In the latest Harris poll Bush’s job approval drops to 29% positive, though it is fully at 67% positive among Republicans, it is only 19% among independents and 10% among Democrats and there is no gender gap. Only 24% feel the country is going in the right direction. Will this mean the Republicans will lose control of Congress?
Approval of the job Congress is doing is a paltry 18% positive with Republican respondents having a 3-point worse opinion of the job Congress is doing than the Democrats. When ask how Republican and Democratic members were doing in Congress those polled gave Republicans in Congress 20% positive and Democrats in Congress 23% positive.
One of the most annoying phenomena plaguing New York City political blogs is the mini-cult which has developed around the blogger who calls himself Gatemouth. I am certainly not alone in holding this opinion. Indeed, in the past few weeks, several anonymous bloggers have made childish attempts to expose persons who they consider to be Gatemouth. This is missing the point entirely; what is needed is not exposure of Gatemouth’s identity, but rather his agenda.
Unlike many of Gatemouth’s detractors, I often find Gatemouth good reading, despite his windy renditions of political history and his obsession with cultural trivia. But though he might be good reading, he gives off bad karma.
Am I only person to wonder why not? State and local governments reap a revenue windfall when housing prices go up, when Wall Street booms and when people shop more. Why shouldn't they get more $ from people keep driving?
Last week, I posted a comment that lazy reporting in the NY Times resulted in them echoing GOP Senate candidate John Spencer's line that he never denied his affair with a secretary who he promoted to Chief of Staff.
Today (Thursday), the Times comes back to the story and this time comes close to the truth -
After refusing to discuss the relationship for years, Mr. Spencer acknowledged it publicly in 2002.
A letter to the editor in Wednesday’s New York Times reminded me why I hate Ralph Nader and his Green Party supporters.
The letter from Theresa Amato, Nader’s Campaign Manager responding to Thomas Friedman’s assertion that Nader cost Al Gore the election in 2000, reads in part:
“The writer blames Ralph Nader for George W. Bush, despite the millions of Democrats who voted for Mr. Bush in 2000; Al Gore's loss of his home state; and the Florida legal battles”
My problem with Nader and the Greens is that they won’t take responsibility for their actions.
Let a green guy go away for vacation and I come back to the Suozzi follies on Room 8. Honestly, I can't leave for a few days without the BS. Let me get this straight.
You are a reformer. You are the guy who's transformed Nassau. Life is all peaches and you run for governor after getting elected months before. And then, reality hits.
You call for tolls on the LIE, you call for the heads of Bruno and Silver, you go to some fort to challenge Spitzer to a debate, and then you go to the circus?
What am I missing here? Is the hate for Eliot Spitzer so deep that people will post anything to try a support a loser? This is a major disappointment, an embarassment.
There are few people who would deny that Elliot Spitzer has done a decent job as Attorney General of New York State. I would think only a handful maybe, and probably Republicans mostly. Some of his detractors say he is a bit aggressive and “macho”, others say he is a bully. Others yet claim that he is an “alpha–male” all the way, possessing too much testosterone. Point being, there is no real attack on his competency and/or capability. In most regards, this is good for Spitzer.
The only area where Spitzer seems vulnerable is the one where his relationship with Albany legislators can be gauged. The least you can say is that he has been quite accommodating. Can anyone find the public attacks on Albany (from Spitzer) in the past decade? And for sure, most elected officials are lining up in droves to endorse him. Not surprisingly, his endorsement list will be an Albany “who is who” list.
Last Thursday night, at the endorsement meeting of Brooklyn's Independent Neighborhood Democratic Political Club ( IND), Charles Barron almost did the unthinkable: he came within a handful of votes from winning the club's endorsement for the 10th Congressional race. Observers ( both black and white) claimed that he blew away the group with his presentation. He did so well that it took 3 ballots for the club to end up with a " no endorsement". Don't forget that the chairperson of this club is a Towne's staffer.
Most people there were surprised that Barron could connect so well with a white audience, and this was dismaying to many of his detractors. If this is an indication of how tough this campaign could get for the incumbent, then it's imperative that all of you in "out-here-land", keep your seat belts on.
“We must demand that the Speaker of the New York State Assembly and the Majority Leader of the New York State Senate be replaced, because they have failed to fight for the reforms that we seek. The current leadership in Albany has had ample opportunity to heed the message of reform and address the problems New Yorkers face, but they have spent far more energy making backroom deals to protect their own majorities. ..New York belongs to the nearly twenty million people who call our State home, not to three men in a room in Albany. With Governor Pataki on his way out, it is time to show Majority Leader Bruno and Speaker Silver the door, as well.” ---- Tom Suozzi, speaking at a conference on government reform.
Here's a headline designed to cause cognitive dissonance among the entire membership of "Develop Don't Destroy Brooklyn" and most of their allies. I can't wait to watch Chuck Barron's Head explode when he tries to process this:
"California Town Uses Eminent Domain to Block Wal-Mart"- New York Sun, May 9, 2006.
Bertha Lewis was probably pleased. Marty Markowitz probably had mixed feelings.
Bertha, what will you do when Bruce Ratner tries to open a Wal-Mart?
Perhaps love goes too far on the sarcasm scale, but ...
Here's the deal for tomorrow's Stated City Council Meeting:
First, Council Member Vallone will be re-re-re-introducing a bill for New York City to secede from the State; or at least to form a Commission that will look into said matter. We likey!
Second, Council Member Oddo will be triple-re-introducing a bill to prohibit the use of non-wooden bats. Apparently, they hurt less?!?!
Thirdly, our esteemed Public Advocate will be expressing her concerns by seeking to restrict the use of tanning beds in tanning salons. That is way too smart for us to understand...
Always good to know what your Congress Member is up to. So thought I'd shed a quick bit of light on who's been doing what...
Here are New York's top five congressional vote missers from January 2005 to the present (umm ... hmmm ... seems like someone has some explaining to do):
And kudos to New York's top five congressional vote casters...
Update: John Sweeney missed 60 out of 555 recorded votes in 2005, and 62 out of 107 votes in 2006.
Daily Gotham coups this sneak peak of the yet-to-be-published New York Times local political blog ...
A Man After Our Hearts
"We must demand that the Speaker of the New York State Assembly and the Majority Leader of the New York State Senate be replaced, because they have failed to fight for the reforms that we seek," said Suozzi.
Nuf' freakin' said!
Now, we are curious ... Mr. Spitzer, what say you?
The dichotomy in politics between what people say they favor and the contents of their actual agenda is often striking. Take the so-called “Right to Life” movement. As an article by Russell Shorto in today’s NY Times Magazine makes clear; the real agenda of many “Right to Lifers” isn’t preventing abortions, but preventing sex. That is not to say this is the agenda of all “Right to Lifers”. I have a gay Catholic friend, who when confronted with the dichotomy between his opposition to abortion and his sexual libertarianism, always smiles and says “blow jobs don’t kill babies”. And certainly there are outspoken "Right to Lifers" like Nat Hentoff who strongly advocate access to contraception and comprehensive sex education as part of an effort to prevent abortions.