I have finished compiling the census bureau’s state and local finance data for Fiscal 2004, and you can have the spreadsheet if you e-mail me at vampire-state (at) att (dot) net, putting state and local finance in the subject so I know the e-mail is not spam. Since the Bureau also compiled data for Fiscal 2002, the last budget before 9/11, we can see how that event affected the city’s finances, and thus how that affected us all. The answer is the city became worse off, in part because when all the dollars are counted, Albany and Washington reacted to the tragedy by directing more money away from New York City. And the many ways in which New York City and state differ from the national average became more pronounced.
An interview with Carl Andrews, immediately after his endorsement by Elliott Spitzer, Billy Thompson, and David Dinkins should now convince every intelligent voter once and for all that Carl is absolutely not the person Brooklyn or any community would want to represent them in Congress. Elliot Spitzer would have been chased out of Manhattan if he had tried to pass off someone with Carl Andrews’ credentials on his community. Bill Thompson’s father was one of the first to demand that Clarence be indicted. And here was Billy trying to patch up relationships for a race in 2009 which he will never win. Dave Dinkins was asleep. Carl finally escaped from his handlers, and talked about his qualifications. What a Mess! We quote exactly what Carl had to say about himself on a taped recording by Sun Reporter, Azi Paybarah on June 26, 2006 02:03 PM
Gatemouth said something similar to this before, but I want to add my 1¢ (2¢ adjusted for inflation) and take it up a notch. If Chris Owens is truly concerned about a white
We've seen the various pols come out and say that David should not be "allowed" to win this seat. Obviously there have been differing opinions about how that should be accomplished and why, but Chris's comment last week as quoted on the Daily Politics really went too far in this delicate subject of race and this seat. In case you missed it, here's what he said: "What if an Israeli Arab won an election for Prime Minister because other Israeli Jewish candidates split the vote? I think Jews would be upset about that." (It's funny that Chris should use this analogy, since he's very quick to point out that he is 1/2 jewish himself.)
Last year the "Race to Watch" was the Manhattan Borough President race. A semi-newcomer to the political scene was one of the nine candidates on the ballot. Along with the likes of members of the State Assembly, City Councilmembers and a former City Councilmember, was Brian Ellner.
Brian Ellner's previously was on the school board and was in private practice at a big law firm in the city before his run. Mr. Ellner is tall, white, good-looking, gay, has a long-term partner, is a good speaker and he had lots of great ideas for the office. He received a lot of support from the gay community, especially young white men. But for the fact that another openly gay candidate was running (the New York Post's favorite, Margarita Lopez), he would have probably swept the gay clubs for their endorsement. During the height of the campaign, you could not go to a gay event without seeing him. Especially in Chelsea, he was ubiquitous. It seemed as if he was running for mayor of Chelsea; he couldn't possibly be campaigning in the rest of the borough when he was at every single gay event imaginable.
Seems to me like Representative Gary L. Ackerman (D-NY) has some explaining to do.
In late 2003, knee-deep in regret over his Iraq war vote, Ackerman released a statement explaining his then reluctant support of President Bush's $87 billion supplemental appropriations bill. In it, he lambasts the GOP's Halliburtonistic tendencies:
Problem was, that by that time, one of Ackerman's wealthiest contributors was also getting shnoockered off the Afghanistan and Iraq war troughs. And an even bigger problem – that Ackerman was himself getting tipsy as well; and in fact, has gotten sloshed off the war ever since.
Forget the Knicks, MSG, James Dolan, Isiah Thomas, and Larry Brown. For the feel-good story, follow where Quincy Douby goes in Wednesday's NBA draft.
Both the NY Knicks and the NJ Nets have two low first round picks each in the NBA draft.
Douby (who's Haitian), grew up in Coney Island. He's very thin, but he can shoot the lights out. He played at Rutgers, where he averaged over 25 points a game.
So, if the Nets pick Douby, they can say that he's the Rutgers local product. And if the Nets move to Brooklyn, he's the Brooklyn high school product.
It's a great story for this Wednesday and local basketball fans.
***Wink***Wink*** Hi, I'm Politiko. I'm here simply as a political observer to chime in with the likes of Messrs. Gatemouth, Hackshaw, Yoda, Enwhyseawonk, Gumbs and Littlefield (where, by the way, are the women? Ms. Markowitz seldom posts and might not really be female)
My Mama tried to raise me to a be a proper gentleman and she succeeded for the most part (you'll hear no swearing from me). But the "if you don't have anything nice to say, don't say anything" part never sunk in. I plan on providing some constructive criticism for the Powers-That-Be and the Wanna-Be-Powers-That-Be, and, heck, maybe I'll even throw in some praise once in a while. But whatever you do, please don't take me too seriously, I'm often winking. ;-)
Why would Elliot Spitzer endorse a candidate who is described consistently in the press as “ the confidante of a convicted felon” or “a close friend of the County Leader who was convicted of felony corruption.?” Almost every day , one newspaper or the other virtually raises that question as it reports on Carl Andrews and his congressional candidacy.
Two excerpts from articles in just the last few days:
From Celeste Katz, Daily News reporter, June 19: “Self-styled reformer and gubernatorial front-runner Eliot Spitzer is going to bat today for a congressional candidate with close ties to convicted former Brooklyn Democratic boss Clarence Norman.”
While New York City tabloids have had fun coming up with clever headlines to decry the steep decline in homeland security funding under a new "threat-based" formula, Buffalo's one paper has been a touch more subdued. People here are somewhat more numb to bad news, perhaps.
Today's headline: "Terror threat assessment of region may now consider border"
WNY's homeland security funds dropped from $10 million in 2005 to $3 million in 2006 as a result of a threat reassessment that saw the region plunge from 25th to 46th out of 46 urban areas.
The Wall St. Journal has a web site called Opinion Journal’s Political Diary. It’s a pretty interesting combination of opinions & political rundowns, with the Journal’s political biases.
The site is not usually free but they are offering a free two-week trial.
But sometimes you get what you pay for.
From the June 21st Political Diary –
Marylanders opposed to the state's new Early Voting law reached a milestone this week with enough petition signatures to bring a November referendum into the realm of possibility. Not a happy omen for the state's heavily Democratic legislature and its most blatant effort yet to club Republican Governor Robert Ehrlich.
Buried in today's Page Six:
DHS Secretary Michael Chertoff participates in a 10:00 am ET panel sponsored by the Heritage Foundation: "'24' and America's Image in Fighting Terrorism: Fact, Fiction or Does it Matter?" The three "24" cast members who are expected to participate: Mary Lynn Rajskub (Chloe O'Brian), Carlos Bernard (Tony Almeida), and Gregory Itzin (President Charles Logan). Rush Limbaugh takes the day off from the radio show to moderate.
A quick look at how Brooklynites (by zip) are voting with their wallets in the race to replace Congressman Owens.
Of the Department of Homeland Security, Dunleavy says:
With Rock and Gate firmly ensconced, I'm certain there's little more I can add to the world of Brooklyn politics - especially to all that is the wacky 11th.
But, do allow me to throw into the mix a few facts about the numbers - since, usually, they don't lie (though in Brooklyn....???).
Clearly, David Yassky wins hands down as the Megabuxster of this race; meaning, lots 'o big money and big interests in tow. What follows is the average size of each candidate's itemized contributions (those over $200).
The extent to which certain industries dangle Yassky's purse strings is not insignificant. According to the Center for Responsive Politics, the Finance/Insurance/Real Estate and the Legal/Lobby industries combined own nearly 25% of Yassky Corp ... a staggering amount (if you ask me).