move: The Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act, or CISPA, would obliterate any semblance of online privacy in the United States.

And CISPA would provide a victory for content owners who were shell-shocked by the unprecedented outpouring of activism in opposition to SOPA and Internet censorship.

The House of Representatives is planning to take up CISPA later this month. Click here to ask your lawmakers to oppose it.

SOPA was pushed as a remedy to the supposed economic threat of online piracy -- but economic fear-mongering didn't quite do the trick.  

So those concerned about copyright are engaging in sleight of hand, appending their legislation to a bill that most Americans will assume is about keeping them safe from bad guys.

This so-called cyber security bill aims to prevent theft of "government information" and "intellectual property" and could let ISPs block your access to websites -- or the whole Internet. 

Don't let them push this back-door SOPA.  Click here to demand that your lawmakers oppose CISPA.

CISPA also encourages companies to share information about you with the government and other corporations.

That data could then be used for just about anything -- from prosecuting crimes to ad placements.

And perhaps worst of all, CISPA supercedes all other online privacy protections. 

Please click here to urge your lawmakers to oppose CISPA when it comes up for a vote this month.

Thanks for fighting for the Internet.

-Demand Progress

PS - CISPA is likely to see a vote later this month. Please urge your friends to take action by forwarding this email or using these links:

	If you're already on Facebook, click here to share with your friends.
	If you're already on Twitter, click here to tweet about the campaign: Tweet