Tuesday's Big Loser - Rev. Al

People like me who think Al Sharpton is more a creation of the media than an authentic leader of the African-American community were hopeful that Rev. Al’s truly pathetic vote totals when he ran for President would cause people to stop taking him seriously.

In that year, Sharpton lost the black majority District of Columbia primary to Howard Dean, finished 3rd with less than 10% in South Carolina where Blacks were 50% of the turnout and lost badly to “soul brother” John Kerry in both of Central Brooklyn’s Congressional districts.

But that was not to be as the press and pols continued to treat Al like he could deliver voters. In 2004, the DNC paid him fly around the country and say at the Four Season in an attempt to energize minority voters. In 2005, the NYC press hyperventilated in speculating over how Al would react to Freddie Ferrer’s comments about the Dialo shooting. And after Sharpton endorsed Ferrer, his campaign blew a few thousand of his scarce campaign war chest on that embarrassing ad showing Al dancing.

So I don’t expect this year’s Primary results to stop dumb pols and lazy reporters from treating Sharpton like a kingmaker but it’s instructive to review the results.

I don’t have a list of all of his endorsements but 3 races in predominately Black parts of Brooklyn tell us a lot. Sharpton was one of the most prominent supporters of Carl Andrews in his quest for Congress, marching with him at the West Indian Day Parade. Andrews, of course, finished 3rd with fewer than 25% of the vote.

Al was probably the most prominent supporter of Tracy Boyland in her attempt to unseat State Senator Velmanette Montgomery. Boyland lost 2 to 1.

And in a race that received no press coverage but was commented on in this blog by Rock Hackshaw, a young, energetic, articulate assistant to Sharpton, Kirsten Foy challenged Democratic State Committeeman Moses Moore. Both Rock and Maurice Gumbs speculated that Moore was vulnerable because of his ties to disgraced future convict Clarence Norman and Moore was as he lost on Tuesday. But not to Al’s aide. Foy came in a bad 3rd with less than 15% of the vote!

Now to be fair, there are at least 2 winners that Sharpton backed. But that may tell us more about his integrity and intellectual consistency than anything else.

Sharpton backed Congressman Ed Towns over Councilman Charles Barron. This despite the fact that after Towns endorsed Rudy Giuliani for re-election as Mayor in 1997, Sharpton threatened that he might challenge Towns for re-election in 1998. I wonder what changed since that that convinced Al, who likes to proclaim that he is a progressive leader, that Towns deserved support over Barron. Was it Towns support for CAFTA or his defense of big tobacco?

Sharpton also endorsed Andrew Cuomo for AG a week before the Primary. I’m not surprised that nobody pointed out at the time that in 1994, Sharpton thought so little of Andrew’s dad that he authorized a campaign to get Black voters to write-in Sharpton for Governor in an attempt to defeat Mario. And that in January of this year, Al was incensed at Andrews for disrespecting the memory of Martin Luther King, Jr. by being the only major pol not to show up on King’s Birthday to kiss Al’s ring in Harlem Maybe some of  the money Cuomo got that day for speaking in Las Vegas found it’s way into the National Action Network’s treasury?



Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 09/14/2006 - 2:14pm.

Sharpton apparently also backed Brooklyn's Diane Gordon's successful campaign for renomination as the Democratic Party's candidate for Assemblymember and District leader in the 40th district.   Gordon,  presently under indictment and awaiitng trial after being caught on videotape discussing acceptance of bribes from a developer who promised her a home in a "gated community" (how poetic),  defeated two challengers for her Assembly  seat as well as  a challenger  for her female district leader position.  

Palm cards with Sharpton's picture endorsing Gordon were distributed around the district on election day. 


Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 09/14/2006 - 3:58pm.
    Sharpton also backed Theresa Freeman for State Committee in Harlem and she lost to Sylvia Tyler by 46 votes.

Submitted by Errol on Thu, 09/14/2006 - 5:10pm.
1. Sharpton was in Florida giving a speech on Primary Day. Clearly not a priority for him. 2. Carl Andrews (like Darlene Mealy) was a Sharpton presidential delegate and a fairly big donor to Sharpton's organization, so he was bound to support Carl, no matter what his chances of sucess. 3. Outside the view of most NY observers, Sharpton caters to a patchwork constituency that includes volunteer activists; backers of his presidential bid; ministers and parishioners in churches most of us have never heard of; a national radio audience; and dues-paying members of National Action Network chapters around the country. I have found, in covering his politic doings, that it's nearly impossible to understand his choices and actions without asking. 4. Palm cards may be the least reliable way to figure who's with whom, especially on election day in Brooklyn. Sitting on my desk are palm cards I was handed with Sharpton endorsing Velmanette Montgomery (not Tracy Boyland) and Sharpton endorsing Freddie Hamilton (not Hakeem Jeffries). I was also interested to see, on a visit to Barron's headquarters, stacks of Diane Gordon palm cards just waiting to be picked up and distributed by Barron's volunteers. Forget about palm cards. 5. You say that Sharpton has scant influence, but fail to explain why so many pols either court him or try to keep him out of their way. Are Clinton, Bloomberg, Cuomo and Kerry all just hapless dummies?
Submitted by Yoda on Thu, 09/14/2006 - 5:49pm.
To answer Errol's last question - they kiss Al's ring because it's easier and cheaper to do that rather than having to respond to questions from gullible reporters about why "CIVIL RIGHTS LEADER AL SHARPTON" is attacking them. To respond to your first - if this year's Primary not being a priority is an excuse for his lousy showing - what was the excuse when he ran for President. Was that not a priority for Al either?

Submitted by Gate (not verified) on Fri, 09/15/2006 - 6:45am.
Yoda, are you saying that Barron was the prferable candidate? Are you smoking crack?
Submitted by Yoda on Fri, 09/15/2006 - 7:48am.
I'm saying if you sincerely believed in the views that Al Sharpton states he has, then Barron was the prefable candidate. Those are not my views so he was not my choice. But unlike Al, I don't appear on NY 1 and pontificate about whether or not Hillary Clinton is a real Democrat, which believe it or not Al was asked by his #1 PR person Dominic Carter recently.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 09/15/2006 - 12:53pm.

I have just read the 6:10 pm Errol Louis comment. How sad to see a once-vibrant journalist become a regular apologist for people like Carl Andrews and Al Sharpton. Will we see an explanation about Diane Gordon next? I said about a decade ago that Al Sharpton sees every election season as an opportunity to receive pay-offs from candidates. This is just a game and a joke for him.  And there is little sublety. Al Sharpton's support can generally be bought.  And if Errol doesn't know it, I have a bridge for him to purchase. Sometimes Al even has a bidding situation for his support.

There have been times when Al has been paid for his support by multiple candidates in the same race. He's  never going to refuse a check. The record shows that Al is not concerned about race, morality or even Party when it comes to taking money and endorsing candidates.  

Actually, candidates  can consider Al a kind of two-legged commercial.  You pay your money and you get some exposure if you're lucky. 

But today, the fact is that Al Sharpton is a shadow of himself.  I doubt that that Al is able to make a winner out of an underdog.  Besides, underdogs seldom have the $$$ it takes to pay Al for his endorsement. 

And why do people like Bloomberg, Kerry, Clinton etc make nice to Al?  It's not because they think he can bring them votes.  They just want to stuff his mouth with a bundle of $$$$ so he keeps his mouth shut about them.

And about those palm cards in Barron's office, Errol.  Please give us more details.  The request is made on an article about to be posted.

And by the way.  You can always tell legitimate palm cards by the "paid for by Committee" at the bottom.  In addition, my experience is that most candidates will not put the photograph of someone, accompanied by "Endorsed By"  or  "Asks You to Elect" unless it is genuine. The phony palm cards are usually more vague to avoid legal problems.


Submitted by maurice (not verified) on Fri, 09/15/2006 - 5:36pm.

1:53 above is my post.  didn't  intend to be anonymous

Maurice 


Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 09/15/2006 - 5:55pm.
Don't know about any other Boro. But in a contest between Baron and Sharpton, Baron win two to one with African Americans. Reverend Al is yesterday's news. Especially among the younger people. They relate to Barron. Some of them only hear about sharpton. But they know Barron. So Sharpton will do anything to block Barron.
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sat, 10/28/2006 - 8:19am.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sat, 10/28/2006 - 8:19am.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sat, 10/28/2006 - 8:20am.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sat, 10/28/2006 - 8:20am.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sat, 10/28/2006 - 8:20am.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sat, 10/28/2006 - 8:21am.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sat, 10/28/2006 - 8:21am.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sat, 10/28/2006 - 8:21am.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sat, 10/28/2006 - 4:35pm.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sat, 10/28/2006 - 4:35pm.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sat, 10/28/2006 - 4:35pm.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sat, 10/28/2006 - 4:36pm.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sat, 10/28/2006 - 4:36pm.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sun, 10/29/2006 - 1:47am.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sun, 10/29/2006 - 1:47am.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sun, 10/29/2006 - 1:48am.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sun, 10/29/2006 - 1:48am.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sun, 10/29/2006 - 1:48am.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sun, 10/29/2006 - 1:48am.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sun, 10/29/2006 - 1:50am.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sun, 10/29/2006 - 1:50am.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sun, 10/29/2006 - 1:50am.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sun, 10/29/2006 - 1:50am.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sun, 10/29/2006 - 1:51am.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 10/30/2006 - 9:40am.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 10/30/2006 - 9:40am.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 10/30/2006 - 9:41am.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 10/30/2006 - 9:41am.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 10/30/2006 - 9:41am.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 10/30/2006 - 9:41am.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 10/30/2006 - 9:42am.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 10/30/2006 - 9:42am.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 10/30/2006 - 9:42am.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 10/30/2006 - 9:42am.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 10/30/2006 - 9:42am.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 10/30/2006 - 9:43am.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 10/30/2006 - 9:43am.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 10/30/2006 - 9:44am.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 10/30/2006 - 9:44am.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 10/30/2006 - 9:44am.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 11/01/2006 - 5:51pm.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.